Imatge de l'autor
16+ obres 4,881 Membres 157 Ressenyes 8 preferits

Sobre l'autor

Jeffrey Toobin has been a staff writer at The New Yorker since 1993 and is also the legal analyst for ABC News. He received his A.B. from Harvard College and is a magna cum laude graduate of Harvard Law School. Toobin lives in New York City with his wife and two children. (Publisher Provided) mostra'n més Jeffrey Toobin was born in New York City in 1960. In 1982, he graduated magna cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts degree in classics, and earned a Truman Scholarship. In 1986, he graduated from Harvard Law School magna cum laude with a J.D. Toobin is the bestselling author of The Nine, Too Close to Call, A Vast Conspiracy, The Run of His Life and American Heiress. He is a staff writer at The New Yorker and the senior legal analyst at CNN. (Bowker Author Biography) mostra'n menys
Crèdit de la imatge: flickr user eschipul
(cropped by uploader)

Obres de Jeffrey Toobin

Obres associades

The Best American Magazine Writing 2003 (2003) — Col·laborador — 71 exemplars
The Best American Crime Reporting 2010 (2011) — Col·laborador — 57 exemplars
The Best American Political Writing 2004 (2004) — Col·laborador — 41 exemplars
The Best American Political Writing 2005 (2005) — Col·laborador — 37 exemplars
The Best American Legal Writing 2009 (2009) — Col·laborador — 18 exemplars
Reason and Passion: Justice Brennan's Enduring Influence (1997) — Col·laborador — 17 exemplars
Reader's Digest Today's Best Nonfiction 43 (1997) — Autor — 3 exemplars


Coneixement comú

Nom normalitzat
Toobin, Jeffrey
Nom oficial
Toobin, Jeffrey Ross
Data de naixement
Lloc de naixement
New York, New York, USA
Llocs de residència
New York, New York, USA
Harvard University (BA|1982)
Harvard University (JD|1986)
Sanders, Marlene (mother)
The New Yorker
Premis i honors
Emmy (2000)



This is an examination of Timothy McVeigh’s life; not only his infamous crime, but his radicalization that led to his bombing of the Oklahoma City Federal Building on April 19th, 1995. 168 men women and children were killed and thousands more were injured.

You probably remember photographs of the rage of the protesters surrounding young black children as they were escorted into segregated white schools during the 1960’s.I t’s important to know that the rage demonstrated in these photos has never truly vanished as certain groups see what they believe to be attacks on their way of life.

In the ‘90’s this angry anti-government rage had not vanished but had gone underground into such sources as the ads in the back of magazines like Soldier of Fortune which featured among other items a novel iconic to the haters called The Turner Diaries. Hate filled commentators such as Rush Limbaugh went from late night obscure radio stations to easier and more popular venues.

Ex military Tim McVeigh drifted into the culture of gun shows. There he found other disenfranchised people who swapped guns, angry literature and conspiracy theories.

Two events hardened McVeigh into committing to actions rather than theories. These were the Waco Branch Davidian disaster and President Clinton’s ban on assault weapons. Both of these convinced McVeigh that the government was out to eliminate the Constitutionally guaranteed right to have guns in order to quash dissenters.

It’s quite concerning is that many of McVeigh’s beliefs which were considered radical and aberrant in the 90’s have now become almost common among the far right. These include the necessity of a coming civil war/ revolution, taking the law into your own hands if you disagree with it, and violence against those who disagree with you.

Although most of the book focuses on Timothy McVeigh, It’also a well-written and thought-provoking view on how we got to the state of political and personal division we find ourselves in the United States today.
… (més)
streamsong | Hi ha 6 ressenyes més | Apr 28, 2024 |
This was one of the great nonfiction books that I have ever read. It combined readability with a good, comprehensive analysis of the last 20 years of the supreme court. Perhaps its greatest accolade is that after reading it I'm certain that I have a good foundational understanding of the workings and doings of the recent court, and that when it ended I really was hoping it was (magically) going to continue into the Obama years (after the book was published).

Overall, highly recommended if you're interested in the Judicial system at all. Ranks right up there with Team of Rivals as "Best Historical/Political Nonfiction"… (més)
mrbearbooks | Hi ha 77 ressenyes més | Apr 22, 2024 |
Entertaining read with an overall focus on personalities of the Court and the attempt of the Right, beginning around the time of Reagan's election and the founding of the Federalist Society, to take control of the Court and wrench it in their direction, which showed signs at the time of the book's publication following the 2007 term of finally coming to fruition.

Thanks to this intense effort, it seems impossible to credit that we will ever again be surprised by a Supreme Court justice's views on Constitutional issues, as once could happen. A Republican President today would not be allowed by his base to nominate someone like Sandra Day O'Connor, a favorite subject of this book, whose rulings on contentious issues were based not so much on any specific judicial philosophy as by a political interest in finding the "center" of an issue, guided by her usually unerring sense of where a majority of the American people were on it.

This led her, along with Souter and Kennedy, all Republican appointees, to shock the Republican base when they upheld Roe v. Wade, another favorite subject of this book, in the Casey decision, when it seemed more probable that it would be overturned. While O'Connor was driven by public opinion, Kennedy comes across as driven by an eagerness to be the center of attention, and to be dramatic.
Kennedy relished his public role and sought out the opinions that would make the newspapers. Seated at his keyboard typing furiously, Kennedy always labored most closely on the sections of opinions that might be quoted in the New York Times.
Souter, the ringleader of the effort to save Roe, was altogether different: shy, reclusive, cautious, with a strong respect for Court precedent. Also a famous bachelor.
Over the years, practically everyone Souter knew in Washington, including First Lady Barbara Bush, tried to fix him up. None succeeded. One of his fellow justices once prevailed on Souter to take a woman out to dinner, and she reported back that she thought the evening had gone very well - until the end. Souter took her home, told her what a good time he had, then added: "Let's do this again next year."
This 'betrayal' infuriated Antonin Scalia, who is often and easily infuriated, and who writes the most withering and insulting dissents of any justice. Not that his ultra-aggressive behavior often does him much good.
But by the time of Casey it was clear that Scalia's zest, passion, and intelligence did not translate into the most important thing one member of a court of nine could have - influence... [Kennedy] came to be repelled by Scalia's dogmatism.
The most extreme member of the court however is not Scalia, but rather Clarence Thomas. Thomas, seemingly forever embittered and angry by his difficulty during his confirmation process, stands unique among the justices in his entirely retro beliefs, wishing to turn back the clock completely to the pre-New Deal days, invalidating such now basic programs and laws as Social Security, a minimum wage, work hours and safety conditions, etc. If the founders didn't themselves know about it or explicitly advocate it, he believes, it's not Constitutional, despite the fact that over 200 years have passed.
Probably the greatest contrast between Thomas and his colleagues was that he fundamentally did not believe in stare decisis, the law of precedent... That no justice had expressed views like his for decades - and that his approach would invalidate much of the work of the contemporary federal government - disturbed Thomas not at all... At an appearance at a New York synagogue in 2005, Scalia was asked to compare his own judicial philosophy with that of Thomas. "I am an originalist," Scalia said, "but I am not a nut."
O'Connor tended to view people, events, happenings, as either "attractive" or "unattractive". By the end of her stay on the Court, she found that the GOP of her day was pretty much gone, replaced by the fiercely ideological and right-wing GOP of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, which she found appallingly "unattractive". Her replacement on the Court by Samuel Alito, a lawyer and judge raised professionally in the Federalist Society whose right-wing ideology could not be doubted, represents this new era.

There's lots of other good stuff in the book, such as how Ruth Bader Ginsburg believes the Constitution protects a woman's right to have an abortion under a different theory than Roe v. Wade, the Court's various rulings on church and state issues, how the dynamics on the Right doomed the Harriet Miers nomination when once she would have easily been confirmed, and profiling the smooth and ultra-competent poster boy of the Right, John Roberts, whose right-wing bonafides ironically only Miers seemed to have much doubt about.

While the last chapter comes close to concluding that the Right has finally won with Alito replacing O'Connor, giving them a solid 5-4 majority over the liberals, an afterword published to an edition a year later pulls back a bit on this theory, noting that Roberts was giving small signs of hesitation about the Court's shift to the right.

Later, of course, Roberts would provide the deciding vote in ruling Obamacare, the issue that most infuriated the Right since Roe, Constitutional. So, perhaps, the Court and its justices can continue to surprise us. Long may they frustrate the Right's ambitions.
… (més)
lelandleslie | Hi ha 77 ressenyes més | Feb 24, 2024 |
Homegrown is a powerful tour-de-force that contains extraordinarily pertinent information for American citizens in the current atmosphere of divisiveness, polarity, non-tolerance, racism and hate. It sheds light on the large number of right wing extremist groups and movements and largely explains their origins, growth and beliefs. It strips off the blinders we tend to wear and exposes plainly and explicitly the details of right wing extremism, given powerful boosts by the internet and Trump and poised, ready to and capable of toppling what's left of our fragile democracy and end this two plus century American experiment.

Here we learn in detail the story of Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber and the precursor to today's right wing extremist; such as those participating in the January 6, 2021 violent insurrectionist attack on the nation's Capitol. Timothy McVeigh was indoctrinated with right wing propaganda starting in high school. He became obsessed with the radical extremist talk show hosts of the time such as Rush Limbaugh who spewed their poison daily. In fact he fell down the right wing extremist rabbit hole completely, embracing their magazines, books, articles, etc. It was in fact a book of fiction sold through a mail order advertisement in a militant periodical that gave him the general outline and blueprint for the tragic bombing and loss of innocent lives that he was responsible for.

For me, it was hard to read, to face where we are and where we are heading as a country. Homegrown is so very informative, and one of the most important books out there in my opinion. Learning and understanding the history and motivations of the right wing extremist groups is imperative. As they say, knowledge is power; and I feel that only through knowledge will we have any hope of saving Democracy in America. As it is, it is hanging by a thread.
… (més)
shirfire218 | Hi ha 6 ressenyes més | Dec 5, 2023 |



Potser també t'agrada

Autors associats


També de

Gràfics i taules