2016 Hugo Eligible Novels

Descripció
This list contains novels eligible for the 2016 Hugo Award for Best Novel. Generally these are science fiction and fantasy stories of 40,000 words or more published in 2015. A full description of the eligibility requirements is here.
1
6,398 membres
389 ressenyes
4.1
12 Members
Vierran, Awfki, Rtrace, Scorbet, TimSharrock, majkia, lkmiller, KimarieBee, mathgirl40, souloftherose, gypsysmom, Settings,jain
Explicacions
mathgirl40: Very well written. A fairy tale with unexpected twists. Definitely a Hugo contender.
2
2,514 membres
131 ressenyes
4.2
3
4,818 membres
251 ressenyes
3.9
4
2,923 membres
249 ressenyes
4
7 Members
Vierran, majkia, GreenVelvet, amysisson, rhian_of_oz, mkbird, kara.shamy
Explicacions
GreenVelvet: One of the most original fantasy/reality merges I've ever read. Utterly unique. I can't stop thinking about it.
5
726 membres
52 ressenyes
3.8
6
1,035 membres
76 ressenyes
3.8
7 Members
psybre, AsYouKnow_Bob, Scorbet, majkia, aulsmith, mathgirl40, gypsysmom
Explicacions
aulsmith: A tour-de-force of speculative fiction, but I suspect folks with no background in Plato or Socratics might be a bit lost.
7
7,960 membres
362 ressenyes
4.2
8
619 membres
50 ressenyes
½ 3.7
5 Members
TimSharrock, mkbird, AnnieMod, mathgirl40, souloftherose
Explicacions
mathgirl40: This book was a real page-turner, with an interesting premise and lovely writing.
9
746 membres
55 ressenyes
½ 3.4
10
356 membres
25 ressenyes
4.1
5 Members
Lirleni, jain, mkbird, merrystar, mathgirl40
Explicacions
mathgirl40: A nice retelling of the Beauty and the Beast story, with unexpected twists.
11
1,857 membres
72 ressenyes
½ 3.6
12
1,271 membres
43 ressenyes
3.8
5 Members
Awfki, Rtrace, Scorbet, majkia, tottman
Explicacions
Awfki: I was really surprised he was able to wrap this up in a reasonable way. The book is typically Scalzi, fast paced, humorous (if you like snark and sarcasm) and generally a light read. My main complaint with this series is that the aliens don't feel at all alien. They speak with the same snark and sarcasm as the humans and that just feels off. It's still a fun read, just don't take it too seriously Also, I hesitate to call a popcorn read the "best" SF/F novel of the year. If a popcorn read is the best year had to offer it seems like it must have been a pretty off year.
tottman: Another great entry in the series. Well-written characters, thoughtful politics and plotting.
13
583 membres
37 ressenyes
½ 3.7
14
1,901 membres
91 ressenyes
½ 3.7
15
1,714 membres
106 ressenyes
3.8
16
881 membres
41 ressenyes
3.8
17
727 membres
32 ressenyes
3.8
18
200 membres
19 ressenyes
2.9
19
509 membres
27 ressenyes
½ 3.5
3 Members
majkia, rhian_of_oz, tottman
Explicacions
tottman: Creative plot and world building. Solid and interesting characters. Definitely worthy of Hugo consideration
20
69 membres
2 ressenyes
3.8
3 Members
karenb, asfi235, majkia
21
2,679 membres
116 ressenyes
4.2
22
877 membres
59 ressenyes
½ 3.7
3 Members
karenb, Vierran, majkia
23
1,063 membres
45 ressenyes
½ 3.6
3 Members
andyl, majkia, Settings
Explicacions
andyl: Extended eligibility - UK edition 2014, US edition 2015
Settings: This is eligable? If so, it's my favorite so far.
24
931 membres
44 ressenyes
½ 3.6
3 Members
andyl, karenb, jain
Explicacions
andyl: UK published in 2014 but extended eligibility (publ. in USA 2015)
25
591 membres
30 ressenyes
½ 3.7
3 Members
karenb, Vierran, Rtrace
26
1,721 membres
106 ressenyes
½ 3.7
27
727 membres
36 ressenyes
4
3 Members
Scorbet, majkia, mkbird
28
1,803 membres
94 ressenyes
3.8
29
5,134 membres
259 ressenyes
½ 3.6
2 Members
Rtrace, AnnieMod
30
2,107 membres
96 ressenyes
4
2 Members
Awfki, souloftherose
Explicacions
Awfki: It feels very fresh and original. It's a blend of elements strung together in new and interesting ways and a well told story with likable characters and a dash of humor. Butcher is obviously the servant of several cats because knows exactly what is going on in their evil little heads. Also, this is a much, MUCH better selection for him than the puppy-slated Dresden novel of last year. The Dresden stuff is good but it got old for me after book four or five. This is a totally different feel and much better than than any of the Dresden novels.
31
1,337 membres
68 ressenyes
½ 3.5
32
244 membres
24 ressenyes
½ 3.7
2 Members
andyl, Lirleni
Explicacions
Lirleni: has an interesting base for 'mancy (magic). Basically, a 'mancer has become so obsessed with it, that they can use their obsession to change reality, with a price.
33
303 membres
15 ressenyes
½ 3.5
3 Members
karenb, majkia, mathgirl40
Explicacions
mathgirl40: Not my favourite of Wilson's books, but well-written with good character development and interesting ideas. More speculative fiction than science fiction.
34
716 membres
34 ressenyes
4
2 Members
jain, souloftherose
Explicacions
jain: Extended eligibility: UK published 2014, US published 2015.
35
105 membres
6 ressenyes
½ 3.3
2 Members
andyl, majkia
36
199 membres
19 ressenyes
3.9
2 Members
andyl, kara.shamy
37
2,585 membres
150 ressenyes
½ 3.4
38
332 membres
17 ressenyes
½ 3.6
39
355 membres
18 ressenyes
½ 3.7
2 Members
jain, majkia
40
121 membres
37 ressenyes
½ 3.6
41
133 membres
10 ressenyes
3.8
2 Members
jain, majkia
42
495 membres
28 ressenyes
3.8
2 Members
andyl, majkia
43
1,499 membres
90 ressenyes
4
44
180 membres
8 ressenyes
½ 3.5
2 Members
andyl, majkia
45
4,949 membres
248 ressenyes
4.1
46
188 membres
11 ressenyes
4
Member
karenb
47
2,452 membres
98 ressenyes
4.2
2 Members
Rtrace, majkia
48
46 membres
3 ressenyes
½ 3.6
Member
Lirleni
49
3,412 membres
197 ressenyes
½ 3.7
3 Members
Scorbet, TimSharrock, majkia,andyl ,merrystar
Explicacions
andyl : light entertainment not Hugo-worthy
50
220 membres
9 ressenyes
3.1
Member
Rtrace
51
1,225 membres
81 ressenyes
½ 3.7
52
70 membres
2 ressenyes
4
Member
Scorbet
53
68 membres
9 ressenyes
4
54
882 membres
38 ressenyes
3.8
Member
Rtrace
55
216 membres
25 ressenyes
½ 3.5
Member
andyl
56
131 membres
4 ressenyes
½ 3.3
Member
jain
57
850 membres
40 ressenyes
½ 3.4
Member
karenb
58
74 membres
9 ressenyes
3.2
59
430 membres
17 ressenyes
½ 3.6
Member
andyl
60
47 membres
2 ressenyes
½ 3.4
61
3,472 membres
124 ressenyes
4.1
Member
Rtrace
62
1,011 membres
65 ressenyes
½ 4.3
Member
Tapetum,Awfki
Explicacions
Awfki : #8 in a series. Didn't think it was appropriate for the Dresden book last year, don't think it's appropriate for this. Also, the three (four?) Kate Daniels books that I read at my daughter's request were good, but they weren't award winning good.
63
444 membres
32 ressenyes
4
Member
majkia
64
255 membres
15 ressenyes
4
Member
majkia
65
127 membres
1 ressenya
½ 3.6
Member
majkia
66
3,562 membres
146 ressenyes
4.1
Member
majkia
67
48 membres
6 ressenyes
½ 3.7
Member
andyl,tottman
68
420 membres
15 ressenyes
3.9
69
321 membres
14 ressenyes
3.1
70
145 membres
10 ressenyes
3.8
71
142 membres
9 ressenyes
½ 3.7
72
111 membres
9 ressenyes
4.1
73
107 membres
1 ressenya
3.2
74
106 membres
6 ressenyes
½ 3.3
75
79 membres
2 ressenyes
½ 3.6
76
43 membres
4 ressenyes
½ 2.4
77
40 membres
5 ressenyes
½ 3.7
78
31 membres
1 ressenya
3
79
21 membres
6 ressenyes
3
80
19 membres
1 ressenya
½ 4.3
81
554 membres
42 ressenyes
3.8
Member
majkia,Awfki
Explicacions
Awfki : Read it, sort of enjoyed it, but it doesn't deserve a Hugo.
82
192 membres
35 ressenyes
½ 3.5
Member
majkia,AnnieMod
Explicacions
AnnieMod : Weaker than his previous novel - and not really Hugo worthy.
83
7,370 membres
324 ressenyes
3.9
3 Members
Scorbet, majkia, kara.shamy,andyl ,jain ,souloftherose ,Settings
Explicacions
andyl : light entertainment not Hugo-worthy
Settings : This is a light popcorny novel. Recommended if you want something fun, but it doesn't have any qualities I think make it worthy of the Hugos.
84
162 membres
18 ressenyes
½ 3.4
Explicacions
AnnieMod : It is very light, not really Hugo worthy in my opinion but it is still readable (and eligible)
85
48 membres
3 ressenyes
3.9
Explicacions
AnnieMod : Not really Hugo worthy on its own.
86
Explicacions
AnnieMod : Not really Hugo worthy on its own.
87
Explicacions
AnnieMod : Not really Hugo worthy on its own.
88
14 membres
3.1