Imatge de l'autor

David Nasaw

Autor/a de Andrew Carnegie

10 obres 2,274 Membres 33 Ressenyes 1 preferits

Sobre l'autor

David Nasaw is currently a professor of history and director of the Center for the Humanities at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, he lives in Manhattan. (Bowker Author Biography)

Inclou el nom: Nasaw David

Crèdit de la imatge: The Graduate Center, CUNY

Obres de David Nasaw

Etiquetat

Coneixement comú

Membres

Ressenyes

Skipped the eponymous essay because Carnegie was a social Darwinist. I read the essay on 'how to become a man of business', which I liked.
 
Marcat
jd7h | Hi ha 1 ressenya més | Feb 18, 2024 |
The best historical works convey moral complexity. By capturing the texture of the times in which events occur, they temper binary notions of right and wrong even as they lead the reader to more sustainable if less definitive judgments.

David Nasaw’s The Last Million is probably the best book I’ve read this year. It recounts the stories of the million souls we have come to know as the “displaced persons” of the Second World War, and of the responses of the United States, United Kingdom, and other non-Communist countries to their plight. The book is well-researched, cogently argued, and skillfully constructed, blending high politics with stories of individual survivors.

I deliberately use plural nouns here—stories; responses—to reinforce Nasaw’s fundamental point: there was no single DP-type but rather ethnic streams arriving in Germany for different reasons, from different places, and at different points in time. Each by its wartime conduct stood in a different relationship to good and bad, to moral justice. And the resettlement policies of the United States and other nations featured a similarly complex relation to justice. Simply put, the more Nazi-adjacent the ethnic group, the more likely its members were to find a new home in the West.

But that’s the end of a long and fascinating story, The beginning lies in the bloody and rapidly shifting borders between Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Soviet Union. If you were a Balt— Estonian, Latvian, Lithuanian— the devil’s bargain between the two dictators extinguished your freedoms and your national independence. Life under Stalin’s thumb was brutal, and when Hitler turned on his Communist ally in December 1941, many signed on with the new occupiers. That could mean anything from passive cooperation to gleeful Jew killing. And when the Red Army returned in 1944, many Balts fled west, to Germany, where the war’s end saw them among the last million housed in the d.p. camps.

A similar but not identical dynamic played out among ethnic Ukrainians and Poles, except here many found themselves in wartime Germany performing forced labor. After the war, like the Balts, they shared a common goal: to free their homelands from Soviet domination (not going to happen for a half century) and to prevent the Allies from shipping them home to Communist persecution. This last point was complicated by the Anglo-Americans’ Yalta commitment to return DPs whose homes lie within the Soviet Union. As the Yalta Agreement awarded the Soviet Union a goodly chunk of eastern Poland (and compensated Poland with a similar slice of eastern Germany) some Poles were subject to forced relocation, others not.

The situation with the Jews was even more complicated. In 1945, the handful of concentration camp survivors were housed in the same DP camps as the other ethnic groups. In practice, this frequently meant with the very same Nazi collaborators who had oppressed them in Hitler’s death camps. Many Americans were non-plussed, or worse. In his 1945 broadcast from the camps, the sainted Edward R. Murrow interviewed Buchenwald survivors, “identifying Englishmen, Frenchmen, Czechoslovakians, German Communists, ‘professors from Poland, doctors from Vienna, men from all of Europe….’” Only one group missing. Not so for General Patton, who pronounced the Balts “the best of the Displaced persons… extremely clean in all respects.” The Jews, by contrasts, “are lower than animals.”

Most European Jews who survived Hitler’s onslaught had fled east, to Russia. Some took Soviet citizenship. Stalin duly dispatched them westward as cannon fodder. Others he shipped to Siberia, or central Asia to work in war factories. After the war, Stalin permitted these Jews to return home, mostly to Poland. There they were greeted by old-school pogroms, most notably although not uniquely in Kielce, and at the doors of their former homes by new Polish residents who made it clear, at gunpoint, that their return was not welcome.

These Jews thus also fled west to the DP camps, but mostly arrived in 1946. This, argued some American policymakers, meant they weren’t displaced persons at all. The U.S. Department of State argued strenuously to close the border with Poland and halt the westward flow, but this position became untenable after the Kielce Pogrom became known in the West.

Nasaw is strong on life inside the DP camps, which emerged as societies of their own. Ultimately, though, the point was to resettle their residents elsewhere. Many nations faced labor shortages, but all proved choosy in just whom they would admit. Essentially, the Balts were considered most desirable and Jews the least, with the Ukrainians and Poles somewhere in the middle. Partly this was rank prejudice and partly the association of Jews with Bolshevism. (Plug here for Paul Hanebrink’s truly excellent A Spector Haunting Europe.)

One result was the years-long battle to shape the U.S. legislation permitting some DPs to resettle in America. With the Senate in particular determined to keep Jews out, the initial law fixed a December 1945 cutoff date for determining DP status, thus disqualifying 90% of the Jews in the camps. It also added a substantial quota for “agricultural workers.” One guess why.

The fate of the Jewish DPs would largely be determined elsewhere, by those waging Israel’s War of Independence. Here the same American diplomats who fought to keep Jews out of the DP camps then fought with even greater bitterness against partition and the establishment of Israel. Failing in that, the Department of State then tried—fun fact!—to inter male Jewish DPs of fighting age in what Nasaw likens to concentration camps, to prevent them from joining the fight in Palestine.

I am old enough, barely, to recall Apollo-era jokes about “Our Germans are better than their Germans.” This was a back-handed way of acknowledging, belatedly, that one consequence of America’s DP policy was the admission of flat out Nazis, Nazi collaborators, Nazi sympathizers, Iron Guard fascists and similar riff-raff to our shores. Emerging Cold War tension of course had much to do with this, but not all. U.S. intelligence needed the knowledge and skills it **thought** many of these anti-Communist emigres possessed. In truth most of them possessed neither, and the ones who did were more likely found among the Jews we hoped to keep out.

This account greatly simplifies the richness of a major historical work that is both authoritative and accessible to the general reader. 5 stars….
… (més)
 
Marcat
Dreyfusard | Hi ha 2 ressenyes més | Dec 3, 2023 |
This is a fantastic work depicting the culture of children's at the turn of the century in cities across America. The book was a huge source of inspiration and understanding as I went about directing Newsies. What I learned from this book helped my actors create an entire world on the stage.
 
Marcat
caseybp | Hi ha 1 ressenya més | Nov 21, 2023 |
Nasaw's social history of education focuses more on class and less on race - what you are left with is an incomplete picture, and the forces that restrict access to education for the working class are far less insidious than the slavemasters and segregationists.
 
Marcat
jonbrammer | Jul 1, 2023 |

Llistes

Premis

Potser també t'agrada

Autors associats

Estadístiques

Obres
10
Membres
2,274
Popularitat
#11,284
Valoració
3.9
Ressenyes
33
ISBN
48
Llengües
1
Preferit
1

Gràfics i taules