Sarah Grand (1854–1943)
Autor/a de The Beth Book
Sobre l'autor
Crèdit de la imatge: Courtesy of the NYPL Digital Gallery (image use requires permission from the New York Public Library)
Obres de Sarah Grand
Singularly deluded 2 exemplars
Singulary deluded 1 exemplars
Variety 1 exemplars
Grand, Sarah (Frances McFall) Archive 1 exemplars
Obres associades
Etiquetat
Coneixement comú
- Nom normalitzat
- Grand, Sarah
- Nom oficial
- Bellenden Clarke, Frances Elizabeth (birth)
Chambers McFall, Mrs David (marriage)
Chambers McFall, Mrs Frances Elizabeth (widowhood) - Data de naixement
- 1854-06-10
- Data de defunció
- 1943-05-12
- Gènere
- female
- Nacionalitat
- Ireland (birth)
UK - Lloc de naixement
- Donaghadee, County Down, Ireland
- Lloc de defunció
- Calne, Wiltshire, England, UK
- Llocs de residència
- London, England, UK
Tunbridge Wells, Kent, England, UK
Calne, Wiltshire, England, UK
Bath, Somerset, England, UK
Donaghadee, County Down, Ireland
Bridlington, Yorkshire, England, UK (mostra-les totes 8)
Norwich, Norfolk, England, UK
Warrington, England, UK - Educació
- finishing school
Royal Naval School, Twickenham - Professions
- writer
novelist
suffragist - Relacions
- Betham-Edwards, Matilda (friend)
- Biografia breu
- Sarah Grand was the pseudonym of Frances Elizabeth Bellenden Clarke, born in Ireland to British parents. In 1870, she married Major David Chambers McFall, a widowed military physician, more than 20 years her senior, and had one son. The family traveled in the Far East for Dr. McFall's work, and she learned about anatomy and physiology from him. She adopted the name Sarah Grand for her writing, which gave her an outlet for her unhappiness in marriage. Her best-known works were The Heavenly Twins (1893), which dealt honestly with sexually-transmitted disease; and the semi-autobiographical The Beth Book (1898), which advocated personal independence for women. Sarah Grand is credited with coining the phrase "The New Woman" to describe the late 19th-century woman who was fighting for higher education and the right to vote. She spent the latter part of her life in the city of Bath, and served a term as Lady Mayoress.
Membres
Ressenyes
recommended to me as: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/8676 The Heavenly Twins, by Sarah Grand. A "New Woman" novel, which demands that men be held accountable for things like faithlessness before marriage, too. Screamingly funny in parts, very not-so in others. Has twins, crossdressing, tomboys, and (possible trigger warning) attempted suicide.
What do you do when you realize you're reading a book only because you "should"? I had high hopes for The Beth Book, a Virago Modern Classic first published in 1897 and billed as "the story of all Victorian women who rebelled against the conventions imposed upon their sex." Oh yeah, that's right up my street. Bring it on!
Sadly, this autobiographical novel suffered from a dialogue-heavy style that insisted on telling, not showing. The story opens the day before Beth's birth, and author Sarah Grand wastes no time showing her reader the reality of women's lives in the late 19th century. Of Beth's mother, she writes:
She was weak and ill and anxious, the mother of six children already, and about to produce a seventh on an income that would have been insufficient for four. It was a reckless thing for a delicate woman to do, but she never thought of that. She lived in the days when no one thought of the waste of women in this respect, and they had not begun to think for themselves. (p. 1)
Later, when Beth is old enough for school, Grand tells us how society felt about women's education:
The education of children was a more serious matter, however -- a matter of principle, in fact, as opposed to a matter of taste. Mrs. Caldwell had determined to give her boys a good start in life. In order to do this on her very limited income, she was obliged to exercise the utmost self-denial, and even with that, there would be little or nothing left to spend on the girls. This, however, did not seem to Mrs. Caldwell to be a matter of much importance. It is customary to sacrifice the girls of a family to the boys; to give them no educational advantages, and then to jeer at them for their ignorance and silliness. (p. 114)
At each milestone in Beth's life, Grand makes points about societal conventions, the constraints women faced every day, and the views men held about women. This was probably revolutionary in its day, but oh my, it just took her forever to tell a story. Notice in the quotes above, that after 100 pages Beth is only just starting school. The "blurb" on the back cover promises a romantic story of a bad marriage and Beth's eventual escape to "a room of her own, a career of her own and to a man who loves her for the New Woman she becomes," but first we have slog through a narrative describing "this happened, and then this, and then this." After 300 pages the bad marriage is finally upon us, but there are still 225 pages to go before the book delivers the promise on the back cover.
When I realized the writing wasn't working for me, I tried to focus on the message, and the courage that writing and publishing The Beth Book required. Unfortunately, that wasn't enough to turn this novel into a pleasant reading experience.… (més)
Sadly, this autobiographical novel suffered from a dialogue-heavy style that insisted on telling, not showing. The story opens the day before Beth's birth, and author Sarah Grand wastes no time showing her reader the reality of women's lives in the late 19th century. Of Beth's mother, she writes:
She was weak and ill and anxious, the mother of six children already, and about to produce a seventh on an income that would have been insufficient for four. It was a reckless thing for a delicate woman to do, but she never thought of that. She lived in the days when no one thought of the waste of women in this respect, and they had not begun to think for themselves. (p. 1)
Later, when Beth is old enough for school, Grand tells us how society felt about women's education:
The education of children was a more serious matter, however -- a matter of principle, in fact, as opposed to a matter of taste. Mrs. Caldwell had determined to give her boys a good start in life. In order to do this on her very limited income, she was obliged to exercise the utmost self-denial, and even with that, there would be little or nothing left to spend on the girls. This, however, did not seem to Mrs. Caldwell to be a matter of much importance. It is customary to sacrifice the girls of a family to the boys; to give them no educational advantages, and then to jeer at them for their ignorance and silliness. (p. 114)
At each milestone in Beth's life, Grand makes points about societal conventions, the constraints women faced every day, and the views men held about women. This was probably revolutionary in its day, but oh my, it just took her forever to tell a story. Notice in the quotes above, that after 100 pages Beth is only just starting school. The "blurb" on the back cover promises a romantic story of a bad marriage and Beth's eventual escape to "a room of her own, a career of her own and to a man who loves her for the New Woman she becomes," but first we have slog through a narrative describing "this happened, and then this, and then this." After 300 pages the bad marriage is finally upon us, but there are still 225 pages to go before the book delivers the promise on the back cover.
When I realized the writing wasn't working for me, I tried to focus on the message, and the courage that writing and publishing The Beth Book required. Unfortunately, that wasn't enough to turn this novel into a pleasant reading experience.… (més)
2 
lauralkeet | Hi ha 3 ressenyes més | Apr 5, 2013 |
lauralkeet | Hi ha 3 ressenyes més | Apr 5, 2013 | Early chapters' description of childhood rivals that of George Eliot's Mill on the Floss. Overly long and didactic in the later sections but there were enough well phrased thoughts to keep me happily reading. "Falsifications of our better selves are easily entered upon, but hard to shake off."
Llistes
Premis
Potser també t'agrada
Autors associats
Estadístiques
- Obres
- 12
- També de
- 2
- Membres
- 249
- Popularitat
- #91,698
- Valoració
- 3.7
- Ressenyes
- 5
- ISBN
- 55
- Preferit
- 1
This novel concerns the life story of a girl named Beth, who grows up into a woman named Beth. Beth is one of those delightfully sassy female protagonists: there's not a little bit of Jane Eyre in her youth, especially when she is shunted off to a conservative girls' school, to which she turns out to be totally unsuited, but manages to bring under her control, almost. For example, many of the younger girls find their ways into informal "families" managed by the older girls, but Beth does not. A teacher suggests she ought to be, so Beth forms her own: making herself the "mother" to a group of older girls, the worst-behaved ones in the school. When the teacher expresses concern that they are a bad influence, Beth responds that she will straighten them out. And she does. This phase of the book was probably my favorite, combining as it does jokes with some good early feminist contempt for Victorian women's education, which left you unable to do anything except get married.
I hate to be one of those people who diagnoses fictional characters who were invented before the relevant mental illnesses were discovered, but I wanted to read both a mild autism spectrum disorder and bipolar disorder into Beth. Beth has "bright eyes" with "phenomenal receptivity" (42) and "learned to read a countenance long before she learned to read a book" (43), but sometimes struggles to pick up on unspoken social cues. When she's chastised for speaking with her mouth full by her uncle, she rejoins that he never told her this rule, and she will abide by it now that she knows (126-7). She has a similar complaint when at school. We're also told at one point that she suffers from "depression of spirits" but that she also has phases of great activity and excitement. By all accounts, Beth is pretty squarely based on Sarah Grand's life, and I know little about her.
I picked up this book because it features a vivisectionist, but it's not a anti-vivisection novel in same way as, say, Wilkie Collins's Heart and Science. (Incidentally, Beth reads Collins's The Moonstone at one point.) Rather, the middle of the novel is an extended and effective tale of a bad marriage, of Beth being psychologically abused by a terrible man, reminding me of Frances Hodgson Burnett's The Shuttle. Virginia Woolf famously formulated that a woman needs "a room of one's own" in order to write, and Beth has to go through an awful lot of work to find such a room for herself under the gaze of her husband, a doctor who controls her finances, belittles her intellect, reads her mail, won't let her talk to other people, carries on affairs, and accuses her of infidelity. It's horrifying, and very effectively done.
"Dr. Dan" works in a lock hospital, a hospital for the treatment of veneral disease in women, though Beth doesn't know this when they get married. You might think looking out for women's health is good, but I guess early feminists were against this because of the double standard. Women would essentially be locked up without trial, but nothing ever happened to the men they slept with, something Beth criticizes Dan for here, who can only justify it on the basis that "[i]t’s a deuced awkward thing for a man to be suspected of disease" (417). It ruins his prospects! But part of the reason Beth is against Dan's occupation also seems to be, unfortunately to a modern reader, moral revulsion: Beth calls him a "pander" (i.e., a pimp) and their entire social circle shuns both of them for it. The novel criticizes their social circle, but only on the basis that Beth didn't know she married such a man. But, I want to know: surely someone has to treat these women? The novel doesn't really offer an alternative, though everyone does cheer when the Contagious Diseases Act is repealed, closing the lock hospitals, in 1886.
Part of the book's opposition seems to rest on a thesis that some people absorb the morality of their surroundings, and when Dan looks at degradation all the time, he becomes degraded himself, and soon begins to delight in it, and delight in trying to degrade Beth alongside him. Also it gets kind of weird and eugenicist at one point, when Beth complains that Dan is working against nature by encouraging the survival of the unfittest: "Let the unfit who are with us live, and save them from suffering when you can, by all means; but take pains to prevent the appearance of any more of them. By the reproduction of the unfit, the strength, the beauty, the morality of the race is undermined, and with them its best chances of happiness" (458).
Like I said, it's not an antivivisection novel per se. Rather, vivisection is just a quick way to establish that Dan is just even more despicable than you thought: he has a secret lab in their home where he vivisects dogs, supposedly "in the interests of suffering humanity," but Beth rejoins that he does it "[i]n the interests of cruel and ambitious scientific men, struggling to outstrip each other" (456). She hopes for the day that vivisectors will be ejected from society, and that's vivisection's whole role here-- just a way to establish that Dan is really nasty.
Outside of this, the last 150 or so pages of the novel get kind of dull, unfortunately. There are a lot of discussions between Beth and her friends (many of whom originate in a different Sarah Grand novel, The Heavenly Twins) about what makes good novels and bad novels, which initially I found interesting, but soon got tedious, and then there's this whole thing about Beth nursing a sick lodger which I found uninteresting except for when it taught me the origin of the Salisbury steak. But on the whole this was an enjoyable read, for its depiction of a prodigious child, of a horrendous marriage, and of the limits of Victorian women's education. Plenty of jokes, too.… (més)