Imatge de l'autor
35+ obres 6,570 Membres 17 Ressenyes 11 preferits

Sobre l'autor

David F. Wells is distinguished senior research professor at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, South Hamilton, Massachusetts, and an ordained Congregationalist minister. His many previous books include Above All Earthly Pow'rs, Losing Our Virtue, God in the Wasteland, and No Place for Truth.
Crèdit de la imatge: Boston.com

Obres de David F. Wells

Turning to God (1989) 495 exemplars
What is the Trinity? (2012) 75 exemplars

Obres associades

Why We're Not Emergent: By Two Guys Who Should Be (2008) — Pròleg, algunes edicions1,087 exemplars
The Modern Theologians: An Introduction to Christian Theology Since 1918 (2005) — Col·laborador, algunes edicions213 exemplars
Whatever Happened to the Reformation? (2001) — Pròleg — 208 exemplars
The Use of the Bible in Theology/Evangelical Options (1985) — Col·laborador — 109 exemplars
The Best in Theology, Vol. 1 (1987) — Introducció — 99 exemplars

Etiquetat

Coneixement comú

Nom oficial
Wells, David Falconer
Altres noms
衛爾素
Data de naixement
1939-5-11
Gènere
male
Educació
University of London
Trinity Evangelical Divinity School
University of Manchester
Yale University (Yale Divinity School)
Professions
professor
Organitzacions
Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary
Biografia breu
Dr. David F. Wells is Distinguished Research Professor at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary in South Hamilton, Massachusetts.

Membres

Ressenyes

4.5 stars.... great insight, explained clearly. helpful to understand what's beneath the surface of today's facade of "New Christian" culture.... and very reassuring to hold fast to Sound theology from God's Word
 
Marcat
Isaiah40 | Sep 7, 2021 |
This is a very unsettling book. Like Mark Noll's "The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind" Wells, a Professor at Gordon=Conwell Seminary, documents the decline in importance of sound theology. This book came out almost 20 years ago. If anything the problem has gotten worse. Men and women ignoring sound doctrine and in some cases, the Gospels. Look at the Tea Party, the GOP and current thinking about you-name-it.
 
Marcat
Steve_Walker | Hi ha 3 ressenyes més | Sep 13, 2020 |
Good paragraph i read this morning:

It would be quite mistaken, then, for us to think of the Bible as being simply a manual, or a set of instructions, or a textbook. It is so much more than this. It is the way in which God makes himself personally present to us. Undoubtedly, there are moments when God’s presence seems more real to us than at others, and there are times when we may, even though reading his Word, feel deserted. Job knew something of this loneliness, and so did the psalmists. However, we should be in no doubt that we are always engaging with, and being engaged by, God—engaging with his goodness, faithfulness, righteousness, holiness, love, and grace—when we are engaged with what he has said in his Word.

p. 213
… (més)
 
Marcat
gcornett | Hi ha 1 ressenya més | Sep 22, 2017 |
God in the Whirlwind by David Wells is an explanation of God's holy love, how God is so different, even opposite, from how our society has imagined Him to be. "However it happened, the external God has now disappeared and has been replaced by the internal God. Transcendence has been swallowed up by immanence. God is to be found only within the self. And once that happened, the boundary between right and wrong - at least as we had thought about these things - went down like a row of falling skittles. Evil and redemption came to be seen as the two sides of the same coin, not the two alternatives in life." Or as he also put it, "We want God's love without his holiness..." Wells addresses this erroneous viewpoint by explaining who God really is, and what His love is really like. I really liked his critique of our culture, how it has a 'therapeutic vision'. As Wells indicates, sadly, the 'church' has been going this way as well, following the spirit of the age they adapt the gospel to be about the fulfillment of our needs, our self-promotion and about our happiness now. The church needs to actually live like a community of 'aliens' and 'strangers' not assimilating the cultures of this world but living as citizens of Heaven, proclaiming God's Word accurately. We are to live as sanctified people, not worldly ones, as Wells puts it, we are to "work out what God, in his grace, has worked in" us, living as citizens of Heaven.

I'm sorry to say that there are several things in the books that prevent me from giving this book a higher rating. First, the author's view of Israel and covenant theology, or reformed theology bothered me too much, . I have read books before where I have disagreed with the author's 'Reformed' eschatology and yet have still liked the book, but that was not the case with this one. Here are a couple of instances, first, his statement that"...Paul argued that being a 'Jew' was no longer a matter of ethnicity....'is one inwardly...(Romans 2:29)' The logic here is inescapable. Those who have been justified on the basis of Christ's work, be they Jew or Gentile, constitute the one 'Israel of God'(Gal. 6:16)" Yes, being a Jew was not JUST a matter of ethnicity but it includes ethnicity, the true remnant of Israel is the elect descendants of Israel, the Israel of God. But Israel never becomes Jews and Gentiles. The Bible does not teach this. Jews and Gentiles do not cease to become ethnically Jews and Gentiles before God and on this earth just because they are united in salvation. Just as men and women do not cease to be men and women before God and on this earth because they are united in salvation. God saves Jews, Gentiles, men and women indiscriminately, He has not chosen to save only one people group, like the Jews, or one sex, or only people who are not slaves, He saves all kinds of people Galatians 3:28.

Another instance is the author's view of types....for example, he thinks that the Exodus of Israel from Egypt is a type of Christ and his work. I just don't see that connection made in the Bible, rather if there is any pictorial connection, I see the event mentioned in support of the view that God will one day bring all of the physical descendants of Israel back to their land(Jeremiah 16:14-15) and that they will be able to stay there because, unlike the first exodus of Israel and the Mosaic covenant God made with them, God will make their hearts new, will make the new covenant with them(Jer. 31:31-35,Ezek. 36:22-38). So when this mass exodus(initiated by God) from the countries where they have been scattered happens, they will return to their land for good(Amos 9: 14-15)because they will then be righteous, which was the requirement for their staying in the land.(Ezek. 36:22-38).

Besides the eschatology/Reformed typological view that kept clouding things, it was also mentioned three times that Abraham stumbled over the promises of God. This view is blatantly contradicted by Romans 4:20-21, speaking of Abraham, "yet, looking unto the promise of God, he wavered not through unbelief, but waxed strong through faith, giving glory to God, and being fully assured that what he had promised, he was able also to perform." Even in the event with Hagar, God's word does not say that that was a wavering of belief on Abraham's part. Of course, he was mistaken in how God would give him an heir, but it does not seem as though he struggled with unbelief of the promise.

To sum this up, these things, especially the typological views, just bothered me too much and were too distracting so I can only give this book three stars.

I'll end with one of the quotes/points that I Iiked, here he is critiquing recent and modern society, "When God was displaced from the center of life, revelation was replaced by natural reason, salvation by psychology and eschatology by social progress. However, even as this worldview was becoming dominant, it also began to disintegrate......What has lingered on is the substitution of psychology for salvation, and therefore the main thread of continuity across these decades, the thread that links the older modernist culture and our current postmodern culture, is the autonomous self. This is the self, the person in his or her inner being who is unrestrained by the past, by any authority, or social convention, or community, or any truth as something other than his or her own private opinion. They are not restrained by any God external to themselves. This is what our culture is validating all the time.

Many thanks to Crossway for sending me a free review ebook(My review did not have to be favorable).
… (més)
 
Marcat
SnickerdoodleSarah | Hi ha 1 ressenya més | Apr 13, 2016 |

Llistes

Premis

Potser també t'agrada

Autors associats

Estadístiques

Obres
35
També de
6
Membres
6,570
Popularitat
#3,736
Valoració
4.2
Ressenyes
17
ISBN
81
Llengües
3
Preferit
11

Gràfics i taules