William R. Maples (1937–1997)
Autor/a de Dead Men Do Tell Tales: The Strange and Fascinating Cases of a Forensic Anthropologist
Sobre l'autor
Obres de William R. Maples
Dead Men Do Tell Tales: The Strange and Fascinating Cases of a Forensic Anthropologist (1994) 1,010 exemplars
Dead Men Do Tell Tales 1 exemplars
Etiquetat
Coneixement comú
- Data de naixement
- 1937-08-07
- Data de defunció
- 1997-02-27
- Gènere
- male
Membres
Ressenyes
This is a good but at times very graphic book, but as a person with a similar undergraduate degree, I can definitely appreciate this book!
I loved this book and it made me even more interested in the science of death and forensic anthropology. Dr Maples is a dear man, you can tell that in every word you read and by the respect he pays to the dead. Overall, this is a fascinating account of a long and richly full career and, indeed, life.
May he rest in eternal peace.
May he rest in eternal peace.
forensic anthropology, including ID of Romanovs and Pizarro
Potser també t'agrada
Autors associats
Estadístiques
- Obres
- 3
- Membres
- 1,013
- Popularitat
- #25,448
- Valoració
- 3.9
- Ressenyes
- 24
- ISBN
- 17
- Llengües
- 2
1 Expert Forensic Anthropologist
1 Utterly Unnecessary Chapter Regarding Baboons
Several Largely Irrelevant 'Soapbox' Chapters Regarding Suicide and His Moral Qualms Therewith, Child Abuse, Disdain for Psychology, etc.
3 Famous Historical Cases (Pizarro, Zachary Taylor, Romanovs)
including 2 Instances of Blatant Hypocrisy
namely 1 Overly Intricate Theory Ignoring the Most Likely Scenario Given the Evidence and
1 Case of Leaping to Identification Conclusions based on Insufficient Evidence
1 Intriguing Criminal Case (Meeks/Jennings)
1 Painfully Overabundant Ego Evidenced by:
Countless Instances of Ostentatiously Not Giving His Opinion as Irrelevant
An Equal Number of Instances of Giving His Opinion Despite an Utter Lack of Expertise in Pathology/Psychology/Other Discipline
The Short Version
When Maples focused on his actual cases, his discipline (and his conclusions) are generally quite interesting - though his arrogance put me off. Seriously, never tell me as a reader that something is 'beyond any doubt' - especially when the evidence is far from conclusive. Unfortunately for much of the book, Maples doesn't talk about his actual expertise and discipline - that of making skeletons 'talk'. Instead we're treated to snippets here and there interspersed with Maples views on suicides, sexual practices, child abuse, dismemberment, etc. While some of this might be link-able to his profession, most of these links are poorly done and don't really tie back to forensic anthropology. And I'm just not that interested in his soapbox.… (més)