Gothic films

En/na Gothic films (2) ha continuat aquest tema.

ConversesGothic Literature

Afegeix-te a LibraryThing per participar.

Gothic films

Aquest tema està marcat com "inactiu"—L'últim missatge és de fa més de 90 dies. Podeu revifar-lo enviant una resposta.

1Thulean
Editat: abr. 24, 2012, 3:32am

I thought that perhaps a thread on Gothic films could be a swell idea. Last night I watched Nosferatu the Vampyre which was directed by Werner Herzog. I am a fan of Nosferatu the silent German Expressionist film by F. W. Murnau and I had always thought that Herzog's film was a remake of the Murnau film but I was wrong. The Murnau film merely served as inspiration with Herzog's film containing plenty of homages. I thought Klaus Kinski played a wonderful Dracula.

Does anyone have any good Gothic films to recommend? I have seen several of the Hammer Horror films that I believe fall in this category.

BTW, has anyone seen The Monk?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Monk_%282011_film%29

2housefulofpaper
abr. 24, 2012, 2:36pm

I'm up for this. The Herzog Nosferatu must be one of the first horror films I ever watched (on late-night TV), not counting a (wonderful) season of Universal horror films in 1983 (I was 16, and came to the genre quite late).

I think I prefer the German-language version, Nosferatu: Phantom der Nacht. It's a slow-moving film, and there are many scenes where Herzog holds a shot for a long time. There's a risk of this becoming boring. In the German version the shots are held even longer, but the effect is to get over or break through the 'boredom barrier', and become almost hypnotic. It must be even more so on the big screen.

This isn't really playing the game, but when trying to think of 'Gothic' on screen, I keep coming back to a children's TV programme I caught a little of in 1986 - still, that was enough for it to stay with me. So despite it being small- rather than big screen, and unavailable, I would repectfully direct your attention to this Wikipedia entry for 'Tottie":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tottie:_The_Story_of_a_Doll's_House

As for something that should be available, how about:

The Ghoul (Boris Karloff, 1933 (I think) a UK Horror film almost as good as the early Universals. A beautifully clear print has recently surfaced and is available on DVD in the UK).

Blood on Satan's Claw AKA Satan's Skin

The BBC adaptations of MR James's stories from the 1970s - if any of these are available in the US (Jonathan Miller's 1968 'Omnibus' (an Arts Programme) Oh Whistle and I'll Come To You and 1972's A Warning to the Curious came out on DVD from the BFI.)

Actually, I have seen these uploaded on YouTube, and in addition a version of Le Fanu's Schalken the Painter. This is a poor-quality time-coded VHS copy that must have originated from the BBC Production Office. Still, it may be the only way we'll ever see it.

That's if it's still there - the Beeb jealously guards it copyrights!

3alaudacorax
Editat: abr. 24, 2012, 9:40pm

Slightly off-topic, but I've recently bought a DVD of Herzog's Cave of Forgotten Dreams - an enthralling documentary film, though I'm not sure if Herzog and his preoccupations aren't slightly getting in the way of a fascinating story. But it did strike me that these 30,000-year-old paintings or similar would make a great basis for a fictional story.

4Thulean
Editat: abr. 24, 2012, 11:50pm

Cave of Forgotten Dreams is great. I think we are very lucky that those paintings have lasted as long as they have. Truly one of mankind's treasures.

>2 housefulofpaper:

That Tottie series sounds interesting. The BBC seems to put out some great adaptions. I liked their version of Sweeney Todd that I saw about a year ago. I'll have to check some sites to see about the availability of those MR James adaptions along with the LaFanu. Thanks for the recommendations.

5housefulofpaper
abr. 25, 2012, 2:02pm

I've only seen the trailer for the latest version of The Monk, but I've seen the two earlier versions.

The 1972 film was shown on UK terrestrial TV some time in the last ten years (the BBC again - bless them!)
whilst the 1990 version starring Paul McGann was on satellite TV (Rupert Murdoch's Sky) around 2005.

6alaudacorax
abr. 26, 2012, 5:23am

I've just looked on UK and US Amazons and none of them seem available on DVD.

But now I'm going to be niggled all day wondering why 'The Bridges of Madison County' came up in the first page of search results for the UK site. And if you go down a couple of pages on the US site you get to 'The French Chef With Julia Child'.

Never fails to mystify me, Amazon.

7Thulean
abr. 26, 2012, 11:57am

>6 alaudacorax:

Some films have never been released on DVD (and will probably never see a Blu-Ray release) and in those cases I take the freebooting route sine the only other option is to allow them to remain unwatched. Not sure if that is the case with any of the films listed here though. Some of the BBC stuff you might be able to watch on Youtube. I have used Youtube to view several BBC documentaries.

8housefulofpaper
Editat: abr. 26, 2012, 5:27pm

BFI films (the British Film Institute) released two M. R. James titles about 10 years ago. Another BBC production brought out at the same time (Ghostwatch) has just been re-released by another company, so maybe the BFI let then all go out of print.

I've edited this post for fear I've inadvertently breached LT terms and conditions, or that BBC lawyers will come after me.

However, it can't hurt to list the BBC MR James adaptations, and the loose "Ghost Stories for Christmas" series of which they formed the major part.

(Please note a couple of story titles were slightly changed from James's originals. The programmes are between 35 to 50 minutes long.)

Whistle and I'll Come to You (1968) film, b/w
The Stalls of Barchester (1971) film, colour (as are all the following)
A Warning the the Curious (1972) film
Lost Hearts (1973) film
The Treasure of Abbot Thomas (1974) film
The Ash Tree (1975) film
The Signalman (1976) film (Dickens, not M R James)
Stigma (1977) film? (this is an original modern-day screenplay)
The Ice House (1978) film? (another original screenplay, and apparently not highly regarded)
A View From A Hill (2005) video (but processed to look "filmic")
Number 13 (2006) video ("filmic")


9housefulofpaper
maig 7, 2012, 9:10am

A short animated film, "Alma":

www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZmLHQEMfm0&feature=related

10housefulofpaper
maig 29, 2012, 5:38pm

You may suspect I've lost my marbles, but I'm going to suggest "Carry on Screaming".

11alaudacorax
maig 29, 2012, 7:21pm

Frying tonight!!!

12alaudacorax
maig 29, 2012, 7:22pm

Do you mind if I smoke?

13Thulean
maig 29, 2012, 9:03pm

I recently watched Tales of Terror with Vincent Price. I just love the costumes, sets and atmosphere in these films.

14housefulofpaper
juny 30, 2012, 11:15am

I was aware that there had been a well-regarded Russian (Soviet-era) Sherlock Holmes TV series, but had never seen any more than one or two grainy publicity photos or stills. However, the series' 1981 adaptation of The Hound of the Baskervilles has recently been released on DVD in the UK.

It's a handsome production (shot on film) and the plot is faithful to the novel (the running time of 146 minutes allows for this). Vasily Livonov's Holmes is more genial than most modern portrayals (and is less sharp-featured, bearing a faint resemblance to the English actor Peter Egan). Vitaly Solomin is a very good, youngish Watson.

Costumes and sets aim for fidelity to the late-Victorian English setting. There are a couple of deviations. Sir Henry seems to be presented as a caricature of an American (he's been living in Canada, you'll recall) and Laura Lyons is presented as a vamp (perhaps her "fall" had to be presented in stronger terms for it to make sense to the Russian audience - a women doesn't have to fall very far at all, in Victorian society, to be a "fallen woman"; in the terms of Conan Doyle's fictional world, at any rate.

As this production was filmed in the USSR, the locations cannot always replicate 19th Century London or the environment of Dartmoor. On their own terms they are effective, often impressive.

On a technical level, it doesn't say anywhere on the packaging but I assume the 2 DVDs are coded for Region 2. It does say that it's authored from a DigiBeta source; this may explain a couple of moments where the picture breaks up in shivers and blocky artifacting.

One the whole this is one of the best screen versions of Doyle's novel I've seen, allowing for it's idiocyncrasies.

15alaudacorax
jul. 1, 2012, 6:49am

I'm quite intrigued by that. I've put it on my Amazon wishlist, if only for curiosity's sake.

Incidentally, in hunting for that I've been quite astonished at how many versions are available. I even found one with Peter Cook and Dudley Moore! I have absolutely no memory of that one coming out.

16alaudacorax
Editat: jul. 1, 2012, 7:16am

#8 - I distinctly remember composing a post on 'The Signalman'; obviously I didn't post it - must have got distracted.

Anyway, I just wanted to give it a recommendation - brilliant performance by Denholm Elliot. I seem to remember the BBC showing it again on his death as a tribute to him, so it must be a widely-admired piece.

I probably saw most of the pieces you listed as that was a period - my twenties - when I really loved that kind of stuff, but 'The Signalman' and 'Whistle and I'll Come to You' are the only ones that seem to have really stuck in my mind down through the years - especially 'The Signalman'.

The television companies must have so much good-quality, old stuff that they're presumably unlikely to show again: I wish they'd work up some sort of system analogous to book-publishing's 'print on demand'.

17housefulofpaper
jul. 1, 2012, 10:15am

>15 alaudacorax:

The Peter Cook/Dudley Moore film is reputed to be dreadful, unfortunately. But, your mentioning it did remind me of Gene Wilder's film, The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes' Smarter Brother. The film features a couple of blink-and-you'll-miss-him seconds of Douglas Wilmer as Sherlock.

Wilmer played Holmes for one season on the BBC in the 1960's ('season' would not have been UK television usage at the time, of course) and is still held by some to be the best screen Holmes ever. Unfortunately I've never seen any of these stories. They may even no longer exist (although, Peter Cushing replaced Wilmer in a second BBC series, and his stories not only exist, but have been released on DVD. So maybe they have survived).

Even Wilmer's one official BBC publicity photo fails to give any idea of him as Holmes, as it makes him look more like Roddy McDowell than himself. So the film may be the only indication of what his performance on TV was like.

18housefulofpaper
jul. 1, 2012, 10:37am

> 16

A company called Network DVD have been releasing masses of material from the old ITV companies (that's the commercial television companies that have been broadcasting in the UK in competition with the publicly-funded BBC since the mid-'50s, for anyone reading who didn't know).

There's a lot of sitcoms and children's TV (some of the latter may be of interest - Children of the Stones or the surviving 3rd series of Ace of Wands, say) but also material that should fit squarely here, for example:

- All the surviving episodes from Mystery and Imagination.
- A 1979 updated Casting the Runes (includes as a bonus a short adaptation of Mr Humphreys and His Inheritance, made for schools, which has much of the atmosphere of the BBC Ghost Stories for Christmas).
- The Rivals of Sherlock Holmes, the first series of which includes Donald Pleasance as Carnacki the Ghost Finder in a version of The Horse of the Invisible.

These are all coded for Region 2, I should mention.

19housefulofpaper
jul. 1, 2012, 4:30pm

I should have said that the Region 2 DVDs I mentioned earlier are also PAL rather than NTSC.

20housefulofpaper
jul. 1, 2012, 5:09pm

I have just discovered - flitting aimlessly around the Internet - that a multi-disc box set of BBC M R James adaptations has been released. IN AUSTRALIA!

It's encoded for Region 4. It apparently includes all the M R James "Ghost Stories for Christmas" (including the two "Noughties" titles) plus the 1968 and 2010 (or 2011- not sure) versions of "Oh Whistle..." (I haven't said anything about the new version because I recorded it off-air but haven't seen it yet).

The box set also includes "Christopher Lee's Ghost Stories for Christmas" from (I think) 2000, which was Lee reading M R James stories, in character as James.

Non-James stories are not included, so no "Signalman" and no chance to assess the two original screenplays (although since I posted above, the whole of "Stigma" appeared on YouTube, so I've seen that now. Only "The Ice House" remains a mystery).

The Box Set is distributed by Shock Records, if it's worth your while getting hold of Region 4 discs.

21Thulean
jul. 1, 2012, 9:53pm

I recently watched Hands of the Ripper which is one of Hammer Studios films I had not seen before. I guess they still have quite a few film I have not seen that I will make my way through slowly. HotR is an interesting 'What if' sort of take. It is about the daughter of Jack the Ripper who has recurring visions of her father murdering her prostitute mother and having her own series of murders that are set off by those memories being triggered.

>18 housefulofpaper:

Mystery and Imagination sounds like a good one to keep my eye out for.

22housefulofpaper
jul. 2, 2012, 1:59pm

> 21

Yes, Hands of the Ripper is a good one.

My brother got me the coffee mug for Christmas (no comment on my character, I hope!)

23housefulofpaper
jul. 8, 2012, 12:29pm

Return to Glennascaul: A Story That Is Told in Dublin

This is a short film from 1952 credited to Irish actor-managers Hilton Edwards and Michael MacLiammóir (founders of Dublin's Gate Theatre Company), and notable for the presence of Orson Welles as star and narrator.

At the time of production Edwards and MacLiammóir were involved in Orson Welles' Othello. This was a project subject to many delays, mostly financial in nature but including the fact that Edwards and MacLiammóir had to return to Dublin for their company's regular season.

The feel of the film is very like radio dramas of the time (which of course Welles had plenty of experience of), with Welles as the host who recounts the story rather than being at the centre of events. The fact that all the sound was clearly added in post-production added to this feeling, for me.

The film starts on the set of Othello but swiftly moves to Ireland. Welles (as himself) is driving into Dublin when he stops to assist a man whose car has broken down. He gives the man a lift, and during the journey the man tells Welles about a supernatural experience he had, at the very spot where his car broke down tonight...

We see this story played out in flashback, with a voiceover narration from Welles. The story is quite slight (and very similar to Oliver Onions' short story "The Cigarette Case"). Despite almost nothing happening, the film does have an authentic feeling of the uncanny. It was well-thought of enough to be nominated for an Academy Award, and then disappeared from circulation for the best part of 40 years.

In the early 90's a producer called Richard Gordon acquired the film and made it available again (with an introduction by Peter Bogdanovich and a new overall title, "A Tribute to Orson Welles".

I know that this version has been aired on British television at least once, but it's now available commercially, as the bonus feature to a 1955 portmanteau film called Three Cases of Murder (Odeon Entertainment, Region 0). Welles is also in this "main feature".



24housefulofpaper
ag. 9, 2012, 7:21pm

> 20

I'm sure you're sick to death of this subject now, but I will just say that the BBC M.R. James adaptations, plus "The Signalman" and the two original plays, are scheduled for release from BFI films on DVD between August and October, on 5 separate discs, and then available in one box-set in October.

These are, needless to say, Region 2 PAL discs, but if you're overseas (from my perspective) and have a multi-region DVD player you may be able to view them (as a comparison, I have a 10-year old television set that's happy to display Region 0 NSTC discs).

25alaudacorax
ag. 10, 2012, 7:12am

#24 - On UK Amazon, they're giving the release date as October 22nd - when the nights will have drawn in and just about the time round here when the weather tips over into colder, wintry mode - perfectly timed for those cold, dark evenings.

Quite a reasonable price for a five-disc set, too.

I'm wishlisting that.

["I'm not sure, but I have it in the back of my mind that BFI releases tend to be in limited quantities. Do they tend to sell out; or have I got my wires crossed somewhere?" Should I pre-order or wait till it's released in the hope of finding a cheaper deal?"

"Stop it!"

"Am I being a cheapskate?"

"Yes, you are - pre-order it!"

"Okay - I'm pre-ordering it."

"Honestly! The way you faff about with these things - it's only a couple of quid!"

"Sorry!"

"I should think so!"
]

Sorry about that - just thinking aloud.

["Just shut up and post!"

"Sorry."
]

26pgmcc
ag. 10, 2012, 10:08am

I am not sick of this subject. You have reminded me of a couple of Christmas eves when I still lived at the family home and watched some of those programmes on their first broadcast.

"The Signal Man" and "The Stalls of Barchester" are ones I particularly remember. I also remember watching Tales of Mystery and Imagination.

27housefulofpaper
ag. 10, 2012, 7:03pm

> Thanks for the reassuring.encouraging words. I first saw three of these stories in similar circumstances. They were repeated over three Christmas Eves in the '90s.

28housefulofpaper
ag. 23, 2012, 6:31pm

Following on from the discussion of the BBC Ghost Stories, I was too impatient to wait for the box set, so I can confirm the full contents of disc one:

"Whistle and I'll Come to You" (1968) (42 mins)
"Oh, Whistle and I'll come to You, My Lad" (the original story) read by Neil Brand (over a still from the 1968 film) (42 mins)
Introduction by horror writer Ramsey Campbell (16 mins)
Ramsey Campbell reading his M R James-inspired story "The Guide" (27 mins)
Campbell's stuff is recorded in a horribly echoey acoustic. The story, in particular, is best listened to on headphones.

All the above was on the BFI 2001 release. The following are new:

"Jonathan Miller and Christopher Frayling discuss Whistle and I'll come to You" (3 mins)
It's actually the opening of the 1968 film (Miller's spoken introduction), then two very short unused bits of interview from a 2012 BBC Documentary on Miller; first Miller, then Frayling (separately, not discussing the film "head to head").

"Whistle and I'll come to You" (2010)
This got quite a mauling when it first aired, and it actually put me off watching an off-air copy that I made. It's better than I'd been led to expect from its reception, and sad as well as scary. I think the ending does let it down, though. I won't say any more though - no spoilers.

A 26-page booklet.

29housefulofpaper
set. 19, 2012, 2:30pm

> 28

More on the BBC Ghost Stories DVD releases:

Disc two contains:
'The Stalls of Barchester'' (1971)
'A Warning to the Curious' (1972)
Both films have 10-minute introductions by director Lawrence Gordon Clark (evidently he's being interviewed and his answers edited together to remove the questioner.)

There are also the versions of these stories from 'Ghost Stories for Christmas with Christopher Lee' (2000) in which Lee (or rather, Sir Christopher, plays not M R James but the narrator of M R James's stories, for whom the events are real. (The relevant article in the booklet makes this clear despite the voiceover in the opening scene.)

A 43-page booklet.

You might want to note that the extra from the 2002 release of 'A Warning to the Curious', a reading of the story by Michael Hordern, does not appear on the new disc.

Disc three
'Lost Hearts' (1973)
'The Treasure of Abbot Thomas' (1974)
'The Ash Tree' (1975)

All stories have introductions from Lawrence Gordon Clark in the same format as on the previous disc.

A 30-page booklet.

Disc four
'The Signalman' (1976)
'Stigma' (1977)
'The Ice House' (1978)

The first two stories have introductions from Lawrence Gordon Clark in the same format as on the previous disc. 'The Ice House' was directed by Derek Lister and has no introduction.

A 22-page booklet.

The 2002 release of 'The Signalman' included a reading of the story by John Nettleton. It's not included here.

30alaudacorax
set. 19, 2012, 4:35pm

I did order this box set, after all.

Currently, they're saying I should have it at the start of November.

31housefulofpaper
set. 19, 2012, 6:08pm

Just too late for Halloween!

I'm hoping that the other two Christopher Lee stories are bonus features on disc five.

The essays in the booklets are very good (i.e. I tend to agree with them!)

32housefulofpaper
set. 23, 2012, 4:34pm

Harking back to the earliest posts here, I have a little more information on the 1990 version of 'The Monk' starring Paul McGann.

It's also been released under the titles 'Seduction of a Priest' and 'The Final Temptation'. It's directed by Francisco Lara Polop. Somebody is currently trying to sell a VHS copy on Amazon.co.uk for £46.00.

33housefulofpaper
Editat: set. 30, 2012, 2:54pm

following on from # 32

I'm currently watching the latest version of 'The Monk'.

It's not currently available in the UK, but I've been able to order a German Region 2 DVD of Ken Russell's 'The Lair of the White Worm'. On YouTube (search for 'Trailers From Hell'), the producer describes it as 'Wildean'. Well, we'll see...

34alaudacorax
oct. 30, 2012, 6:37am

#24, #25 - Box-set just arrived. Quite excited.

Okay - I can work up a near nervous breakdown about practically anything: I haven't read one or two of the stories - now I'm stressing over whether I read them first or watch them first!

35MarkCarver
oct. 31, 2012, 12:41am

I wasn't a fan of the new version of The Monk with Vincent Cassel. The book is one of my all-time favorites in any genre, and I was hoping for the same face-clawing bleakness and terror in the movie, but it took a lot of liberties (most likely for budget considerations). The acting was quite good, but as a whole, it lacked a lot of atmosphere.

36housefulofpaper
oct. 31, 2012, 3:50am

> 34 There's a lot to be said for watching a horror film and not knowing how it ends!

37housefulofpaper
oct. 31, 2012, 4:15am

> 35

I thought the film worked well enough on its own terms. It's a long time since I read the novel, so I wasn't in the position of constantly being brought up short by changes to the story, dropped subplots and characters, and things like that.

38alaudacorax
Editat: oct. 31, 2012, 5:27am

#24, #25, #34 - I was a little surprised that the BBC 'Ghost Stories for Christmas' box set doesn't include 'Schalken the Painter'.

It was broadcast on December 23rd '79, but the BBC seems to have classed it as part of their 'Omnibus' rather than their 'Ghost Story for Christmas' series; but the same seems to go for 'Whistle and I'll Come to You', and that's included.

Oddly, if you search UK Amazon for it this box set is the only hit you get. In reality, it doesn't seem to be available on DVD.

ETA - If you search US Amazon for it you get 'Doctor Who' Season 5 - work that one out!

39housefulofpaper
oct. 31, 2012, 2:32pm

There's plenty of comment online, bewailing the fact that 'Schalken the Painter' has never been released on commercial DVD. More surprising to me, in regard to this set, is that one episode of the Christmas 2000 Christopher Lee series has been omitted from the 'extras' (I couldn't find it on YouTube either - surely 2000 is far too late for the BBC to be losing/wiping programmes?).

40housefulofpaper
oct. 31, 2012, 2:37pm

Oh - Doctor Who season 5 included the Richard Curtis episode about Vincent Van Gogh. So both include real-life painters and are scary (to a greater or lesser degree!). It's a bit of a stretch, but it is a connection.

41housefulofpaper
nov. 4, 2012, 11:37am

The Uninvited (1944)

This apparently has some reputation as (possibly) the first Hollywood film to treat ghosts seriously in a drama. It leans very much towards the mainstream/romantic side of the gothic - perhaps that's why I wasn't really aware of it (unlike notionally more obscure or even lost films whose memory is kept fresh in books and magazine articles illustrated with a few familiar stills - 'London after Midnight', 'Phantom of the Opera', 'Black Sunday', say).

It's just become available on DVD in the UK. Brother and sister Roderick and Pamela Fitzgerald (Ray Milland and Ruth Hussey) discover a clifftop mansion while on holiday in Cornwall. Pamela (reminded of their childhood home) persuades her brother that they should buy the house. It's haunted, naturally, but the danger isn't primarily directed at them. It's directed towards Stella (Gail Russell), the orphaned daughter of the previous owners, and a woman that Roderick finds himself falling in love with...

Critic Jonathan Rigby's judgments are generally pretty sound, but I think he was a little harsh in his estimation in American Gothic: sixty years of horror cinema: "wrapped in so suffocating a mantle of faux-english gloss that it turns its tale...into a peculiarly twee after-dinner anecdote." Points against the film are it general air of a 1940s 'women's picture', and Ray Milland's wisecracking sometimes breaks the tension instead of coming over as 'whistling in the dark'; but there are enough moments where it succeeds in capturing the atmosphere of a Val Lewton horror film.

As an aside, Stella by Starlight (later to become a jazz standard) was created for this film - Milland's character is a composer.

42LolaWalser
nov. 4, 2012, 7:30pm

The Mask of Satan (1960) is a not-bad vampire movie with Barbara Steele, interesting location, and direction by Mario Bava.

I never expected YouTube to compete for my viewing time, but the searchability and unexpectedness of finds make it seriously addictive.

43housefulofpaper
nov. 4, 2012, 8:42pm

Oh, I think The Mask of Satan and Black Sunday are the same film. I had a VHS copy back in the '90s, when a lot of films that I'd only known as plot summaries and a handful of stills started to become available. There are still some I've never seen, or not for nearly three decades.

Since my last post, I've read that The Uninvited is currently only available in the UK. I've always assumed (mistakenly, it seems) that where DVD releases are concerned the US has everyone we get and more, and what we do get is shorn of extras.

I value YouTube for old TV and films and music videos - in fact as a free international b******s-to-copyright audio-visual library. The people ranting against evolution or falling off skateboards - what it was originally designed for - I can cheerfully do without. Or at least stop recommending them, YouTube!

The reason I'm here at this ungodly hour (1:33 GMT) is that I looked on Amazon.co.uk earlier and The Stone Tape is listed as another BBC Ghost Story for Christmas, due (I think) 26 November.

So if the series is being extended maybe, just maybe, Schalken the Painter will get a release at some point.

I'll also mention again, for completists, the Network DVD of the updated ITV Casting the Runes from 1979 (stars Edward Petherbridge, Jan Francis, Iain Cuthbertson; it's shot on a mixture of studio videotape and location film (like 'classic' Doctor Who)). It also features a made-for-schools Mr Humphreys and his Inheritance from 1976, and a documentary from 1995.

Time for bed!

44alaudacorax
nov. 5, 2012, 6:28am

Just playlisted The Mask of Satan but I couldn't find The Uninvited. Perhaps I'll pick up the DVD some time. I think I've seen both, but so long ago I hardly remember them so I'll be watching 'fresh', as it were. Never seen The Stone Tape and I gather it's very good; but lousy quality on YouTube, so I'll have to look out for that, too.

I like YouTube but I'm getting really annoyed lately by their continually trying to get hold of my mobile phone number and me to use my real name. It was a sad day when Google took over YouTube. Tangent - sorry (but it's a sore point).

I watched another from my 'Ghost Stories for Christmas' box set, last night - Stigma.

I wasn't impressed - a quite sketchy storyline and in large part an excuse to get a serious actress to show her breasts. This was 1977 and around that time, I remember, they'd stick bare breasts in almost anything, so I can't say they were to cover the shortfalls in the story; but, that attitude of 'it's legitimate nudity because this is a really serious drama and it's really in context' makes me uncomfortable. So often it's hypocrisy and, of course, it makes you complicit in it. I'm not a prude (oh ye gods - a negatively-loaded cliché if ever there was one - shades of Mary Whitehouse), but I prefer honest, upfront titillation.

45alaudacorax
nov. 5, 2012, 7:02am

#44 - I watched another from ...

I wrote that under the impression I'd already posted here about watching 'The Signalman' - obviously I hadn't, so ...

It really was as good as I remembered. It's faithful to the story - which I read for the first time immediately after watching - no liberties taken at all.

Denholm Elliot was painting the portrait of the signalman with a really subtle brush, as it were - nothing showy or over the top - and his performance convinces me he was perfectly familiar with Dickens's story (though he didn't actually look much like Dickens's signalman; but that's not at all important).

If I have any criticism it's that Bernard Lloyd, who played 'The Traveller' (equivalent of the narrative voice of the written story), wasn't quite up to Elliot's weight in terms of acting (broader brush strokes?). He was perfectly adequate, though, and it seems a bit carping even as I'm writing it.

Reading the story was something else again, though - a tremendous piece of work, I thought. But that's for elsewhere ... actually, I was so impressed I'm working up a post about it for my blog.

46housefulofpaper
nov. 5, 2012, 1:31pm

> 44

But, if you're going to "do" body horror, don't you need a body? I was more impressed by this story than I expected to be, given the reputation of the two modern day stories. Also, I first saw it on YouTube back in the spring. The whole programme had unexpectedly been uploaded and it had the air of an unexpected treat.

It seemed to be a very "70s" story, insofar as a male writer was obviously trying to address "women's issues" and doing it via some familiar ingredients: the domestic round, friction between mother and teenage daughter, unobservant/useless men, haunted bronze age tomb ... well maybe that last one was not quite so familiar (but if it was going to turn up anywhere, it would be in the 1970s!).

The YouTube comments, by the way, were split between surprise at actual bare breasts on YouTube, and indignation at the cavalier treatment of an archeological site. It must be the influence of Time Team.

47LolaWalser
nov. 5, 2012, 1:43pm

Speaking of the seventies and bare this and that on YouTube, Britt Ekland's bottom adds quality to The Wicker Man (1973, with Christopher Lee).

48alaudacorax
nov. 6, 2012, 3:36am

#46, #47 - Now, I've absolutely no problem with the nudity in The Wicker Man - it 'belongs', as it were - I thought the bare breasts in Stigma were just plain contrived. Anyway, if you're putting Christopher Lee in a long wig and a hippy-girl's dress you can surely get away with anything else.

Incidentally, it wasn't really Britt Ekland's bottom.

The story goes that she had no problem at all with showing her breasts, but absolutely refused to show her bottom - didn't like her bottom, apparently. So they waited till she was safely off set one night and secretly sneaked in a stripper and filmed the scene with her. Ekland didn't find out till after filming was finished, and is said to have been furious about it.

Just my curiosity, but I've always been mildly intrigued as to the exact reasons why she was furious. It's not as if the use of body-doubles was unusual.

The irony is that the scene has become iconic in a 'laddish' kind of way and 'Britt Ekland's' bottom has been referenced in a number of Brit comedy shows and so forth.

Back to Stigma: I must be 'Time-Teamed', too - my first thought was, "Whoa! They can't do that to an archaeological site!"

And what about the onions? I'm going to have to watch it again to try to work out the onions - they've been niggling at me.

49LolaWalser
nov. 7, 2012, 12:12pm

Really, must've been wicked cunning editing, she's shown mostly in full figure! Splendid bottom whozeverz it was, though. Deserved billing of its own.

50housefulofpaper
nov. 8, 2012, 5:12pm

I would have mentioned The Wicker Man a long time ago, but I thought it might be too obvious a choice in such well-informed company. I went for Blood on Satan's Claw as the No. 2 '1970s British folk-horror classic'.

51housefulofpaper
des. 9, 2012, 6:08pm

The BBC's 'Ghost Stories for Christmas' had some competition in 1974. Two TV films that aired over the Christmas holiday on the commercial ITV network have been brought out on DVD, under the umbrella title 'Haunted".

They consist of 50-minute adaptations of 'The Ferryman' by Kingsley Amis and 'Poor Girl' by 'the other' Elizabeth Taylor (At Mrs Lippincote's, etc.).

'The Ferryman' is clearly an offshoot of Amis' novel The Green Man, in that a novelist who has written a successful 'literary' horror novel (the counterpart to The Green Man) finds himself living in the setting of his novel.

'Poor Girl' is about an Edwardian governess taking up a post in a house where there are
unspoken tensions ("not in front of the servants")between the master of the house and his wife, and their son is creepily knowing (Echoes of 'The Turn of the Screw' here).

In truth, I don't think these are as successful as the best of the BBC films, but my guess would be that it's because of the inherent difficulty in dramatising modern fiction. What works on the page may be too allusive and ambiguous to be easily dramatised, and on the other hand, what would be a throwaway line of dialogue on the page can clumsily signpost the way the whole plot is to unfold when spoken by an actor. 'Poor Girl' suffers from the first problem, 'The Ferryman' from the second.

Region 2 PAL DVD, 100 minutes duration (no extras) from Network DVD.

52housefulofpaper
des. 24, 2012, 1:12pm

http://islandofterror.blogspot.co.uk/?zx=5ac8cc629a722edc

One of the blogs I've started following has put up some screen grabs and a brief appreciation of the BBC Ghost Story for Christmas 'A Warning to the Curious'. Lovely!

(there's a small mistake - the story was shot on 16mm film, not videotape).

Happy Christmas, all!

53HarryMacDonald
des. 24, 2012, 2:58pm

Please don't think me too much of nit-picker, but clarification of thought -- and language -- is always in order. Since when does "Gothic" equal "horror" equal "ghost"? Of-course, I remember what happened to Socrates when he bugged people once too often about defining their terms, and I'm certainly no Socrates. Anyway, the films of Louis Feuillade richly replay investigation -- when they can be found. Happy trembling, friends -- and of-course, Happy Christmas!

54Nicole_VanK
des. 24, 2012, 3:12pm

While I would have preferred it if the word had remained reserved for things pertaining to Ostrogoths and Visigoths (and, if need be, their language), the word "Gothic" has a long tradition of spinning out of control.

55HarryMacDonald
des. 24, 2012, 4:02pm

. . . like those pesky Goths themselves!

56Nicole_VanK
des. 24, 2012, 4:07pm

Indeed ;-)

57housefulofpaper
des. 24, 2012, 5:18pm

> 53

Well, in defence of ghosts, one appears (and a giant one, at that) in The Castle of Otranto.

Feuilade's Fantomas and Les Vampires are available on DVD in the UK. The way the camera holds still on a scene for minutes on end, no cuts, and suddenly something genuinely startling happens, is almost like watching CCTV footage. It's curious that something from so early in cinema history can anticipate something so ubiquitous today.

58.Monkey.
des. 25, 2012, 4:25am

>57 housefulofpaper: No one said there can't be ghosts. It's just that something having ghosts doesn't mean that it's Gothic.

59pgmcc
des. 25, 2012, 8:40am

Interesting topic, the meaning of Gothic, and it various variations and loose usage.

housefulofpaper, The Swan River Press discussion on Longsword by Thomas Leland, first published in 1762, included the claim that Longsword qualifies as a gothic novel that pre-dates The Castle of Ontranto by two years. It has an evil Monk.

Albert Power, the editor, gave a brief definition of what he considered to be gothic which included family secrets, revenge or some such motivation, and a medieval setting, amongst other things. The supernatural was not an essential ingredient in his opinion.

By the way, a very Gothic Christmas to one and all.

60housefulofpaper
des. 25, 2012, 5:52pm

To my mind, a big part of the problem when defining "Gothic" is that, like "natural philosophy" it has been refined and subdivided over the years (natural philosophy into physics, chemistry, biology, etc.; Gothic into suspense, thrillers, horror, ghost stories, etc.)

In both cases it's difficult to say what if anything is left as "pure" Gothic or "pure" natural philosophy (maybe it's easier in the latter case, if a case could be made for the kind of theoretical physics where it is impossible to test the theories by experimentation because the resources needed are so huge - although I suppose it could be counter-argued that this is a practical rather than philosophical distinction).

For cinema, it must be even more difficult what constitutes an example of "pure" Gothic because literary Gothic had begun subdividing into the various genres before the new medium of film was out of its infancy.

I don't think the presence of the supernatural necessarily lessens a work's claim to be Gothic: surely the 1981 adaptation of Peter Straub's Ghost Story is "more Gothic" than, say, Get Carter (both involve revenge and family secrets).

The reason I've posted about ghosts recently is that these are the DVD releases that I was excited about, or that caught my eye and that I thought others would be interested in hearing about.

I'd be interested in hearing about what other members of this Group would consider to be a Gothic film.

After all that, I'm no longer sure what a "Gothic Christmas" would be ; ) - so I'll settle for wishing you all a happy, peaceful and prosperous one.

61.Monkey.
des. 26, 2012, 5:04am

>60 housefulofpaper: There are sub-genres of Gothic, yes, but they all still must have the specific elements that define "Gothic." Just because something has a ghost in it, that does not define it as Gothic. Yes, plenty of Gothic works (since the beginning) have had some supernatural elements, but again, that is not what defines it as Gothic. Wiki provides a list of elements that make up Gothic works on the Gothic fiction page, if you're curious. Also this site on Gothic novels (which was one of the sources on Wiki) has some good information as well.

62housefulofpaper
des. 27, 2012, 1:59pm

> 61

Thanks for those links. I think you'd agree that the Wiki list of elements needs to be treated with some care. There are unquestionably Gothic works that don't include all of those elements, and no doubt works that few (or none) would define as Gothic, that do include one or more of them. The main article talks about the English Gothic works of the 18th Century, parallel works in other languages, and subsequent works that developed from or borrowed from the Gothic. The Gothic novels site uses a much more restricted definition.

My feeling is that any attempts to define the Gothic, and say what works are or are not Gothic based on that definition, can only be a quasi-legal exercise and not definitive.

Some of the works we've looked at here, including Arabian Tales and Pulp Science Fiction, are arguably the more interesting for being on the borderline of Gothic. Considering them perhaps helps to sharpen a personal sense of 'the Gothic' - but only, I think, a personal one and not definitive.

63housefulofpaper
gen. 19, 2013, 7:23pm

No ghosts in this one ; )

The Seventh Victim (1943)

I think this might be my favourite of the horror films that Val Lewton produced in the '40s. It's at least as much film noir as gothic horror. The set up is that a teenage boarder at a fee-paying school (Mary, played by Kim Hunter) has no other family than her wealthy older sister. Mary discovers in the space of a few minutes that her sister has been missing for months, and that the school fees have not been paid. This propels Mary into the dangerous outside world in an attempt to find her sister.

It's still an enclosed world, though, as one character explains to Mary: "Manhattan is only nine miles long and two-and-a-half miles wide. I ain't never been off it. I know it like you know your own back yard". And visually it's all a succession of rooms connected by dark corridors, dark streets, the subway.

The story weaves its various strands of Chandlerish detection, popular Freudianism, genuine old-style gothic horrors, familiar Lewton tropes (including nerve-racking "night walk"), Hollywood romance (although - I suppose due to the War as much as the film's budget - the male lead actors aren't, let's be blunt, as handsome as one would expect from Hollywood's golden age) and, famously and surprisingly (in the days of the Hayes Code), a secret society of devil-worshippers as the villains, and most surprising of all, a persistent thread of morbid lust for death. This runs from the opening shot - a quotation from Donne in a stained glass window to the last shot of the film - which I won't spoil for anyone who hasn't seen it.

Scandalously, Lewton's films are still not all available in the UK, but this one be had on DVD (budget price, no extras, sadly).



64HarryMacDonald
gen. 19, 2013, 7:47pm

How could we have forgotten Luis Bunuel's incomparable VIRIDIANA, with the yummylicious Novice? Lola, you suprise me! -- G

65veilofisis
maig 14, 2013, 8:44pm

Anybody ever seen Polanski's THE TENANT? With its themes of duality, relative identity, and madness (not to mention some wonderfully lurid, spooky little scenes), I think it qualifies as 'Gothic,' in a sense. I've yet to meet anybody who has ever seen this, which is a pity, because it's one of my absolute favorite films...

66HarryMacDonald
maig 15, 2013, 8:41am

I know I am pushing definitions here, but if any of you have the chance to catch Bette Davis in DEAD RINGER, you might be surprised. Or as the The Two Thousand Year-Old Man would have said, "t'rilled and delighted". Happy shudders, -- Goddard

67veilofisis
maig 15, 2013, 11:06am

66

I own--and ADORE--Dead Ringer! I'm a great fan of all those 'psycho-biddy' films. And I don't find you to be pushing definitions: What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? and Hush...Hush, Sweet Charlotte are probably as archetypal as Gothic film can get... :)

68alaudacorax
maig 15, 2013, 6:13pm

#65 - Not only am I another who's never seen 'The Tenant', I'd never even heard of it. Which suprises me a bit as it has pretty high ratings online.

69housefulofpaper
maig 15, 2013, 6:23pm

I've got Viridiana and The Tenant to watch on DVD (the UK's only remaining high street retailer has been on the brink of collapse since the start of the year. New stock dried up, and for a brief period they found interesting stuff from - somewhere - to fill the gaps on their shelves. That's how I got these films). And I recorded Hush...Hush, Sweet Charlotte from TCM around Christmas time. (That's the UK version of TCM.)

On the question of "Gothic - yes or no?", what about "Old Dark House" films (or movies, if you prefer)? I would guess that James Whale's The Old Dark House (1932) would be on most people's lists, but how many others? What prompted the question is, in part, the recent UK DVD release of The House in Nightmare Park, a film from 1972 starring (of all people to make an appearance in this forum) the comedian Frankie Howerd. (The US title was Night of the Laughing Dead and it was recut; at the very least, the pre-credits sequence was discarded and a new title sequence filmed).

70housefulofpaper
Editat: juny 28, 2013, 5:12pm

Last Halloween, the discussion turned to the BBC's 1979 adaptation of 'Schalken the Painter', and its unavailability on DVD or - dare it be hoped - Blu-ray.

Well, the British Film Institute (the BFI) has launched a thing ... not just a 4-month season at the South Bank, but open air screenings around the country, books, DVD and Blu-ray releases. And the subject is Gothic: the dark heart of film.

On the BFI website, a DVD (and, I think, Blu-ray) release of 'Schalken the Painter' is promised.

I hope their website can be viewed outside the UK. Here is the link:

http://www.bfi.org.uk/news-opinion/news-bfi/announcement

Or not. Let's try this page:

http://www.bfi.org.uk/gothic

I don't know why that didn't work...I think you get most of the way there with that first link, now.

Does it all work now? Weird...

71alaudacorax
juny 29, 2013, 5:49am

Thanks for the heads-up on that, houseful. There's a lot of very interesting stuff in there.

Am I'm definitely looking forward to that book, Gothic: The Dark Heart of Film .

72pgmcc
juny 29, 2013, 7:08am

#70 houseful, the first link gave me an error message stating the site could not be found. The second link was perfect and I was able to view it from Dublin without any difficulty.

The one problem I do have is that I will not be near any of the venues when the films are showing.

BTW I watched Polanski's "The Tenant" last night. Very well done, both eerie and, in parts, hilarious.

Today I am introducing my older son and his girlfriend to the original Nosferatu. After that we will watch...Shadow of the Vampire.

My wife is away so I have some control over the day's activities. ;-)

Thank you for posting the BFI Gothic link. The trailer was great with memories of old movies watched with my family in the 1960s coming to the surface.

73alaudacorax
juny 29, 2013, 8:36am

#72 - Oh yes! I meant to mention that trailer in #71 and forgot. Good fun and nostalgic.

74housefulofpaper
juny 29, 2013, 4:01pm

> 71-73

Thanks. to be honest, the screenings aren't necessarily the most enticing thing for me either (certainly not the open-air ones - have you looked at the do's and don'ts for the British Museum screenings, for instance?). In any case, I'm not a BFI member.

That lovely trailer (which is also on YouTube, by the way) reminded me of quite a few films that deserve to be seen again (or in some cases, to be seen for the first time, like Night and the Hunter, which I recently got on DVD, or Eyes Without a Face, which I must have recorded onto VHS video from a TV screening nearly two decades ago.

75dhtabor
jul. 1, 2013, 2:31pm

Has anyone seen Dark Shadows? The trailer gave a silly impression, but I'm thinking of giving it a shot anyway.

76housefulofpaper
jul. 1, 2013, 4:25pm

> 75

I watched Dark Shadows on DVD and enjoyed it more than I'd expected, but that may have been because my expectations had been lowered by the poor reviews it gone on its theatrical release. It does admittedly revisit a lot of themes in Burton's earlier work. Like Edward Scissorhands or Beetlejuice, this one sets a full-on Gothic aesthetic (over-designed, some argue, or a sort of theme park version of Gothic) against a garish, nylon-and-polyester mid-20th century (specifically 1972) America. And it's played for more for laughs than for pathos. In that sense, it's closer to Mars Attacks! than Edward Scissorhands (but not as broad).

One thing that disappointed me was the climax to the film. In essence, it's a big CGI-heavy super-hero fight, which doesn't really fit tonally with what went before and also brought up memories of the 1999 remake of The Haunting.

I imagine if I had fond memories of the original TV series I wouldn't be very happy with Burton's treatment of it.

However, there is a lot going for this film. The cast is excellent. Johnny Depp in particular, I thought, did a great job, all fish-out-of-water, olde-worlde courtliness played throughout with stiff, Max Schreck body language. There are some good funny bits and genuinely creepy images. And there's a Christopher Lee cameo.

77housefulofpaper
jul. 16, 2013, 6:30pm

Some news - announced last month actually, but I missed it ... Mark Gatiss (The League of Gentlemen; Doctor Who; Sherlock) is writing and directing an adaptation of M. R. James' "The Tractate Middoth" for BBC2, to be broadcast this Christmas.

He's making a documentary about M. R. James too, also to be shown this Christmas (he's been tweeting from various James-related locations in the last few days, during filming).

78alaudacorax
jul. 17, 2013, 3:19am

Just had a weird touch of dyslexia, or something - read the first words as 'Sad news -'. I thought, "Wow! Houseful really doesn't like Mark Gatiss ..."

I think I remember seeing an interesting documentary by him on horror films, so I must watch out for the M. R. James doc.

I've never read The 'Tractate Middoth'! The exclamation mark is quite inadequate, there, to express the notes of aggrievement and surprise in which I'd liked to have written. I've just discovered I've been tripped-up yet again by my creation of a 'Long term reading' collection. I've been putting things - especially anthologies and 'collecteds' - in there and then completely forgetting about them - I have a hard enough time keeping track of my 'Currently reading'! I've just checked and I've still got James, Hawthorne, Bierce, Poe and Lovecraft in there - only the gods know how many unread stories - not to mention some more 'collecteds' (I'm trying not to cause confusion between 'collections', as on LibraryThing, and 'collections', as in 'Collected Works of ...') that I've forgotten to put anywhere. And that's not to mention the physical act of finding the things in the chaos around here - just been hunting and the M. R. James has gone AWOL. Must buy more bookcases.

After your previous post I'd meant to put Dark Shadows on my 'to see' list over on Amazon (just done it) - I've quite liked what Tim Burton stuff I've seen in the past. Having said that, I've just been looking on IMDb and I'm surprised to find that he wasn't the director of A Nightmare Before Christmas - always the first thing to my mind when someone mentions Tim Burton. Perhaps something about the boundaries between producer and director blurring?

Incidentally, on IMDb, to me the cast and crew of Dark Shadows look a lot creepier in the pics of the premier than they do in the movie stills. Especially Michelle Pfeiffer - there's something quite doll-like or 'Stepford' about her.

Now I feel guilty about writing that - is Michelle Pfeiffer an LT member, I wonder, and reading the Gothic Lit forum? Apologies ma'am (just in case).

(sighs) It's not easy being me.

79housefulofpaper
jul. 17, 2013, 5:27pm

>78 alaudacorax:

Hello - good to hear from you again! I ought to put on record that I have high regard for Mr Gatiss (indeed, for all members of the League...).

I think the thing about A Nightmare Before Christmas is that it's very much Tim Burton's vision, but he needed Henry Selick's skill as a stop-motion director to bring it to life. Burton's early career was in drawn 2-D animation.

I can definitely empathise with you over the unread books and inaccessible stuff, especially as I'm currently redecorating (slowly) and have one empty room and the others looking ripe for a reality TV show about hoarders.

80alaudacorax
Editat: jul. 18, 2013, 6:08am

#79 - Hello - good to hear from you again!

Yes, it is getting quiet around here, lately. Perhaps The Gothic is more a pursuit for the winter and the darker evenings?

The nearest I am at the moment is the 'Globe Theatre On Screen' DVD of Marlowe's Doctor Faustus. I'm not sure if it counts as Gothic but it's 'in the same ball-park'. Haven't watched it yet - I'm saving it for the weekend.

Oddly enough, I've seen it on stage and, of course, I have the text (and a DVD of Gounod's opera), but I don't remember that I've ever seen a screen version, even on telly.

And having said written that, I looked on IMDb and there are a couple more, including a Richard Burton - Liz Taylor version. Don't remember even reading about it. I'm embarrassed by that; Burton's home village was in walking distance of mine - 'local boy made good' and all that - and I really should have known about it. I shall no doubt buy it at some point.

81housefulofpaper
jul. 18, 2013, 6:18pm

> 80

I seem to remember the Burton-Taylor version doesn't have much of a critical reputation. The part of Helen of Troy was increased (from a walk-on!) for Taylor. I wonder if it would have worked if she'd played Mephistopheles? I did see a little of the film on TV a few years ago. The look of it was a lot like the original "Star Trek" when it did Gothic - a lot of lurid red and purple lighting. Maybe this was just at the end though. It may have been a scene set in Hell.

I also saw excerpts played in - I think - an open-air theatre (not the Globe, as far as I can recall; it was filmed too long ago) and recorded for the Open University. This was back when OU programmes were shown on TV. It wasn't all calculus!

Good grief, I haven't read the play for 20 years. I do recall feeling that it consisted of a wonderful beginning - the initial scenes between Faustus and Mephistopheles; a wonderful ending - Faustus's long monologue during his last night; but the middle is just trivial knockabout stuff. Of course I can see the reason behind it, it shows Faustus squandering both his God-given and his infernal gifts, but even so it seems to weaken the play as a work of art (or maybe I was a bit precious 20 years ago and wanted my art to be high-flown and poetical; or again maybe I couldn't appreciate that what lies dead on the page comes alive on the stage. I've never seen a live performance, so I can't make a judgement there).

Funnily enough, I was talking about Richard Burton in The Medusa Touch at work today. Although, I doubt it's a film he'd like to be remembered by, particularly.



82alaudacorax
set. 1, 2013, 4:02pm

UK Amazon is advertising a Bfi, two-disc set of the 1977, BBC series 'Supernatural', to be released on November 18th (in the UK, at least - couldn't find it on US Amazon, sorry).

This sounds as if it would have been right up my street (there's an excellent, detailed and lengthy review if you scroll down a bit from the other end of the link), yet I have no memories of it at all - either of seeing it or hearing about it. It was obviously on when I had more interesting things to do than watch telly - wish I could remember what they were! Anyway, it's tempting enough that I did the pre-order thing.

83housefulofpaper
set. 1, 2013, 5:21pm

> 82

I would have been 10 years old when this was transmitted, but I had no memory of it either (mind you I wasn't a "horror kid" then, I was into Science Fiction and Super Hero comics at the time, plus a new BBC drama series could come and go without a lot of hoopla in those days).

However I've since found out a bit about the series. It gets a favourable mention (and a b/w still) in Jonathan Rigby's English Gothic: a century of horror cinema. A couple of years after reading that book, a copy of the novelisation of Supernatural turned up in my local Oxfam bookshop.

As Rigby puts it, the stories/individual episodes offer "clever speculations on the origins of the main Gothic stereotypes." Rather like the US miniseries of a few years earlier, Frankenstein: the true story, the 1977 Supernatural present a spin on the old stories as, well, as the true stories.

84alaudacorax
set. 2, 2013, 5:23am

#83 - 'As Rigby puts it, the stories/individual episodes offer "clever speculations on the origins of the main Gothic stereotypes." Rather like the US miniseries of a few years earlier, Frankenstein: the true story, the 1977 Supernatural present a spin on the old stories as, well, as the true stories.'

Ah. I'd been wondering what, exactly, the reviewer I mentioned - 'peter41' - meant by 'original back stories and human interest elements'. That gets me even more eager to see them.

I found some info on the career of the series' screenwriter, Robert Muller - http://www.screenonline.org.uk/people/id/902572/.

Given what I'd read about the series, I suspected he might have been a fiction writer as well. I found Supernatural: Haunting Stories of Gothic Terror was published in the same year as the series was released, but most of the editions on LT have him as editor rather than author. On the obvious questions - Did he author the book? Which came first, book or series? - I can't find answers.

Actually, though the author list needs cleaning up - there seem to be a number of writers of the same name lumped together - he was definitely a novelist - http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0014_0_14363.html - so it's a pretty fair assumption that he wrote the short stories, too.

And I only came online to check the local weather forecast and now it's ten-past-ten and I haven't even had my breakfast yet. Got carried away again, didn't I?

85housefulofpaper
set. 2, 2013, 2:31pm

> 84

The cover of the Fontana paperback just has Robert Muller's name without any modifiers or additions, but the title page says "Devised and Edited by Robert Muller".

Here's what the contents page says:

"Dorabella or In Love with Death" by Robert Muller Adapted by Rosemary Timperley
"Lady Sybil or The Phantom of Black Gables" by Robert Muller Adapted by Mary Danby
"Heirs or The Workshop of Filthy Creation" by Robert Muller Adapted by Brian Leonard Hayles
"Countess Ilona or The Werewolf Reunion" by Robert Muller Adapted by Roger Malisson
"Viktoria or The Hungarian Doll" by Sue Lake Adapted by the author
"Mr Nightingale or Burning Masts" by Robert Muller Adapted by the author
"Gall or Ghost of Venice" by Robert Muller Adapted by Rosemary Timperley

I think it's clear that Supernatural was at least as much Robert Muller's baby as (say) The X-Files was Chris Carter's. He wrote all but one of the original "teleplays". The TV series came before the book. He only wrote one of the adaptations.

As an aside (or two), I assume Mary Danby is the anthologist who co-edited the "Fontana Book of Great Horror Stories" series, while Brian Leonard Hayles must be the screenwriter who created the Ice Warriors for "Doctor Who".

86alaudacorax
Editat: set. 4, 2013, 6:32am

#85 - Thanks for that, houseful.

Actually, I couldn't resist ordering a copy on Amazon - like I need any more unread books around here! It was just 1p plus postage, so ...

Speaking of Amazon: because I've pre-ordered the DVD set, a DVD of John Wayne's 'Red River' has appeared on my 'Recommended for you' list. I'm not even going to try to work that one out.

87housefulofpaper
set. 5, 2013, 7:32pm

> 86

I'm never sure whether to be relieved or alarmed when those algorithms get it wrong. It's not that I think the computers know something about me that I don't, it's the worry that anybody who sees the results will assume that they do.

88pgmcc
set. 6, 2013, 4:15am

#87

It's not that I think the computers know something about me that I don't, it's the worry that anybody who sees the results will assume that they do.

Rest assured, it's the same technology supermarket chains use with their loyalty cards data. Oh!, and Yes, it's the same technology the US security agencies use to interpret people's library loans and purchases to identify potential security risks and to direct surveillance.

I was up to my uxters in these systems (from a supermarket loyalty card viewpoint, honest) when I read Philip K Dick's Minority Report. Having finished the book I thought, "Why would one need pre-cogs, the sales data tells all."

It is quite scary how much one can deduce from these massive amounts of data and how behaviour can be influenced on-foot of that knowledge.

Of course, your comment, "the worry that anybody who sees the results will assume that they do." is the key that opens the door of error.

89drneutron
set. 6, 2013, 8:20am

And just in time is CNN's report on "Big Data" and what it knows about us. And how often they get it wrong...

http://money.cnn.com/2013/09/05/pf/acxiom-consumer-data/index.html?hpt=hp_t5

90housefulofpaper
oct. 5, 2013, 5:34pm


http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03b2pwt

That, I hope, is a link the 19 September edition of Night Waves on BBC Radio 3. It was a broadcast from the British Film Institute (BFI) and is a panel discussion about The Innocents, Jack Clayton's 1961 adaptation of Henry James' "The Turn of the Screw".

I imagine it was a pre-screening talk, although the events timetable for September is no longer on the BFI website, so I can't check.

91alaudacorax
Editat: oct. 6, 2013, 6:26am

I listened to that when broadcast, but had forgotten about it till I read #90. I found it quite interesting (though I've never read the film or seen the book).

As I remember, there was rather more focus on the actual film and its making than the 'Sound of Cinema' series title would suggest - which much added to the interest.

I was intrigued to hear Peter Wyngarde on the programme - I hadn't heard or seen anything of him in years. An actor misfortunate (or not - don't know) to be indelibly associated in the minds of Brits over a certain age with 'Mexican' moustaches, curly perms, medallions, flared trousers ...

ETA - from the bottom of the webpage:
The Innocents is re-released by the BFI as part of GOTHIC: The Dark Heart of Film in selected UK cinemas on Friday 13 December 2013, certificate 12A.

Also, looking at the pictures, Wyngarde's still got that 'tache (though, like so many of us, no longer the luxuriant locks).

92alaudacorax
Editat: maig 23, 2014, 2:53pm

Casting around for a way to mark Hallowe'en this evening, I decided to watch my DVD of 'The Haunting' (original version) - haven't watched it for several years.

It's STILL one of the best and scariest horror films I've ever seen. One of the best Gothic mansions, to too.

93housefulofpaper
oct. 31, 2013, 5:58pm

Yes! It lives up to the description in the book (I'm quoting from memory): "The house was vile."

Now it's Ettington Park Hotel (the interiors were studio sets, of course).

Looking on the Web, I see that, despite the luxury makeover, the building still boasts (I suppose that's the right word) a reputation as one of the most haunted places in Britain.

94alaudacorax
nov. 1, 2013, 6:11am

#93 - It's actually rather warmly beautiful - all that honey-coloured Cotswold stone. It's much creepier-looking in black and white. Have a look here at a pair of photos from roughly the same viewpoint.

95housefulofpaper
nov. 1, 2013, 2:57pm

It does look much friendlier in daylight. Actually - the image looks a bit squashed and distorted in the top picture. If that's how it looked in the film, maybe Robert Wise or his Director of Photography used a special lens to make the building appear creepier.

96alaudacorax
nov. 1, 2013, 5:28pm

The black and white is taken from a somewhat lower viewpoint - there seems to be a definite slope to the forecground - I'm not sure if this makes it 'loom' a bit more?

97alaudacorax
nov. 18, 2013, 7:26am

#81 - I seem to remember the Burton-Taylor version doesn't have much of a critical reputation ... I wonder if it would have worked if she'd played Mephistopheles?

Over the weekend I watched Helen Mirren playing 'Prospera' in The Tempest and it reminded me of your suggestion. I think Taylor and Burton missed a trick, there.

I think we've touched often in these threads on Shakespeare as forerunner of the Gothic - plenty of the elements are there in The Tempest (I'm talking about the play in general, here).

Haven't really made up my mind about this DVD at the moment, though - need to watch it again.

98alaudacorax
Editat: nov. 18, 2013, 7:34am

I actually treated myself to a bunch of DVDs, including 'Viridiana' (#64, #69). Haven't watched that yet, though. One I did watch was Valerie and Her Week of Wonders.

Does it qualify for mention in a Gothic film thread? I think so ...

What's it about? Err ... ummm ... well ... the thing is ... there's this young girl and ... ummm ... there are possibly vampires - or possibly not ... and there's a polecat-ferret masquerading as a weasel which may or may not be - well, I'm not sure really ... and there are dubious priests or monks or there may not be ... I spotted a theorbo towards the end - I'm always happy to see a theorbo - but that's off-topic ... and there's a cobwebby inside of a clocktower - I think (it may be down a dark stairway) ... chickens have a hard time of it ... there are sinister family secrets - or, there may be, anyway ... there are definitely more cultural references than you can shake a stick at ...

Okay, I don't know what it's about, but it was quite fascinating - going to have to watch it a few more times (having said that, I find 'Celine and Julie Go Boating' fascinating, but I've been re-watching that for years and still haven't figured it out, so don't hold your breath on this one - that's not a random tangent, by the way, there are some parallels). A lot of it is quite beautiful to watch, to.

If you started off with a traditional Gothic tale and then accidentally lived through the sixties and went to a lot of happenings and stuff and thoroughly earned yourself the traditional scrambled-memory and so on, and only then got round to making a film of your tale, you might end up with something like 'Valerie and Her Week of Wonders'. Possibly.

99alaudacorax
Editat: nov. 18, 2013, 1:11pm

#98 - When I wrote that last paragraph I'd temporarily forgotten the film was made in 1970 - so it's right of that time, really. Not noticeably dated, though, which is probably why I forgot.

100housefulofpaper
nov. 18, 2013, 1:43pm

> 98

The Hauntological crowd are very fond of this film (the term originates with Jacques Derrida and puns on "ontological", I understand. The current meaning seems to have settled on a nostalgia among British 40-somethings for '70s "folk horror" and Radiophonic music: the sights and sounds of '70's television - with forays further afield, such as here, into Czech surrealism).

The source is a novel by Víezslav Nezval. It's a surrealist novel that uses the props and tropes of Gothic in a similar way to Max Ernst's use of 19th century commercial and magazine engravings in his "surrealistic novel in college" Une Semainé de Bonté. The cover of the Twisted Spoon edition makes this point with an Ernst-style collage.

101alaudacorax
nov. 18, 2013, 2:37pm

#100 - I've occasionally come across those strange collages down the years and often wondered where they came from - now I know! Yet another one to go in the wish list ...

Incidentally, there's a regularly recurring march tune in 'Valerie and Her Week of Wonders' that I defy any viewer to get out of their head in less than twenty-four hours - just can't stop myself humming and whistling it.

102alaudacorax
Editat: nov. 23, 2013, 5:55am

#82 to #86 - The 'Supernatural' box-set turned up a couple of mornings ago and I watched the first two or three (the second and third episodes are one story) last night.

I wasn't overly impressed with the first one, 'Ghost of Venice'. I wasn't bored, but, somehow or other, the story didn't seem to flow very well. Also, I wasn't sure Robert Hardy, who was the main actor, fitted very well in the piece. It's possible the main character, Galt, an actor, was intended to be a bit hammy, but I thought Hardy was a bit unintentionally hammy.

The next story, spread over the episodes 'Countess Ilona' and 'The Werewolf Reunion', I thought rather good; not great telly, perhaps, but pretty good stuff. In this case, Ian Hendry was rather better at hamming it up - very much an ensemble piece, though, nobody was really the main character. One or two quirks, though - if anyone's seen it and could explain to me what the hell the countess kept doing with her manservant's gloved hand ...

I'd actually forgotten about all about it when I ordered the bunch of DVDs in #98, so I have quite a stack of watching to choose from. It's good the dark, cold evenings are here.

103housefulofpaper
nov. 22, 2013, 3:14pm

> 102

I need to order a copy. This month's other BFI Gothic releases - The Thorold Dickinson version of Gaslight, and (hooray!) Schalcken the Painter, were in HMV yesterday. They're not there any more...

104alaudacorax
nov. 23, 2013, 5:58am

Sold out that quickly? That's interesting.

My local HMV is long gone - victim of the recession - makes me feel a bit guilty about buying so much online.

105alaudacorax
Editat: nov. 23, 2013, 6:43am

I think I can recommend 'Supernatural'. I watched three more stories last night and I can at least say that it's quite entertaining - and I don't get any sense of formula or 'sameyness' about the stories - they're quite varied. And there are good actors* giving good performances. You notice that it's quite studio-bound, but I'm not sure that's actually a minus - for me, at least, it gave a quite nostalgic, 'period' feel which I liked - or even a touch of the stage.

I was a little surprised to see John Osborne in 'Lady Sybil' - I'd forgotten he was also an actor.

ETA - *I meant, of both sexes - I was long paused over that by the treachery of language in a politically-correct age, then I was guilty of imprecision!

106alaudacorax
des. 2, 2013, 6:53am

I've run into another of those dead ends I occasionally seem to hit when I think I've found an interesting writer.

It's been a while since I finished watching and reading the 'Supernatural' stuff and I've realised that the stand-out one for me now, both the TV prog and the more subtle, short story version, is 'Viktoria'.

I hadn't really taken on board at the time that this is different from the other stories by being both screen-written and adapted to short story by someone other than Robert Muller - Sue Lake (though I should have, because it says so in black and white up in houseful's post at #85).

I don't want to say she was a 'better' writer than Muller and the others - I'd have to watch and read the whole lot again to make up my mind on that - but she seemed at least to have been a more ambitious writer, in that she was seeking to engage with, or at least reacting to, topical concerns. There's a sub-text of male and female homosexuality.

To be honest, her treatment might be a bit problematic; I don't want to go into that, though - not least because, at this distance in time, I have no clear memory of the 'state of play' of our culture's attitude to such things in 1977, and I have way too much reading going on at the moment to take time out to research it.

My point is that I imagined she was 'pushing the envelope' of her brief on this series and, so, she caught my attention enough for me to want to find out more about her.

I can't. Apart from a handful of screenwriting jobs between '75 and '81 she seems to have no online existence at all. And the one job, 'Triangle' where she might have had a fair amount of work - 'unknown episodes', so I don't know how much - I seem to remember as rather soapy.

It's annoying. I started off thinking I might have found a promising short story writer; now I'm wondering if she might not have been a hack and I'm wondering if the subtext might not have been part of her brief after all - some producer or executive's idea to 'spice up' the series a bit. It does seem a little odd to have a script by a different writer stuck in the middle of what was clearly Muller's pigeon.

I'm wondering if 'Sue Lake' might have been a nom-de-plume and she more active under another name. It seems difficult to believe in a writer simply not writing, but I suppose there could be all sorts of reasons for that to be so.

107housefulofpaper
des. 2, 2013, 2:23pm

> 106

Yes, it does look as though the majority of her work was in soaps (not just Triangle, but Angels and Crossroads too). If only she'd ever worked on Doctor Who, we would have had her entire professional career subjected to minute historical investigation!

108alaudacorax
Editat: des. 17, 2013, 3:42pm

Does anyone know anything about F. W. Murnau's 'Der Januskopf' (1920), based on Jekyll and Hyde?

What's puzzling me is that IMDb gives it a rating of '7.5/10 from 61 users', yet they (and Wikipedia) describe it as 'lost'.

Time-travelling IMDb users? Very old users with long memories?

109housefulofpaper
Editat: des. 17, 2013, 5:29pm

> 108

It's definitely a lost film. It gets some passing references in a couple of books I own, but the Wikipedia entry gives more information.

I assume those IMDb users are "setting the record straight" based on the film's critical reputation. No doubt Conrad Veidt's performance would have been something to see (is this the film where a still shows the veins in Veidt's temple standing out alarmingly? - edited to add: No, I'm wrong, that's The Hands of Orlac).

110alaudacorax
Editat: des. 18, 2013, 5:48am

#109 - Seems a bit - well, I don't want to say 'dishonest', but not quite right to be voting on it - can I say 'lacking in intellectual integrity'? I'm probably being overly pedantic.

I'd love to see it, though. Of course, And, because it's lost, there's now a 'grass is greener' thing going on that really adds to the appeal.

We can still hope, of course - after the discoveries of recent years I've now got an almost complete version of 'Metropolis', which, in the past, was something one could only daydream about, so who knows what might turn up? There may a copy or two lurking in some cobwebbed corner, waiting for someone to recognise what it is.

Didn't know about that silent version of 'The Hands of Orlac' (or, I don't remember that I knew, or something like that ...), so that's another one for the wish list - and I haven't even got round to seeing 'The Cabinet of Dr Caligari' yet, so that's yet another. I've long had the intention of properly exploring silent films, but the practice has been quite slow and patchy so far.

The trouble is that I've a really random way of buying DVDs. I shove anything interesting into what is now quite a hefty wish list, then, every so often, I'll have a look through for anything priced at just a couple of quid or thereabouts, buying two or three if I find some. That doesn't lend itself to focussed programmes of exploration. I should rethink it ...

Edited because I've just decided I need to severely ration my use of 'of course'.

111alaudacorax
des. 18, 2013, 6:11am

#110 - Actually (I really need to severely ration my use of 'actually', too), 'Caligari' is one of those landmark films where you think to yourself, "How can I possibly have never seen that?" So I've just ordered it - Xmas present for ME - don't care if does cost the vast sum of £6-41!

112alaudacorax
des. 18, 2013, 6:20am

#110, #111 - Actually, I'm contemplating a New Year's Resolution to never again use 'of course' or 'actually' in my posts. Of course, whether I can stick to it is another matter ...

113housefulofpaper
des. 18, 2013, 1:29pm

It can be rather hit-and-miss buying silent films on DVD. I'll happily pay a bit more for "digitally restored" and/or an assurance that the film is in its most complete version.

114rainerc
des. 18, 2013, 4:04pm

>111 alaudacorax:: 'Caligari' has just been digitally restored and will premier at the 2014 Berlinale in February 2014. I guess that Criterion or Eureka will release it in the first half of 2014 on Blu-ray. Should be worth waiting for it.

115housefulofpaper
des. 18, 2013, 4:20pm

> 114

Great news!

116alaudacorax
Editat: des. 18, 2013, 11:57pm

#114, #115 - It's an Eureka DVD that I've ordered - and at least one Amazon reviewer speaks highly of the quality so ... fingers crossed.

Quite on a tangent to this thread, has anyone else noticed a sneaky little quirk of Amazon's dispatching procedure? If you order from one of Amazon's independent suppliers on standard delivery, the chances are they'll dispatch it the same day, or the next if you're a bit late in ordering, and it arrives pretty much as fast as expensive express delivery; if you order 'Amazon fulfilled', they hold back dispatch for several days, presumably to ensure that it doesn't arrive as fast as express delivery; but the way they word your dispatch estimates makes it sound as if it's the independent sellers who will be the slower, rather than 'Amazon fulfilled'.

Ordering lots of Xmas presents lately, this has been really noticeable.

This should undoubtedly be in a different thread and group - apologies.

ETA - I should have mentioned I'm talking about UK Amazon.

117.Monkey.
des. 19, 2013, 3:50am

>116 alaudacorax: I never had that experience. That was one of the reasons I considered amazon prime such a waste, their stuff nearly always arrived in under a week anyhow, why waste the extra money?

118housefulofpaper
des. 19, 2013, 1:56pm

> As I'm old enough to remember "please allow 28 days for delivery", a couple of days here or there aren't going to bother me, so Amazon's knavish tricks are a waste of time.

119alaudacorax
des. 22, 2013, 4:06pm

#33 - Hah! I've just watched Ken Russell's 'The Lair of the White Worm' on YouTube. Got to love it - I'd forgotten how deliciously bonkers it was/is.

Having written that, words fail me - I think I'm still stunned.

120alaudacorax
des. 22, 2013, 4:57pm

#119 - It has to be said that there's very little of Bram Stoker left in it - good fun, though.

121housefulofpaper
des. 22, 2013, 7:01pm

> 120

I like this better now than I did when I first saw it. I think Ken Russell's directing style looked old-fashioned, even a bit inept, in the late eighties (that fish-bowl lens, for example).



122alaudacorax
des. 22, 2013, 7:42pm

#121 - Interesting you should say that - I was thinking that it looked rather earlier than its date (1988) - '70s, perhaps (though there's the odd scene that probably wouldn't have passed the BBFC that early).

Just attempted to watch 'The Vampire Lovers' (1970), based (rather loosely) on Le Fanu's Carmilla, but I've given up after the first half-hour.

I was wildly in love with Madeline Smith as a youngster (yes, I know - yet another one), but, even for the sake of watching her ...

The screenplay is too crudely adapted and perfunctory compared to Le Fanu's story.

123alaudacorax
des. 31, 2013, 4:54pm

I think I got the wrong idea on 'Viridiana' - should have checked into it more thoroughly before I bought it. Not my kind of film; I could barely keep my interest up till the end; I can't see that it meets any definition of 'Gothic'.

However, I was quite stopped in my tracks by the piece from the BMV 232, J S Bach, Mass in B minor, a piece of music with which I was unfamiliar. I really had to pause the DVD and come and hunt it up right then. A welcome new discovery, so the time wasn't fully wasted.

But I really wanted something creepy for New Year's Eve ...

124housefulofpaper
des. 31, 2013, 5:39pm

> 123

I picked up a cheap DVD of this film earlier in the year, when HMV's troubles led them to (temporarily) filling their shelves with interesting, or at least obsurer, stock, but i haven't seen it yet. I worry that Bunuel's references are so specifically Spanish and Catholic that I won't get the references, which is pretty much the same as not getting the joke.

Looking at the film's wikipedia entry, there do appear to be some Gothic tropes (in the loose sense of characters, figures, clichés), particularly those belonging to the "imperilled lone female" side of the genre.

125alaudacorax
gen. 7, 2014, 4:55pm

I've just been watching a 1910 version of 'Frankenstein' - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcLxsOJK9bs - great fun and I imagine that, back in the day, some of it must have been quite scary - I'm thinking particularly of the creation of the monster.

126housefulofpaper
gen. 7, 2014, 6:18pm

> 125

I'd believed it was a lost film - I think it was, for a long time - and I'd only seen one photo of Charles Ogle as the monster. Although this was presumably a posed studio portrait it's quite poor and gives no real idea of how the monster actually looks on screen.

And then footage of the creation scene turned up. I saw it on a TV programme at some time in the '80's or early '90's.

Finding the whole film on Youtube a couple of years ago was a real surprise. Looking on Wikipedia, it seems that a print of the film resurfaced a long time ago, but was in private hands and the whole thing only became available a few years ago.

The Jekyll and Hyde elements of the story have been foregrounded in other versions as well. There's a TV version from the late 60's/early '70's where Ian Holm plays both Victor Frankenstein and the Monster.

127alaudacorax
Editat: feb. 21, 2014, 10:46pm

I've just watched a film called Byzantium (2012).

It's yet another modern take on the vampire myth. Now, I know anyone reading this is going to roll their eyes a bit when I mention vampires as the (relatively) good guys (good gals in this case) - shades of Twilight and so forth - but I really did find it very good with a quite interesting storyline and characterisation. Looking back, after it had finished, I could see one or two places where they'd papered over holes, but when I was watching I was quite gripped. I'd recommend it.

There's also an element of feminist allegory.

Well, I don't think I can say any more in case I spoil things for anybody who wants to watch it.

Oh yes - I suppose I should warn about some quite explicit violence and bloodshed, rather frank allusions to sexual matters, some quite ripe language, and Gemma Arterton in stockings and suspenders ... but all done in the best possible taste ...

ETA - I've just noticed that LOVEFILM classifies it as 'Action/Adventure, Horror' - it would have been much more accurately descriptive for them to have classified it as 'Drama, Horror'.

128housefulofpaper
feb. 22, 2014, 6:41pm

> 127

I expect this one will turn up on Sky Movies before too long. I'll watch it then.

I think I surfeited on vampire films a couple of years ago, from Murnau's Nosferatu and Dreyer's Vampyr onwards. I hit my limit after Zoltan,Hound of Dracula and had to stop for a while. I haven't even seen Let the Right One In (or Let Me In) yet.

129alaudacorax
Editat: feb. 23, 2014, 6:57am

#127, #128 - Now I think some more on it, I'm not sure if vampire is the right word for this film. Or, at least, it's different enough that I'm not sure I was strictly accurate in calling it a 'take on the vampire myth'. It has its own background story.

I don't know how original that really is because I haven't seen most of the modern vampire stuff (I'm not I don't think I've seen anything later than Buffy), but it was very original to me.

130alaudacorax
feb. 26, 2014, 7:13am

I've been at it again. Last night, I watched the German film We Are the Night.

It's better than you'd think from the picture - not 'girl-on'girl' exploitative and as much a drama as a horror.

This will probably not give any real idea of the film, though it's strictly accurate, but it looks at the emotional costs of being a vampire. Nope - that really doesn't add much to the post ...

It gripped my attention all the way through, was moving in places, the end I thought a bit of a cop-out - daft, even.

I'm not up to arguing this very logically at the moment, but I don't think it fits quite as well into a Gothic thread as Byzantium.

Not great. Not bad either. Worth watching.

131alaudacorax
feb. 26, 2014, 7:31am

I also watched Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters (you have to imagine me typing that with a sort of embarrassed grin).

Pure big-spectacle, slash-bang modern entertainment, I'm afraid. But it was tongue-in-cheek with some funny lines - usually including language too effing ripe to quote here. And Gemma Arterton again, I think she has designs on being the new Kate Beckinsale.

I don't know what the Brothers Grimm would think about it (there's a film about the Brothers Grimm hunting monsters, too).

132alaudacorax
feb. 26, 2014, 7:46am

#128 - Wow - Let the Right One In has 8.0/10 on IMDb, from over a hundred and forty thousand users. That's pretty good - I've got to watch that sometime.

133Rembetis
març 1, 2014, 6:30pm

'Robin Redbreast' - 1970 tv gem released by BFI in their 'gothic' strand on dvd. It's described by the BFI as 'folk horror', pre-dating 'The Wicker Man'. Sophisticated urban outsider moves to rural village ruled by superstition and 'the old ways'.....It was the highlight of my viewing last Halloween/Samhain.

Do Corman's Poe films count?! I particularly like 'Pit and the Pendulum', 'Masque of the Red Death' and 'Tomb of Ligeia'.

Many Hammer, Universal and Amicus films have gothic veins. Too many excellent films to mention, but one of my very favourites is 'Brides of Dracula' - wonderful production design; Martita Hunt and Freda Jackson are excellent, and there is a real sense of death and decay throughout, not forgetting the inimitable Miles Malleson providing the comic relief.

More tv - Nigel Kneale's 'Beasts' is excellent, maybe more horror than gothic, apart perhaps from the claustrophobic 'Baby', and the creepy extra 'Murrain' about the persecution of an old lady (who may or may not be a witch) by her fellow villagers.

>65 veilofisis: - I saw 'the Tenant' once, about 35 or so years ago in a late night double bill (with De Palma's Sisters) in a London cinema. It was a very strange film! I think I was too young to fully understand or appreciate it.

134housefulofpaper
març 2, 2014, 4:34pm

> 133

It's difficult to say exactly what is and what isn't "Gothic" - I've been criticised for going on about ghost stories in previous posts...

If the essence of Gothic is buried or somehow irrational secrets or powers, that threaten the rational individual - remembering the argument that the Gothic arose as a reaction to the 18th Century enlightenment - then I'd say that the films and tv programmes you've listed are all squarely in the Gothic camp (with the observation that with Poe, the horrors are largely internalised in the main character's mind.

135Rembetis
març 2, 2014, 7:42pm

>134 housefulofpaper: Hello. I agree with you that many ghost stories have very strong gothic elements. I note many ghost stories feature in the discussions in this group (e.g. M R James) - and rightly so too. If we restricted the meaning of gothic to the fiction produced in the 1760s to 1790s, that would be very limiting and narrow.

Thank goodness the programmers at the NFT in London had a wide definition of gothic in their recent excellent gothic film season, that rightly included 'The Amazing Mr Blunden'! I had a fabulous afternoon reliving my youth (there was also an interesting q&a afterwards with Madeline Smith, Rosalyn Landor, and Garry Miller that should turn up on the BFI iplayer at some point).

136alaudacorax
març 3, 2014, 7:13am

#135 - Welcome to the group, Rembetis!

#133, #134, #135 -

What, exactly, is 'Gothic' has been a perennial round here and probably always will be. I enjoy it's reappearances - keeps me thinking. I'll note that the original Alien (the one with John Hurt's insides) seems widely regarded as a Gothic horror and, when you read Gothic literature lit-crit, it fits right in - plenty of the elements are there - so it can be a pretty broad church if we want it to be.

From what I can find out about it online, I have no memory of Beasts, but it sounds very tempting. I'm of an age that, rather than the conventional hiding behind the sofa when Daleks were on-screen, as a child I used to hide during Quatermass; so Nigel Kneale's involvement is a nostalgically quivery bonus, too. Thanks for that, Rembetis - it's gone on my Amazon wish list.

Quite coincidentally, I ordered The Tenant this weekend, so I'm looking forward to watching that. I also ordered Dark Shadows, mentioned in #75, #76, #78, above. Every so often, I go through my wish lists for a batch of stuff that's currently around the £3 or less mark and they showed up this time - also The City of Lost Children and Bergman's The Hour of the Wolf, but I don't know if I'll see those as Gothic when I watch.

137Rembetis
març 4, 2014, 11:10am

>136 alaudacorax: Thanks for the welcome!

I am too young to have seen the original Quatermass tv programmes when they were originally broadcast, though I have the BBC dvd of the 1958/59 'Quatermass and the Pit'. No wonder you hid behind the sofa as a child, it is scary even today.

The only programme I recall that terrified me as a child was an episode of the 1970 series 'Wicked Women' starring Anna Massey as Christiana Edmund - the Victorian chocolate cream poisoner (with Mona Washbourne playing her mother). I was only 7 at the time and had nightmares for weeks afterwards.

Do let us know what you make of 'The Tenant' when you get round to watching it.

138LolaWalser
març 4, 2014, 11:14am

'Quatermass and the Pit'

Fantastic serial. I saw it for the first time only recently, it holds up fabulously.

'Wicked Women'

This seems to jog a memory. Was there a story where a couple starved a woman in an attic? Horrifying stuff.

139pgmcc
març 4, 2014, 11:19am

Hi Rembetis. The Tenant is eerie. Well worth a watch. I enjoyed the film despite some incongruous casting which actually added a bit of humour to the film for me.

140Rembetis
març 4, 2014, 11:27am

>138 LolaWalser:, Yes, that's right, that episode was about Alice Rhodes, played by Joanna Durham, and also starred the wonderful Ralph Bates. A true story where a vulnerable lady suffering from a learning disability, was married by the Ralph Bates character for her money, taken to the country and kept away from her family; stuck in the attic, ignored, and left to slowly starve. A truly horrific story, which I think led to a change in the law (Married Woman's Property Act). This was another excellent episode, though even today it's difficult to watch. I saw it recently on you tube, don't know how on earth the person got hold of it, but it was taken down for copyright infringements. I think the whole series is available to view free at the BFI in their Mediatheque in London. Wish it would get a dvd release.

141Rembetis
març 4, 2014, 11:32am

>139 pgmcc: Hello! Would the odd casting be Shelley Winters?! I recall she was in 'The Tenant', other than that, the utterly bizarre ending has stuck in my head.

142pgmcc
març 4, 2014, 11:40am

#141 Yes. I found her playing the concierge to be excellent but very American and not like a Parisien concierge. This did not spoil the film as I thought her performance was excellent.

I also thought the policemen who arrived were stereotypical New York cops rather than the Parisien gendarmes they were supposed to be. Again, this did not detract from my enjoyment of the film but rather added another dimension to it.

143Rembetis
març 4, 2014, 12:05pm

>142 pgmcc: You're right about Shelley. Can't remember the policemen but it has been a long time since I saw it.

144alaudacorax
març 7, 2014, 5:45am

Nothing really to do with this thread, but I just want to vent.

The saddest people on the planet (using sad in the modern, pejorative sense) have to be the benighted souls who write the 'Goofs' sections on movies on the IMDb. I'd like to work up a short story where one of these uber-nitpickers meets a relevantly horrific fate.

145Rembetis
Editat: març 8, 2014, 8:40am

>145 Rembetis: I know what you mean, but each to their own! One very knowledgeable acquaintance of mine (now sadly suffering from dementia) used to love searching for goofs in biographies and writing to the biographer to point out the errors. I recall, about 17 years ago, he wrote to the late Sheridan Morley listing about 25 errors in his biography of Gene Kelly. He received in return a terse letter telling him to desist, and threatening some form of legal action if he ever wrote to Sheridan again. I found this quite funny at the time, but my friend didn't!

Edited - 'biographer' replaced 'author'

146LolaWalser
març 8, 2014, 6:30pm

Shelley Winters seems to have a way of turning up in some odd, arguably Gothicky horror (some might include her role, or rather destiny, in The night of the hunter), with some choice co-stars what's more. Debbie Reynolds, Agnes Moorehead, Dennis Weaver and Micheal MacLiammoir in What's the matter with Helen? and no lesser a light than Ralph Richardson (as a perpetually drunk butler, IIRC) in Whoever slew auntie Roo?

147alaudacorax
març 8, 2014, 11:30pm

#145 - Didn't know Sheridan Morley was dead! Or, more likely, I'd forgotten - seems to happen a lot these days. I never really got out of the habit of thinking of him as 'Robert Morley's son'. The last time I heard him on the radio - 'just the other day', I could have sworn - I remember thinking (rather sourly, I suppose) that it was the first time I'd ever heard him when he didn't once during the programme use the words 'my father'.

#146 - I've always - all my life - been aware of Shelley Winters and known her name, without ever having been particularly in love with her. She just had such a screen presence that one just had to notice her. I don't believe I've ever seen the last two films you mention - I'll watch out for them.

148Rembetis
març 9, 2014, 7:15am

>146 LolaWalser: >147 alaudacorax: 'What's the matter with Helen' and 'Whoever Slew Auntie Roo' (UK title 'who slew auntie roo') are both entertaining films - grand guignol, and certainly gothicky! Neither have been released on dvd in the UK, but they are on a MGM US Region 1 dvd as a double bill.

WARNING - SPOILERS -
Debbie Reynolds says that Shelley Winters drove everyone insane on the set of 'Helen'. Shelley's 'method acting' meant that she inhabited the role of a person having a nervous breakdown, and, according to Reynolds, 'became the person in the film'. Shelley seems to have been aware of this herself, or perhaps was being cheeky when, in interview with the New York Times she said "I have to stab Debbie Reynolds to death. Poor Debbie — they'd better not give me a real knife." Bizarre that the night before the scene was shot Debbie Reynolds said that she had a nightmare in which she was stabbed. On arriving on set, she checked the knife and found the rubber prop knife had been replaced with a real blade.

149housefulofpaper
març 9, 2014, 8:25am

> 146 - 148

I looked on Amazon UK late last night, following LolaWalser's post, and apparently Region 2 DVDs of the films can be ordered from a Spanish vendor. Original soundtrack, but with castilian subtitles.

Both films were directed by Curtis Harrington, a name I was vaguely familiar with but didn't know anything about. His obituary from Fortean Times reveals someone both interesting in himself and at the centre of a fascinating group of people.

http://www.forteantimes.com/strangedays/obituaries/645/curtis_harrington.html

150LolaWalser
març 9, 2014, 10:47am

Thanks for the link, houseful! Director and occultist! Kenneth Anger and Barbara Steele! :) I feel like such a slacker for not bothering to explore more myself--I'm afraid I just figured it would be the usual horror hack...

#148

Fascinating! Method acting to the max. The insurance on those productions must be insane...

#147

I hope you find them. Pity about restricted issues (how I hate the regionalisation of media...), I got that double MGM feature Rembetis mentions for a few dollars.

151Rembetis
març 9, 2014, 7:20pm

>149 housefulofpaper: Many thanks from me too for that most interesting link. Harrington's memorial service reads like a black comedy...

>150 LolaWalser: I'm with you on the regionalisation of media! I also have the MGM double feature of 'Roo' and 'Helen' and play it on a cheapish multi-region dvd player. Around a quarter of my dvd collection consists of US Region 1 dvds that simply don't see the light of day on UK dvd.

152alaudacorax
Editat: març 14, 2014, 9:51am

#53 to #62

I'm probably just being mischievous (killing time while my lunch is digesting), but I've been re-reading Kelly Hurley's 'British Gothic Fiction, 1885-1930' in The Cambridge Companion to Gothic Fiction and I can't resist quoting a couple of his/her sentences here -

Critics of the Gothic agree on little else besides the literary historical fact that a genre that would be known as "The Gothic" came to prominence in Great Britain between 1760 and 1820, a genre distinguished by its supernaturalist content, its fascination with social transgression, and its departure, in formal terms, from the emerging norm of realism.

... and ...

There is even less consensus on what constitutes literary Gothicism in later periods and on whether the post-Romantic Gothic can usefully be distinguished from adjacent genres such as science-fiction, romance, fantasy, and horror.

ETA - pp. 190, 191, respectively.

153alaudacorax
Editat: març 14, 2014, 10:48am

I've just been musing on my #136 mention of Alien as a 'Gothic' film.

I realised that if I accept that idea - having the wrecked alien spaceship and the Nostromo standing for decaying castles, having the company stand in for the degenerate, feudal aristocracy with murky intentions, Ripley as the (albeit rather formidable) damsel-in-distress, and so forth - I could say exactly the same thing about Resident Evil, which is pretty much built to the same blueprint. Yet I found myself oddly reluctant to do so. Resident Evil just doesn't strike me as Gothic.

When I thought carefully about what bothered me about a 'Gothic' Resident Evil, I realised my problem was that (to my memory, at least - this might not stand up to re-watching) the scenes are all well-lit with clean backgrounds, in contrast to the half-lit, water-dripping, 'greasy-scruffy-workplace' look of much of Alien (or the half-light and cobwebs of more traditional settings).

So, are the main defining elements of cinema Gothic simply low lighting and grime? Given the inclusion of menace, baddies and hidden agendas, of course, but they can be found in quite un-Gothic westerns, soaps, detective stories - whatever.

Shouldn't have mentioned detective stories - that got me thinking of film noir and I'm sure there's probably plenty of overlap between film noir and Gothic if I look for it.*

ETA - *As already hinted at in houseful's #63.

154pgmcc
març 14, 2014, 11:22am

>153 alaudacorax: So, are the main defining elements of cinema Gothic simply low lighting and grime?

You are adding an extra dimension to the concept of Blade Runner as Gothic.

155alaudacorax
abr. 18, 2014, 7:46am

http://www.themoviewaffler.com/2013/10/horror-movie-icons-share-their-favorite.h...

I found this interesting - intrigued by some choices, bemused by others - didn't know who most of these people were and never heard of half the films - but I've bookmarked it for further ferreting on some of the mentions.

156alaudacorax
Editat: maig 23, 2014, 4:15pm

I've just watched the 2012 film, Kiss of the Damned. I was quite absorbed and I enjoyed it - best film I've seen in a while ...

... which just goes to show that I've watched WAY too many crappy films since buying this 'proper grown-up telly' back at the beginning of the year. As soon as I let my brain off the leash, I realise that Kiss of the Damned really isn't that good. There are a lot of genre cliches - grand opera aria soundtracking a key moment, Chopin for a lower-key scene, lots of visual ones, as well. It's a bit soapy in places. Plot and dialogue are rather perfunctorily written.

I note that, like so many contemporary films, the same name is credited for writer and director. You can imagine a director saying, "We don't need to waste all that money on writers - any damn fool can write a script - I'll do it!" And television seems all written by commitees, which I'm pretty sure all include an accountant or two to check on the prospective profitability of every trope used. Oops - it's bringing out the grumpy old man in me. No wonder my brain is rotting ...

ETA - And while I'm in 'grumpy old man' mode, I might as well make the most of it - SOD the tuna steak and broccoli - I'm phoning for some Chinese food and putting a bottle of white in the fridge.

157Rembetis
juny 8, 2014, 4:10am

Hello everyone. A while ago we were chatting about Curtis Harrington. For anyone who is interested in his rarer experimental work and is in London on 22 July, the National Film Theatre on the South Bank is showing "Dark dreams and shadows: the early films of Curtis Harrington". The write up says:

"Seduced by the shadows and myths of early Hollywood cinema and captivated by the writings of Edgar Allan Poe, he explored his own subconscious across a series of intimate and deeply surreal short films in the 40s and 50s, before later directing exploitation films.

This selection of early works...includes a powerful study of the notorious Californian artist and occultist Marjorie Cameron: The Wormword Star, plus the nightmarish psychodramas Fragment of Seeking and The Assignation. As a special bonus, we also present Usher, a brooding tale about fear and guilt that Harrington shot on 35mm in 2002, after years working in television and exploitation cinema. We are pleased to be screening restored prints from the Academy Film Archive, USA."

158alaudacorax
juny 8, 2014, 11:00am

>157 Rembetis:

Interesting.

There's a two-disc box-set of his short films but, as far as I can find, only available as Region A/1 Blu-ray. I recently bought a blu-ray player but I'm still trying to work out how to hack it for multi-region (should've done that before I bought it, shouldn't I?)

159Rembetis
juny 8, 2014, 2:54pm

I am a bit of a technophobe but have a multi region blu ray player which came with a hack code, but, gosh it is hard to use and usually results in the player crashing and requiring lots of reboots. I just leave it on Region B now (never have any such problems with my multi region dvd player, Blu-ray players are a different beast altogether, what with their 'firmware' updates etc).

Checked youtube earlier and the Harrington short The Wormwood Star is posted there as are some of the others.

160LolaWalser
juny 8, 2014, 4:55pm

>157 Rembetis:

Wish I could be there!

>159 Rembetis:

I actually use two different laptops at home just because of the NTSC vs. PAL nonsense.

161housefulofpaper
juny 15, 2014, 1:38pm

There's a Curtis Harrington film available on DVD and Blu-ray in the UK. It's been digitally remastered (whatever improvements this process has made to the picture quality, it's also had the curious side-effect of making it look as if shot on videotape).

Anyway, this film is called 'Night Tide' and was shot around Santa Monica and Venice Beach in 1960. Dennis Hopper stars as a young, naive sailor.

Storywise, it owes a debt to Val Lewton's 'Cat People', replacing the strange foreign girl who might actually be a big cat, with a strange foreign girl who might actually be a siren of classical mythology, who has wound up playing a mermaid in a sideshow.

This seems like a transitional film, trying to be a mainstream low-budget thriller but not free of Harington's bohemian and experimental and occultist background - from the (seriously good) jazz in the opening nightclub scene (with Harrington's friends cast as the customers - the most convincing '50's/'60s hip crowd I've ever seen on film, I think), to the casting of occultist Marjorie Cameron in a creepy role, to the fact that much of the film plays as a french New Wave film, in bright sunlight and accompanied by a wistful instrumental soundtrack.

All this makes it an odd, off-kilter film. It might be too languidly paced for some, and the denouement might be a let down (and I have to confess that a vital piece of "business" was unclear to me until I listened to the commentary track between Harrington and Hopper). Despite this, it does seem strange the film isn’t better known. It’s at least as good a ‘cult’ film as, say, ‘Carnival of Souls’. Maybe it was unavailable for a long time?

162alaudacorax
juny 19, 2014, 9:32am

>92 alaudacorax:,>93 housefulofpaper:,>94 alaudacorax:,>95 housefulofpaper:,>96 alaudacorax:,

This from the 'Trivia' section on IMDb's entry for 'The Haunting':

The famous sharp contrast of the house against the dark sky and the clouds was created by the use of infrared film stock.

I wonder if this was a common technique? I find a slightly 'creepy' quality in infrared photographs of scenery and architecture - I'm now wondering whether this is the result of my unknowingly having seen examples of the above technique in horror films over the years.

163housefulofpaper
juny 19, 2014, 2:16pm

>162 alaudacorax:

I think read or heard somewhere that the very sharp and detailed image quality of some black and white films of the '60s was down to the use of near-infrared film. It's not particularly creepy, though - although it might be when applied to cloudy skies and gothic buildings.

164housefulofpaper
juny 21, 2014, 1:12pm

Has anybody been watching Penny Dreadful?

165Rembetis
juny 22, 2014, 1:42pm

>164 housefulofpaper: I was so looking forward to Penny Dreadful, but found I couldn't get into it at all. I gave up after two episodes. Are you enjoying it?

166housefulofpaper
juny 22, 2014, 3:25pm

>165 Rembetis:

I gave up after two episodes You could bail out after that ending? Gosh.

Yes, I am enjoying it, a lot, although admittedly the storytelling meanders a bit. I know there's been some comment online that it's derivative, not because it pulls together Dr Frankenstein, Dracula, et al, but because Kim Newman and Alan Moore/Kevin O'Neill have already done similar things with their Anno Dracula and League of Extraordinary Gentlemen series.

What gives this series a unique flavour is the focus on life: vampires and Dorian Gray extending it supernaturally, Dr Frankenstein creating it in his laboratory, the ancient Egyptian beliefs in an afterlife being a big driver of the plot, life after death (episode two's seance); and alongside life, of course death, by disease (TB, tropical diseases), by violence.

167Rembetis
juny 22, 2014, 8:32pm

>166 housefulofpaper: I can usually suspend disbelief quite easily but couldn't do so with this. I expected it to be derivative and to play fast and loose with famous gothic characters, but didn't expect it to be unconvincing, poorly scripted, badly acted and dull. Because I couldn't get into it, I started playing that awful game where one compares the acting with previous actors who have played the roles (e.g. Cushing Vs Treadaway as Frankenstein) which didn't help!

Must say, my mates agree with you that it's great. Also, I might have been in the wrong mood! It happens occasionally that something I dislike on first viewing, sometimes intensely, seems quite good on a second.

168alaudacorax
juny 28, 2014, 7:01am

>41 housefulofpaper:

Watched The Uninvited a couple of times last week - a delight - thoroughly enjoyed it. It seemed to combine elements of full-blooded horror like The Haunting (1963) with light comedy in the mode of the old, Rex Harrison, Margaret Rutherford Blithe Spirit, but I didn't think that was a detriment - I thought it worked very well on its own terms. I just didn't know quite where to put it (in genre terms).

169alaudacorax
Editat: juny 29, 2014, 7:18am

>168 alaudacorax:

Why the reference to The Haunting?

Just come back from a week walking in the Forest of Dean. For the evenings I took The Cambridge Companion to Gothic Fiction and had intended to take all the films treated in it in the 'Monstrous Sexuality' section in Misha Kavka's 'The Gothic on screen' chapter. In the event, I had The Uninvited, The Haunting, Cat People (1942) and Rebecca (1940), but, for some reason I can't fathom, I omitted to order The Secret Beyond the Door (1947), which was there, plain as day, on my list. Still, I had my own, private, Gothic film festival.

As always, I thought The Haunting one of the finest horror films ever made.

I don't know whether it was a result of reading the section on it, but I found Cat People much better than I'd remembered. I thought Simone Simon managed to project both 'kittenish' and sinister in a way that quite fascinated - it was definitely her film, I thought.

As for Rebecca, I'd forgotten how much Olivier irritates me (at least when you take him away from Shakespearian language and period costume). Failed to watch it all the way through, twice. I may give it another go tonight. Also, if Cat People was is a masterpiece of taut and lean, Rebecca, I think, is anything but.

170alaudacorax
juny 28, 2014, 7:39am

>41 housefulofpaper:, >168 alaudacorax:

Why 'The Uninvited'? Was it possibly a reference to Carmel, or was it simply dreamed up with little thought by some studio exec or publicist as just a good, general title for a ghost story?

171alaudacorax
Editat: juny 28, 2014, 7:49am

#164 to #167 -

Never heard of Penny Dreadful, but the reference to League of Extraordinary Gentlemen rings a bell - has it been discussed on one of the other threads, perhaps?

ETA - Oops! I was confused - thinking of 'The League of Gentlemen' - Mark Gatiss, etc.

172alaudacorax
juny 29, 2014, 7:09am

Just another comment on The Uninvited ...

>41 housefulofpaper: - ... "wrapped in so suffocating a mantle of faux-english gloss ...

I really couldn't see that - hence, probably, my reference to the British-made Blithe Spirit in >168 alaudacorax:.

The single instance when I was reminded it wasn't a British film was the weird accent of the shopkeeper who sold Rick the postcards and fags. And having written that, I looked him up on IMDb and find he was a Glaswegian. Um ... have to listen to him again.

Anyway, back to my initial point - I'm really surprised that the comment was written by an Englishman - I assumed at first that Jonathan Rigby might be an American critic and writing from a very different viewpoint or mindset than mine. I genuinely can't see (or hear) what he's talking about. If I didn't know different, I'm sure I'd happily slot it into a raft of old British black and whites.

173alaudacorax
juny 29, 2014, 7:29am

>169 alaudacorax: - I didn't give Rebecca another go last night, couldn't summon up the enthusiasm.

I did however watch the first half of The Ninth Gate (1999). I fell asleep, but that was possibly more to do with me than the film. However, from what I saw, it strikes me that this is the ultimate film for this group's members - great big hints of Gothic mystery and horror - and it's about books!

174pgmcc
juny 29, 2014, 12:26pm

>173 alaudacorax: The Ninth Gate is based on The Dumas Club which was the first Arturo Perez-Reverte book I read and which addicted me to his novels.

The book and the film are sufficiently different (especially the latter half of the film) to make both entities enjoyable in their own right without the painful task of comparison.

175housefulofpaper
juny 29, 2014, 1:16pm

>172 alaudacorax:

I think The Uninvited is noticeably different to contemporary British films. Not because the US film hits any off-notes in performance or production design, but because most UK films are slow and stilted in comparison. There are a number of reasons for this. The acting is overly theatrical, for one. Technically, many of them give the impression that sound film has only just been invented. And then they are so class-ridden, with any working class characters reduced to comic turns or criminal heavies (exhibit A, a film I rewatched today: The Door With Seven Locks, an Edgar Wallace adaptation from 1940. It's a creaky mystery notable only for Leslie Banks' silkily revisiting (and sending up?) his Count Zaroff as "Dr Manetta" - oh, and the splendidly named leading man, Romilly Lunge).



176alaudacorax
juny 29, 2014, 4:22pm

>174 pgmcc:

Oops! Another tempting book. I have to restrain myself at the moment. I visited the ruins of Tintern Abbey a few days ago and there's the most marvellous second-hand bookshop, hard-by, that kicked a big hole in my pocket - nothing Gothic, I'm afraid.

177alaudacorax
juny 29, 2014, 4:22pm

>175 housefulofpaper:

Wonderful name. That reminds me: I don't think, when I'd seen Cat People in the past, that I'd ever registered the hero's name - Oliver Reed. And he never got drunk and picked a fight once - so boring ...

178alaudacorax
Editat: set. 25, 2014, 5:50pm

Recently watched the DVD of the 1972 BBC TV series Dead of Night (here - with the wrong cover picture! - and here - sorry, doesn't seem to be available on US Amazon, unless it's under another name). Oddly, I thought I'd read of it in this thread - obviously not, so I can't remember how it came to my attention.

Sadly, of the original seven episodes only three have survived.

I think I saw 'The Exorcism' first time round, in '72, and it must have had quite an effect as it's stuck in my mind ever since.

I hadn't remembered the actors, though, and it was a little amusing to see Edward Petherbridge and Clive Swift comparitively young men, hair down on their collars, and in those early '70s clothes.

It was quite gripping, but a little dated in that it was a little wordy in places (which I don't see as a fault) – as was the tendency in the period – and with a left-wing message that I doubt would make it onto UK telly these days. Very much a period piece, but I thought it was quite good. It was the best-written of the three for me.

The other two were just a tad disappointing.

'Return Flight' was quite suspenseful and held my attention right to the end; but then I decided it didn't really make sense.

'A Woman Sobbing' was possibly the creepiest of the three: great work from Anna Massey and whoever did the lighting. Again, it gripped me till the end - but then I felt the ending was a bit pat and perfunctory.

Both of these gave me the impression that the writer ran out of inspiration before the end and I felt the stories weren't properly resolved.

But, as I said, even the weaker two gripped me to the end and I quite enjoyed the set. Probably a touch of nostalgia at work, too, as there was a definite '60s/'70s feel to them.

179housefulofpaper
set. 26, 2014, 6:02pm

>178 alaudacorax:

Thanks, I needed a nudge to remind me to watch this DVD. I've just watched "The Exorcism". I must confess that the message was laid on a bit too thickly for my taste (and I have to wonder whether all that railing against middle-class hypocrisy in the '60s and '70s actually helped the rise of neo-liberalism, rather than working for the vaguely or explicitly Leftist causes that the programme makers no doubt espoused).



180housefulofpaper
set. 28, 2014, 6:49pm

Hammer films' latest is out on DVD and I watched it a couple of days ago. The Quiet Ones is set in 1974 and concerns an Oxford professor attempts, with a small team, to prove the psychological basis of poltergiests and/or demonic possession and cure a teenage girl thus afflicted.

Early on the team lose the support of the University (properly, the support of one of the Colleges, I suppose) and the experiment moves to a scary old dark house.

I suppose it's an interesting twist that they tale their ghost into the scary house rather than meet it there, but there's not really much originality here. Superficially it looks like a lot of found-footage movies (a cameraman is taken on to document everything (and be the hero of the film) and his footage is spliced into the "omniscient" camera viewpoint throughout), but I think it's roots go back to earlier models.

The original script (later reworked by others as the on-screen credits, and the DVD extras, confirm) is by Tom DeVille, who was behind Urban Gothic". This was a horror anthology series from around the turn of the millennium. It was all sort on very cheap-looking video (just slightly too early to be regraded to look like film, I would guess) and the producers seemed to try to make a virtue of this by playing the "found footage" tricks that films picked up on in the next decade: security camera footage, TV show recordings, a vampire as subject of a fly-on-the-wall documentary...

The "found footage" in The Quiet Ones reminded me of that, not least because the film's characters when being filmed, seemed more like the media-savvy and rather narcissistic characters of Urban Gothic than people from 1974.

But the real debt is owed to Nigel Kneale, specifically "The Stone Tape" where another researcher pursues a materialistic theory to explain a supernatural phenomenon, with tragic consequences.

In this film, the professor (played by Jared Harris) is single-minded to the point of obsession and whilst being a more rounded character than the classic Gothic villain easily fills that role in the film, whilst Olivia Cooke as the subject of the experiment is both the victim and the monster (I was going to write that was original, then I remembered quite a few comparable film characters not least Linda Blair in The Exorcist).

181housefulofpaper
oct. 2, 2014, 4:11pm

>178 alaudacorax:

I've just watched Return Flight and my impression of two stories rather awkwardly welded together.

There's the "helpful ghosts" plot, the sort of thing that is usually presented as true life (in magazines or reality TV, for example); and then there's the character-study story focusing on the Peter Barkworth character, the sort of thing I can't help feeling the production team for this series felt more comfortable with, or perhaps felt was classier or more worthy.

In this case, it feels like the two strands worked against each other, rather than each enhancing the other.

182alaudacorax
Editat: nov. 10, 2014, 6:09am

>181 housefulofpaper:

Since you've seen it, I can say this:

I felt the 'helpful ghosts' thing that seemed to be building up and the plane crash at the end didn't tie into each other in any meaningful way - that's what I meant by it not making sense.

ETA - Edited for missing 'other'.

183alaudacorax
Editat: oct. 3, 2014, 2:47pm

I watched Cat Girl (1957) recently. An obvious rip-off of Cat People, but mildly entertaining. It's a bit more box-tickingly Gothic than Cat People - ancient family home, ancient family curse, creepy old uncle. Trouble is, when you compare the two films, Barbara Shelley, the leading lady in this one, rather suffers from comparison with Simone Simon.

ETA - Again, I thought I'd read about Cat Girl here - obviously I didn't. I can't think where I'm getting these titles from.

184housefulofpaper
oct. 3, 2014, 5:54pm

>182 alaudacorax:

I hadn't taken on board that the landing didn't go well - I should have realised that that sort of mayhem could only be implied on a BBC drama budget in 1972.

And if the haunting is only a memory or a playback of a traumatic event, and not spirits of the dead who are still sentient, then it makes sense that following the lead of a doomed aircrew will lead Peter Barkworth's character into an identical crash landing. While his character's childhood hero-worship and adult feelings of inferiority, I suppose, set up both his receptivity to the phenomena, and his decision to follow them.

It does make sense I suppose, but the fact that you have to sit back and puzzle it out means it doesn't have the immediate impact of "Exorcism".

185alaudacorax
nov. 8, 2014, 11:49pm

I've been having a 'sort of' vampire weekend.

Over in our 'Terror and Wonder ...' thread, mention is made of Mark Gatiss's 'Horror Europa'. The first film Gatiss mentions - and, if I remember aright, a favourite of his - is Daughters of Darkness (1971). I watched it last night.

At the same time I bought Vampyres (1974). I got this purely because it popped up in my Amazon recommendations, had good Amazon reviews and IMDb rating, and was dirt-cheap! I've been watching it tonight.

186alaudacorax
nov. 8, 2014, 11:51pm

>185 alaudacorax: - I have to say that I really don't share Gatiss's enthusiasm for Daughters of Darkness.

There seemed to be a number of strands of plot that didn't much come from or go anywhere, and didn't seem to mesh together (or serve a purpose?) - like the business of the bridegroom's 'mother', or that of the retired policeman, not to mention the bridegroom's weird personality and character. There were ham-fisted bits, too. For example, the director really should have been more careful about Delphine Seyrig and mirrors; once indulge in mirror-trickery in a vampire movie and you must keep things consistent - lapses stick out like sore thumbs.

Seyrig, as the Countess Bathory, had a screen presence that lifted the film. As did Andrea Rau who played the countess's sidekick - when she was onscreen; the sidekick was a secondary character, the main female characters being the countess and the young bride. The actress playing the bride was of the wooden post school and I felt that she and Andrea Rau could very usefully have swapped roles.

At the end I was left trying to figure out what I'd just watched. I'm still at a loss to describe it. It was not a horror film by any stretch of the imagination. It had very little of the supernatural, or of tension or suspense, little or nothing of shocks and scares or creepiness. The director could almost have been aiming at a Bergman-style drama, but I felt it had a strong whiff of soap opera.

187alaudacorax
nov. 8, 2014, 11:53pm

>185 alaudacorax: - I thought Vampyres much better than Daughters of Darkness.

It had many of the traditional elements the other was missing: spells of genuine suspense and tension; some scares; some real intrigue as you gradually worked out what was going on (or not, as the case may be - there's possibly a hefty twist in the tail at the very end). It had a gloriously over-the-top, dilapidated, Victorian-Gothic, country mansion (a very familiar one, too - Oakley Court, used in a lot of Hammer films), complete with cobwebby cellars and tunnels. And a graveyard featured heavily.

It also had generous helpings of nudity and eroticism.

All in all this was quite entertaining stuff - thoroughly enjoyed it.

Why did I use ‘sort of’ at the start of >185 alaudacorax:? I’m really not clear that you have traditional vampires in either film – but you’ll have to make your own minds up on that..

188alaudacorax
Editat: nov. 10, 2014, 6:06am

>186 alaudacorax: - I forgot to mention the background music in Daughters of Darkness.

It was truly awful ...

However, I think my post gives a wrong impression. I didn't think it was a bad film. It's just that I didn't think it particularly good either. Gattis seems to regard it as a classic of the genre: perhaps it is in terms of influence on later stuff - I'm not really qualified to say, but, as a stand-alone film, no - I can't see it. It did hold me till the end, though.

189housefulofpaper
nov. 10, 2014, 6:29pm

Either on the Director's commentary, or in a separate interview, I heard or read José Larraz's explanation of the plot of Vampyres and I was a bit taken aback to find it was quite different to what I'd assumed was going on. I thought Sally Faulkner's character was (unknowingly) the reincarnation of the man who murdered the vampires at the start of the film and (Spoiler! I haven't worked out how to do this properly!) the scene at the end (or rather the penultimate scene) was them going to their rest after finally getting their revenge. A pretty grim set-up, but bang-on for films in 1974 I think.

Is the music for Daughters of Darkness really that bad? It just sounds 1970s to me...

190alaudacorax
Editat: nov. 11, 2014, 7:09am

>189 housefulofpaper: - It just sounds 1970s to me... - but even more so than normal, I thought, almost like a parody. If anyone ever invented an electronic harpsichord, that's what it would sound like - and I really dislike harpsichords to start with in the first place. The music in Vampyres has similarities but is much more restrained and subtle and, so, did its job of manipulating my mood while hardly impinging on my conscious attention unless I wanted it to. Whereas with 'Daughters' it was regularly distracting my attention from the visual, and really annoying me. I honestly thought it was the worst I've heard since Michael Nyman's god-awful ruination of Carrington (1995).

The commentary you mention: I found that quite entertaining - Larraz came across as an entertaining old reprobate. I was really amused by his story of going to bed with the girl who slept with her eyes open - he was obviously quite freaked out by it.

I have to admit I can't see the Sally Faulkner thing you mention - I'll have to take special note when I watch it again. I thought that ending with the chap waking in his car was a little weak - I didn't quite get it before I heard the commentary - I felt I wasn't quite getting something, but couldn't work out what; which was why, above, I wrote about a 'possible' twist in the tail. Perhaps the camera-work could have more forcefully drawn attention to the absence of blood on his shirt at the elbow?

Just in case you haven't found it, the spoiler thing - and practically everything else you might want - is here. At the time of writing, the spoiler thing is third section from the bottom of the OP.

Edited because my inner pedant was playing hell about those sentence-ending prepositions ...

191pgmcc
nov. 11, 2014, 4:30pm

>189 housefulofpaper: & >190 alaudacorax: Apologies for butting in, but your talk of 1970s music and electronic harpsichords struck me as a coincidence as last evening I was listening to Rick Wakeman's "Journey to the Centre of the Earth". I do wish Rick hadn't insisted in putting singing pieces in his works; they get in the way of some good music.

192housefulofpaper
nov. 12, 2014, 2:23pm

>191 pgmcc: I have to confess that I've never quite shaken off the knee-jerk dismissive attitude to Rick Wakeman's Prog extravaganzas I picked up from the NME in the 1980s. I listened to Journey to the Centre of the Earth on Youtube (not quadrophonic sound, sadly) last night. It was possibly the first time I'd heard it. First thoughts...I agree the songs weren't the strongest part of it.

>190 alaudacorax: Thanks for the link (for reminding that that thread exists, actually). I was thinking about the scene with the hand gesture (the one Larraz, in the commentary, says was done by the nuns to freak out his school fellows). That's if I'm remembering the scene correctly; I couldn't find my copy of Vampyres to check.

193alaudacorax
Editat: des. 3, 2014, 4:12am

I watched the ultimate Gothic horror film last night.

It had practically all the classic tropes - deranged scientist messing with things he shouldn't, the panicky town meeting, howling mob with pitchforks, mysterious and sinister things in the cellar, graveyard in the moonlight, horrifying bodily transformations, half-demented old priest searching for answers in old tomes, glamorous love-interest imperilled (with a hair-do to make Elsa Lanchester's blood run cold), frantic chases over the rooftops ...

I also spotted references to The Matrix, Tremors, King Kong - I probably missed others.

Yes - I thoroughly recommend Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit - to Gothic cinema what Northanger Abbey is to the Gothic novel.

ETA - Not to mention some of the most atrocious puns in captivity - both verbal and visual.

194pgmcc
des. 4, 2014, 2:21am

>193 alaudacorax: I love Wallace and Grommit. Great review of the film.

195hachingoc
des. 4, 2014, 2:29am

S'ha suprimit aquest usuari en ser considerat brossa.

196hachingoc
des. 4, 2014, 2:29am

S'ha suprimit aquest usuari en ser considerat brossa.

197housefulofpaper
des. 4, 2014, 3:43pm

>193 alaudacorax:>194

The Were- Rabbit model is one of the exhibits at the British Library's Gothic exhibition.

198alaudacorax
des. 5, 2014, 5:56am

>197 housefulofpaper: - Brilliant!

Also, you don't want to know what I've done to a wax doll of hachingoc.

199alaudacorax
Editat: feb. 20, 2015, 3:57am

>17 housefulofpaper: - The film features a couple of blink-and-you'll-miss-him seconds of Douglas Wilmer as Sherlock ... Wilmer played Holmes for one season on the BBC in the 1960's ... and is still held by some to be the best screen Holmes ever ... may even no longer exist ...

http://shop.bfi.org.uk/sherlock-holmes.html#.VOb2Ny6RFe1

Just turned up in my Amazon recommendations - released on March 30th.

200housefulofpaper
feb. 21, 2015, 7:23pm

>199 alaudacorax:

This is great news. It looks as if the restoration and extra features will be on a par with the Out of the Unknown box set that was released last year (and which I'm working my way through at the moment).

On a related note I think that, following restoration, the recently-rediscovered silent film starring William Gillette as Holmes will also get a commercial release.

201alaudacorax
feb. 22, 2015, 8:32am

>200 housefulofpaper:

I've now realised that I have the vaguest of memories of seeing these as a youngster and that I've long been confusing Wilmer and Rathbone in my memories.

202housefulofpaper
abr. 4, 2015, 6:28pm

I've been enjoying Vincent Price films (the Corman-directed Poe adaptations, the Dr Phibes films, and Theatre of Blood) on Blu-ray.

203alaudacorax
abr. 5, 2015, 8:56am

I want to have a good grouch while my lunch is digesting.

I just have Freeview on my telly (it's a UK thing - you don't pay for it - I suppose it's what the US would call public service broadcasting). In recent months, a new channel has appeared, simply called 'horrorchannel'.

So far, so good, you might think. Trouble is, they make the most ridiculous and inexplicable scheduling choices.

Why on earth would they put 'Quatermass and the Pit' - a genuine classic in my book - on at 1:50pm on a Sunday afternoon? Too start with, from what I remember (haven't seen it in decades) it's going to traumatize any young kids happening upon it. And I'd love to see it again, but I'm sure as hell not going to sit indoors watching telly on a dry Sunday afternoon (no. I don't have any recording equipment). It doesn't help that whenever I've remembered to check the channel, later on in the evening - the right time to watch horror films in my book - they've been playing really down-market cack.

204housefulofpaper
abr. 5, 2015, 10:49am

>203 alaudacorax:

With some soul-searching I went with satellite TV about 10 years ago. I got really bad TV reception in the analogue days, and I doubt that now Freeview would work for me at all (even if my TV aerial hadn't come down in a storm a while back).

There are digital radio, as well as TV stations, broadcasting on the Sky platform, so it's useful for recording radio programmes longer than a cassette tape, that I might want to keep; or programmes I couldn't otherwise pick up - such as the archive recordings of Mervyn Wall on RTÉ the past two Sundays.

205housefulofpaper
abr. 5, 2015, 10:59am

>204 housefulofpaper:

Maybe I should have explained how I keep those recordings - I've got a DVD recorder, so I can play back from the Sky Box to that and record onto DVD. It so happens

I've also got a turntable/ cassette deck. CD burner, which has an "aux" input. So with a DVD recorder hooked up as the "aux" I can record from the DVD to a more convenient CD (although DVD will allow a longer recording time).

206alaudacorax
abr. 6, 2015, 2:46pm

>205 housefulofpaper:

The trouble is that it's just once in a blue moon that I want to record something. It never even crossed my mind with the Quatermass - just thought that I'd probably catch up with it some time or other.

Actually, after writing the last sentence, I went over to Amazon and found a Quatermass box set which I've put on my 'Do I really want this' wish list.

207housefulofpaper
abr. 6, 2015, 6:12pm

>206 alaudacorax:

Is that a box set the films or of the original TV serials? (you might want to know that episodes 3-6 of the TV The Quatermass Experiment no longer exist, if it's the TV version you were looking at).

208alaudacorax
abr. 6, 2015, 10:24pm

>207 housefulofpaper:

Yes, there was a lot about that in the Amazon reviews.

In the meantime, I realise I'd got myself confused. I've discovered there are two versions of 'Quatermass and The Pit' - the television (1958) and cinema (1967) versions - and of at least one of the other episodes. Clearly, it was the original TV series that had me hiding behind the settee as a little lad (talk about traumatizing young kids), but it seems to be the cinema films I'm remembering bits of.

I suppose I'll just have to buy the lot at some point ...

209housefulofpaper
abr. 7, 2015, 2:35pm

>208 alaudacorax:

I suppose "my" Quatermass was Sir John Mills in the 1979 serial.

210Rembetis
abr. 10, 2015, 6:31pm

>207 housefulofpaper: >208 alaudacorax: I love Quatermass! I first came across the Hammer versions in the 1970s courtesy of the brilliant late night horror double bills on BBC (full list here: http://www.worldheadpress.com/bbc2-horror-double-bill-183 ), then eagerly watched the Sir John Mills version in 1979. Finally saw the 1958 tv series when it was released on VHS in the late 1980s. Scripted by Nigel Kneale, and starring Andre Morell - the 1958 version is my favourite Quatermass - intelligent, gripping, and very scary television, with one scene making me jump out of my skin! It's remarkable that it still stands up today, nearly six decades after it was made. The dvd is excellent, but the whole thing is available free on you tube.

211LolaWalser
abr. 10, 2015, 10:20pm

Count me as another fan of the original Quatermass! I raved about the soundtrack of the first "Quatermass and the Pit" somewhere here already.

Is the seventies miniseries worth pursuing?

212alaudacorax
abr. 11, 2015, 5:34am

The vagaries of one's memory are fascinating in themselves. A strong childhood memory is of hiding behind the settee when Quatermass was on telly, yet it's bits of the Hammer films that seem to have stuck in my mind, not the telly version; but, at the same time, it's André Morell who is MY Quatermass - scrambled memory.

I must have seen the John Mills ones, but all I have is a vague memory of red skies and stone circles.

213Rembetis
abr. 11, 2015, 2:22pm

>211 LolaWalser: I thought the John Mills 1979 Quatermass series was enjoyable and exciting, but not in the same league as the Hammer efforts or the 1958 series. Nigel Kneale's script wasn't as tight. Still anything he wrote is always worth watching (have you seen his 70s anthology 'Beasts'? That is really excellent tv).

The 79 miniseries is all on youtube - the first part of the first episode is here if you want to get a taster: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43EZbisZvqc&list=PL5DF7E07271F2AD65

214housefulofpaper
abr. 12, 2015, 6:10am

There's a very full Wikipedia entry for Quatermass/Quatermass IV/The Quatermass Conclusion.

I remember being very impressed with it on first viewing (bearing in mind I would only have been 12 at the time). I have got it on DVD - I've got a stack on DVDs to watch that almost matched the unread books pile - and watched the first episode yesterday. Although it shows its age in places, and Nigel Kneale's pessimism about the Modern world (i.e. the 1960s/1970s, remembering the script's long gestation period) maybe looks a little strident.

Or maybe not. One of the criticisms the series got was against the "Planet People", for being a hopelessly old-fashioned buch of hippies during the hight of Punk. And yet, there was something of a reappraisal from the 90s onwards. This was after "the second Summer of Love", outdoor raves, New Age Travellers/Crusties, and pitched battles between Ravers and Travellers on one side, and police on the other, at Stonehenge. What I take from that is, where Nigel Kneale maybe looks to have got it wrong or be behind the times, he might actually be ahead of everyone else.

The production is all shot on film, which makes it unbelievably lavish compared to the BBC serials, and actually looks bigger than the Hammer films (but at the same time more dour and 1970s). The soundtrack is an electronic score, all performed on synthesiser(s) I would guess.

215alaudacorax
abr. 13, 2015, 10:07pm

>213 Rembetis: - That reminds me - I'm still only half-way through 'Beasts' (like houseful, I've managed to build up a 'To watch' stack of DVDs). To be honest, I wasn't overly impressed with the ones I've seen so far - I think 'Buddyboy', 'Baby' and 'What Big Eyes'. Or, at least, I wasn't overly impressed by 'Buddyboy' - that's probably colouring my memory of the other two.

>214 housefulofpaper: - I had a 'What the hell/You can't take it with you' moment and ordered the Quatermass first series box set and the three early Hammer films. Still awaiting delivery at the moment.

>213 Rembetis: - I've just had a quick glance at the John Mills one over on YouTube: it's pretty good picture quality for YT, so I must watch it some evening soon, before the copyright hounds catch up with them.

216alaudacorax
abr. 13, 2015, 10:20pm

>215 alaudacorax: - ... wasn't overly impressed by 'Buddyboy' ...

Just found some notes: I felt Kneale got so far and then ran out of inspiration and, thus, spoilt the story with a pretty feeble ending.

217Rembetis
abr. 14, 2015, 12:03pm

>216 alaudacorax: 'Buddyboy' is indeed the weakest episode of 'Beasts'. I'm surprised you didn't enjoy 'Baby' - it's my favourite of the lot! 'What Big Eyes' also impressed me.

I hope you enjoy the Hammer Quatermass movies and the 1958 'Quatermass and the Pit' - let us know what you think when you get round to watching them. Enjoy!

218LolaWalser
abr. 14, 2015, 12:18pm

>213 Rembetis:

Thanks, I started watching the other night, the first part. It reminds me of some other "Stonehengy" serial from the seventies... something with screaming children too...

Oh, and of a great movie whose title escapes me--British, possibly made for television, post-nuclear apocalypse. Made on the budget of a school play, probably, but with fantastic results.

Does anyone have any idea what I'm talking about? Late seventies-early eighties max, Britain is ravaged by famine and radiation sickness, some girl has a baby (conceived before the catastrophe) and drags herself with it over the countryside... Everything terrifically devastated, grey and grimy.

219housefulofpaper
abr. 14, 2015, 2:37pm

> 218

First guess - Stonehenge = Children of the Stones; apocalypse = Threads.

220LolaWalser
abr. 14, 2015, 3:50pm

>219 housefulofpaper:

omg yesssss!! On both! So you have seen "Threads"? What did you think?

221housefulofpaper
abr. 14, 2015, 6:14pm

>220 LolaWalser:

Sorry, I never saw it (or its predecessor, Peter Watkins' The War Game). Perhaps the reason - if it's anything more than squeamishness (not about the gore but about the emotional impact - a very male response, that!) is that I don't fee any need to be convinced about how terrible the effects of a nuclear strike would be. I'm sure I felt the same in 1984.

The initial broadcast was well publicised, I remember. In fact, a photograph of the traffic warden with his bandaged face and gun was used as the cover of that week's Radio Times (Googling "Radio Times" and "Threads" was sufficient to call up an image).

222LolaWalser
abr. 16, 2015, 10:36am

It's the sort of thing you may not go out of your way to see (I'm a great big escapist myself and only gave it a look because someone praised it to the skies), but if you start watching, it's impossible to stop.

223housefulofpaper
abr. 18, 2015, 8:39pm

>210 Rembetis:
That list of BBC2 Horror Double Bills is incomplete! Between July and September 1983 I had my first viewing of the classic Universal Horror films (on a p/w portable TV in the bedroom I shared with my brother; and one of those old-fashioned hard plastic earphones in one ear, so the sound didn't disturb him) courtesy of the last full series .

I'd remembered - how could I forget? - that it opened with the Browning/Lugosi Dracula, but couldn't quite remember the complete list. However, there was an article about these double bills in the Sept/Oct 2013 issue of The Dark Side ("The Magazine of the Macabre") by Denis Meikle, which includes this rundown for 1983: 16/7/83 Dracula, Frankenstein; 16/7/83 The Bride of Frankenstein; 23/7/83 Dracula's Daughter, Son of Frankenstein; 30/7/83 The Mummy, Ghost of Frankenstein; 6/8/83 The Wolfman, Frankenstein Meets the Wolfman; 13/8/83 Son of Dracula, House of Frankenstein; 20/8/83 The Mummy's Hand, House of Dracula; 3/9/83 The Black Cat, The Raven, Murders in the Rue Morgue.

I have to assume the data is correct, although I was sure I'd seen more than one Mummy sequel.

The Radio Times (which ran an interview with Elsa Lanchester to tie in with the series) said the series would culminate with the Hammer Frankenstein and Dracula, but that never happened.

>222 LolaWalser:
Looking for (and finding!) the Douglas Wilmer Sherlock Holmes in HMV, I also found a copy of Threads, so I'll finally be watching it before too long.

224alaudacorax
abr. 19, 2015, 5:08am

>223 housefulofpaper:

'Son of Dracula'? That one stood out of your list immediately. I've just been looking at its IMDb page and I'm pretty sure I've never heard of it, never seen it. And, now, of course, I've just got to see it. And there are a couple of others I've been meaning to re-watch for years.

Sometime ... sometime ... at the moment I have a stack of waiting-to-be-watched DVDs here, especially those Quatermass ones, but I seem to have slipped out of the mood, somehow - something to do with the lighter evenings and the prolonged spell of fine weather we're having, probably. We need a spell of rain ...

225Rembetis
abr. 19, 2015, 5:11am

>210 Rembetis: Many thanks - I have that issue of 'Dark Side' but had never compared their list with the on-line list. What a marvellous education the BBC gave us in classic horror movies in the 70s!

226alaudacorax
maig 17, 2015, 4:54am

I finally got round to watching the '58 'Quatermass and the Pit' TV series last night (haven't been in the right mood for such things for a few weeks).

It certainly brought back my childhood watching - don't think I've seen it since. As >210 Rembetis: says, it still stands up very well today. Not least because of what it doesn't show you. Particularly evocative was the sound track >211 LolaWalser: which I think has been there, in the back of my mind, as the way to soundtrack such things ever since - I think it was a big part of the 'hiding behind the settee' thing.

Incidentally, Anthony Bushell as the slowly unravelling army bigwig impressed me very much - I see him as a supporting character in so many old, black and white things where I can't, offhand, remember him being called on to do any real acting - but really gave it his all, here.

227LolaWalser
maig 17, 2015, 11:39am

Speaking of Threads, I noticed someone referenced it in an article in The Guardian in regard to your recent elections... :)

228LolaWalser
maig 17, 2015, 11:54am

The thread is now three years old (long?) so I apologise if this came up before, but as I'm still looking--oh for a nice clean copy of the 1933 Mystery of the Wax Museum with Lionel Atwill, Glenda Farrell and Fay Wray (directed by Michael 'Casablanca' Curtiz). Does anyone know of any? I wish somebody would put together a box set of Atwill's best horror, shame he's so neglected.

In other news, I saw The Fanatic, Tallulah Bankehad's last movie, from 1965--maybe the best of the "former glamour star makes a turn as a super-creepy old woman" genre, if you favour drama over camp. Worth pursuing.

229housefulofpaper
maig 17, 2015, 12:37pm

>228 LolaWalser:

Lola, it's an bonus feature on the Region 2 DVD of House of Wax (the Vincent Price version).

230LolaWalser
maig 17, 2015, 12:42pm

Arrgh!! What a slight! It should be the other way 'round! I love Price but except for the Phibes movies his colour production is barely watchable. Hmm, region 2, dammit... Thanks, will investigate. I suppose it's too much to expect a Criterion treatment one of these days? They did The Island of Lost Souls after all...

231Rembetis
maig 17, 2015, 2:52pm

>230 LolaWalser: Lola, 'Mysteries of the Wax Museum' is on the Region 1 dvd too, again, as a bonus. What a bonus!:

http://www.amazon.com/House-Wax-Vincent-Price/dp/B00009NHBC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&a...

232alaudacorax
maig 17, 2015, 7:36pm

I don't suppose anyone knows how to access the missing scripts on the 'Quatermass Experiment' DVD? I have the requisite computer with DVD-ROM drive, but the 'Right click the DVD once it appears on screen ... to explore the contents' instruction is proving distinctly unhelpful.

233alaudacorax
maig 17, 2015, 7:38pm

>232 alaudacorax: - I'd forgotten about the missing episodes and now I'm majorly p****d off.

234alaudacorax
maig 18, 2015, 9:58am

>232 alaudacorax: - Frustration upon frustration. Found out how to access the scripts (never had to access a pdf from a DVD before and had to find out how for myself as they were quite inaccessible using the resources of the DVD alone), only to find they are almost unreadable - it will be a Herculean task to work through them. And do I really want to pay £20-odd for a paper version?

235alaudacorax
maig 18, 2015, 10:01am

>232 alaudacorax: - Never mind - 'Quatermass II' tonight.

236alaudacorax
maig 18, 2015, 10:21am

>229 housefulofpaper: is officially a bad influence (and the rest of you) - I've a stack of unwatched DVDs to get through and only went to Amazon to put that on a wish list, but couldn't resist - it is TWO films and it was only £7-25. I may be desperate for that £7-25 someday ...

237Rembetis
maig 18, 2015, 2:38pm

>232 alaudacorax: - 236 Sorry to hear about your difficulties with the PDF files. I've never tried to access them as I recall a review at the time saying they were almost unreadable.
Would have responded earlier but I am in Cornwall at the moment in an area with circa 1981 internet capabilities. Hope you enjoy 'Quatermass II'. And £7.25 for the two Wax films is a bargain - you won't regret it!

238LolaWalser
maig 18, 2015, 4:06pm

>231 Rembetis:

Yes, I saw! Ordered--there's probably little chance of getting a fancier issue.

>236 alaudacorax:

Ha! :) I think you won't be disappointed. It was made pre-Code and has an altogether different atmosphere and style to what came after. It's also a technical curiosity, made in two-colour Technicolor, just right for the uncanny wax figures.

239housefulofpaper
maig 18, 2015, 4:09pm

I apologise for being a bad influence!

I had a look at the PDF files for the first time tonight. I don't think I could struggle through them. The prices for the paperback version on ABE books are shocking, especially since there must be plenty of copies around. It's worth while keeping an eye out in charity shops.

240housefulofpaper
maig 25, 2015, 6:45pm

>230 LolaWalser:

What about "Theatre of Blood"?

I looked for "The Fanatic" but it's been out of print for about a decade. Strangely enough the last release in the UK seemingly used the US title (which might indicate a ropey old print that's claimed to be public domain).

241alaudacorax
Editat: maig 26, 2015, 5:32am

>240 housefulofpaper: - I absolutely loved that! Haven't seen it in years - decades, probably.

ETA - I meant 'Theatre of Blood' - I think I haven't seen 'The Fanatic'.

242LolaWalser
maig 26, 2015, 1:19pm

>240 housefulofpaper:

I'd have to remind myself of which one is that--I was thinking generally of all the Poe and American Gothic adaptations--probably seen too often, known too well. I remembered later I'd liked "The fly" a lot too.

Watching "House of Wax", it's true Price's mere presence does wonders. Not that the film is bad, I liked it well enough. Absolutely loved Carolyn Jones (what a lovely surprise to see her!) and the warmhearted ditz she played--too bad she got killed off so early. The other one wasn't fun at all, typical melodrama good girl.

All in all a delightful DVD. The copy of Mystery of the wax museum is pretty much as I remember seeing in a repertory theatre. Somehow or other and despite the presence of a screwball comedy duo it has so much more atmosphere than the remake. The scenes with Atwill in the cellar, for instance. I guess part of it is sheer technical difference, the sfumato of the older version working WITH the material, while the thick pastiness of the later one sabotages it.

243housefulofpaper
maig 27, 2015, 5:51pm

>242 LolaWalser:

Great description of the two Wax films. I might be wrong, but when I watched Mystery of the Wax Museum I had the feeling that it breathed the same air, so to speak, as the '30s shudder pulps.

Theatre of Blood is also known as Much Ado About Murder, apparently.

244LolaWalser
maig 27, 2015, 6:49pm

I'll give it a watch tonight.

Have you seen "Dragonwyck"? Now that one checks off on all the attractions of hyper-Gothic--a castle-like dwelling, mysterious illness, dark secret (involving another, rather more unnameable illness), a beautiful ingenue, kissing cousins, murder, madness and Usheresque dissolution.

And Vincent Price in gorgeous youth, sans 'stache.

245housefulofpaper
maig 29, 2015, 5:36pm

>244 LolaWalser:

I was hoping to reply in the affirmative, and make some intelligent observations too. I was able to make an off-air copy a few years ago, but haven't sat and watched it yet. Hopefully I'll have a chance to see it over the weekend.

I did recently see Price in Twice Told Tales, which tried to do for Nathaniel Hawthorne what Corman and AIP did for Poe. Price is as good as ever, but overall the film just shows how good the AIP series was.

246LolaWalser
juny 5, 2015, 2:50pm

Turns out I was confusing Theatre of Blood with Madhouse or something--I'd never seen it before! Diana Rigg and Vincent Price in the same movie? The story is a pale Phibes knockoff but for that pairing I'd forgive much worse. And the bit players--Robert Morley, Diana Dors, Joan Hickson... Jack Hawkins whom I'd only seen before in The League of Perfect Gentlemen (a favourite)... Arthur Lowe, a recent discovery on someone's private YouTube channel, in an adorable old TV series, Pardon the expression.. and others I don't know by name but certainly have seen... all in all, very enjoyable!

Do you watch movies online? If yes, let me know if you'd like a link to The Fanatic and I'll PM it to you. I found a real treasure trove but am superstitious about linking in public--everything seems to disappear as soon as I do that.

247veilofisis
juny 6, 2015, 2:47am

LolaLolaLolaLolaLola!!

So, in the interest of utter self-indulgence, THEATRE OF OF BLOOD is something I've been trying to adapt for the stage since I finished directing MACBETH two years ago... I mean, come on, someone tell me I'm brilliant!

Also, hi, clearly I'm not dead. My extended absences from this group are really ridiculous, considering I created the damn thing. Miss the dialogue, folks. Hope you're all well.

248pgmcc
juny 6, 2015, 5:53am

>247 veilofisis: Great to see your head pop over the parapet. All's well. Keep Calm and Keep Posting!

249alaudacorax
juny 6, 2015, 7:54am

>248 pgmcc: - Echoing what pgmcc said - always good to see you, veil.

250alaudacorax
juny 6, 2015, 7:59am

>244 LolaWalser: - Saw Dragonwyck years and years ago, but it must be good as big chunks of it have stuck in my memory. Great stuff - I'd like to see that again.

I took a stack of DVDS of the stuff we've mentioned on holiday with me last week, for the evenings - never even switched on the TV - perhaps now I'm home.

251Rembetis
juny 6, 2015, 9:59pm

>247 veilofisis: I saw an adaptation of 'Theatre of Blood' in (of all places) the National Theatre in London, in 2005. It was adapted by the British company Improbable (written by Lee Simpson and Phelim McDermott), and set in 1973, wholly inside an abandoned theatre.
The great Jim Broadbent played Lionheart, and, in a nice touch, Diana Rigg's daughter, Rachael Stirling, played Lionheart's daughter. The excellent Bette Bourne took on the Robert Morley part (with the delicious poodles). The set design of the derelict theatre was outstanding, and the audience at the performance I saw certainly found the show delightful, with much laughter, and gasps at the level of gore. It was very grand guignol! I still can't figure out how they did the drowning in Malmsey, it was so realistic. The exaggerated and grotesque swelling of Bette Bourne's stomach as he was force fed has stuck in my mind, as has Broadbent very loudly cracking open a critic's chest with a crowbar to get at his 'pound of flesh'.

252LolaWalser
juny 7, 2015, 11:09am

JJJJJJJJJ! So good to see you! Oh-you're brilliant! But you knew that.

So how was THE SCOTTISH PLAY?! Did the roof cave in? Anyone burst in flames on stage? Rabid raccoons streak through the audience? Theatre of blood must be a ton of fun to stage and play. Do it, do it, do it!

>250 alaudacorax:

Peter, I think you can find Dragonwyck online in good quality, if that helps.

>251 Rembetis:

Sounds a lovely production. Have you seen Price's Doctor Phibes movies and what do you think about the similarities?

253housefulofpaper
juny 7, 2015, 3:42pm

>247 veilofisis:

Belated echoes of all good wishes etc, too; and I'd like to hear how your Macbeth went, as well. It's all pertinent to the Gothic theme!

>246 LolaWalser:

Apologies for not replying sooner...thank you for the offer, but actually I don't watch films online (not yet, anyway: stuff that doesn't get transmitted by the tv channels any more, and isn't available on DVD, is - I've discovered - on things like iTunes, Netflix, Amazon Prime...so maybe it's just a matter of time. Although if I like something, I do like to have a physical copy).

254Rembetis
juny 7, 2015, 7:41pm

>252 LolaWalser: Hi Lola! Yes I have seen the Phibes movies, and you're right, there are strong similarities between them and 'Theatre of Blood', not least the storyline of a demented man taking elaborate revenge on a group of people through a series of extravagant murders. It seems like 'Theatre' was made to cash in on 'Phibes' success. However, the Phibes films (particularly 'The Abominable Dr Phibes') are far more poetic, and the tone and feel of 'Theatre of Blood' is completely different.

'Theatre of Blood' was one of Price's favourite films. He was ecstatic with Lionheart, as he felt this was his chance to play the Shakespearean roles which typecasting had prevented in his career. He was also ecstatic about the cast, understandably, as here was the cream of British acting talent at that time - I don't think Price ever had a stronger supporting cast. 'Theatre of Blood' is definitely one of Price's strongest performances and films, and, although derivative, it has a literate and very witty script.

Talking of Vincent Price, there are some events later this year in England to celebrate his life, with his daughter Victoria attending many of them. Sadly, the cost is a bit extortionate! I am tempted with the 'Theatre of Blood' walking tour in Kensall Green cemetery on 4 November (cheap at £5):

http://vincentpricelegacy.uk/

255veilofisis
juny 7, 2015, 10:43pm

Oh, so many friendly faces!

Macbeth was such a treat, everyone was wonderful. I directed Salomesoon after (and played Herodias at the same time), and that show nearly broke me: it was some sort of weird BLACK SWAN thing or something. But I made it out alive and put up an original adaptation of Les Liaisons Dangereuses just a few months ago. Closed it and took off to Wellington, NZ to visit my best friend for an extended holiday. In other words, theatre is doing well enough by me and I (hopefully!) by it.

In somewhat Gothic news, my list of reads and rereads (I've been woefully lax at cataloging on here over the last year) in Kiwi country, should anyone be dying to know: Confessions of an English Opium-Eater, Maldoror (three separate translations!), Salammbô, endless Patti Smith poems, some weird history of chess piece designs, a half dozen back-issues of ELLE DECOR, and M. R. James, because he's a fun guy to travel with.

If anyone finds this remotely interesting, the three albums that have been literally haunting me since the day I stepped into Wellington: BERLIN, Lou Reed; RADIO ETHIOPIA, Patti Smith; and DESERTSHORE, Nico. Apparently you can take a California punk out of the goth clubs, but you can't take the... Oh, nevermind. Even wading through all that gloom, the soundtrack of my days here just light me the f*ck up!

So glad I dipped my toe back into the Haunted Castle and got a few words out! Maybe I can take the next few weeks I have left here and, oh I don't know, resurrect my worm-eaten lit journals with some new posts!

I'll try to keep in touch. I promise!

- Jourdain

256alaudacorax
Editat: juny 9, 2015, 7:23am

>255 veilofisis: - I'm now scratching my head to think of a Gothic film - or story, or novel - set in New Zealand ... you'll have to write one, v ...

257abbottthomas
juny 9, 2015, 8:03am

>256 alaudacorax: I'm not sure if Peter Jackson's Braindead fits into your Gothic category but it is set in New Zealand (looking like the UK in 1950) and its heart is in the right place. "A young man's mother is bitten by a Sumatran rat-monkey........"

While I'm here, was THe House of Wax originally issued in 3D? I seem to recall a gratuitous scene with a barker batting a ball on elastic at the camera.

258veilofisis
Editat: juny 9, 2015, 9:21am

256

I suppose we could argue HEAVENLY CREATURES, despite being based upon a true story, is quite Gothic...

259housefulofpaper
juny 9, 2015, 5:15pm

>256 alaudacorax:

Hmm, maybe The Navigator: A Medieval Odyssey and The Piano?

>257 abbottthomas:

Yep. And famously the director had lost an eye and couldn't see in 3D.

260alaudacorax
Editat: juny 10, 2015, 3:52am

A quick search online came up with Gothic NZ: The Darker Side of Kiwi Culture ...

'Kiwi Gothic' seems to be to be an academically significant phrase, though it's not in the indices of any of my books - there is a lot to be found about it online.

I found this article interesting - Kiwi Gothic. Incidentally, I draw veilofisis's attention to the penultimate paragraph's mention of 'Wellington intelligentsia' - might throw some light on what kind of people she's found herself amongst.

I think I'd better resist the temptation to link all the interesting articles I've found, but, for the purposes of this thread, the 1995 documentary Cinema of Unease: A Personal Journey by Sam Neill, seems to be regarded as important and influential on later NZ cinema. I'd really like to see that.

Suffice to say that in >256 alaudacorax: I'd totally underestimated the significance of the Gothic in NZ culture (pakeha culture, anyway). Sorry, Kiwis.

ETA - And, yes, 'Heavenly Creatures' and 'The Piano' keep cropping up in these articles. I've never watched 'The Piano' because of Michael Nyman's godawful, brain-rotting music ... there's always subtitles, I suppose ...

261alaudacorax
juny 16, 2015, 5:29am

>229 housefulofpaper:, >236 alaudacorax:

So I bought 'House of Wax' and guess what Amazon recommended for me on the strength of it ...

Yes, you've guessed it ...



That's Amazon's best since I bought the CD of Beethoven chamber music and they recommended a box set of 'Sgt. Bilko' because of it ...

262alaudacorax
juny 16, 2015, 5:32am

And why the hell am I looking at my Amazon recommendations page? I KNOW very well what a dangerous combination internet plus credit card is!

263pgmcc
juny 16, 2015, 5:54am

Pugh; Pugh; Barney McGrew;Cuthbert;Dibble; Grub!

264housefulofpaper
ag. 10, 2015, 4:52pm

>260 alaudacorax:

Alaudacorax, Cinema of Unease: A Personal Journey by Sam Neill is available to rent on the BFI Player for £2.50.

I've only used it to see free stuff, so far (including some footage of Reading's trolley buses (in 1938) only a stones' throw from my house. Exciting or what? ;-))

265IanFryer
ag. 13, 2015, 8:43am

As an addition to this thread, some exciting news for me. I'm in discussions to do an illustrated talk about Hammer Films for the library authority I work for. That should be great!

266housefulofpaper
ag. 13, 2015, 2:32pm

>265 IanFryer:

Congratulations!

267alaudacorax
ag. 14, 2015, 6:31am

>264 housefulofpaper: - Thanks for the reminder, houseful - I'd forgotten I wanted to see that.

>265 IanFryer: - Not sure if I should say 'Good luck' or 'Break a leg' in that scenario - delete as appropriate!

268IanFryer
ag. 14, 2015, 6:52pm

Thanks. I love yakking about film and Hammer is a fascinating subject. Before the horror films they made some terrific little film noirs.

269Soukesian
ag. 23, 2015, 5:16pm

The films of Jesus "Jess" Franco certainly aren't for everyone, but most have an undeniable touch of the Gothic, and the recently published Murderous Passions is the first of two volumes of what wiil be an exhaustive study of his prolific output. It's a labour of love, a magnificently lavish tome which many more respectable and widely respected directors might envy.

270LolaWalser
ag. 23, 2015, 9:15pm

>269 Soukesian:

The films of Jesus "Jess" Franco certainly aren't for everyone,

Who are they for?

271IanFryer
ag. 24, 2015, 4:44am

At his mid-late 60s peak he was quite watchable, but you certainly need a lot of patience with tromboning zoom lenses in his 1970s work. Check out The Awful Dr. Orloff (1962) or The Diabolocal Dr. Z (1966). IMDB lists Franco as having 203 directorial credits from 1957 to 2013!

272alaudacorax
ag. 24, 2015, 6:34am

I have to admit to finding one or two of his films from the `70s a guilty pleasure, after being introduced to them by some documentary Jonathan Ross did on the wilder ranges of cinema. Looking at the vast list of films he has on IMDb, though, I realise I've barely scratched the surface, and I do remember I've seen some stinkers by him, so ...

273Soukesian
ag. 24, 2015, 6:46am

>270 LolaWalser: For Jess himself, I suppose, though he lived to see them celebrated by a fanatical following. Personal favorites include Virgin Among the Living Dead and Rites of Frankenstein. But, yes, his films came increasingly fast and loose, and often improvised. For aficionados, this lends them a dreamlike quality. Others, they simply put to sleep, or drive to distraction.

274IanFryer
ag. 24, 2015, 7:09am

Seeing them in original aspect ratio and decent picture quality makes a big difference. I recall seeing a TV screenin of Dracula, Prisoner of Frankenstein years ago and it looked just awful. The great character actor Dennis Price was in it looking ill and lost, which was an upsetting sight,

275LolaWalser
Editat: ag. 24, 2015, 11:00am

Aquest missatge ha estat suprimit pel seu autor.

276alaudacorax
Editat: ag. 25, 2015, 5:13am

>275 LolaWalser:

Bloody hell, Lola! You can't say things like that in public! Anyway, I don't believe that's actually possible standing up in a hammock, especially not with all those pickled gherkins.

277LolaWalser
ag. 25, 2015, 9:55am

So THAT's how that rumour got started! Better watch out for those fancy tail feathers! ;)

278alaudacorax
ag. 31, 2015, 7:33am

It's strange, the tangles one can carry around in the mind. I've just discovered that, for decades, I've confused and conflated Roger Corman with Wes Craven. So, when I read this morning of Craven's death, I immediately thought of Vincent Price and 'Usher', 'Masque of the Red Death' ...

Anyway, RIP Wes Craven.

279housefulofpaper
set. 13, 2015, 6:14pm

Finally saw Dragonwyck today. This is clearly the film Roger Corman had in mind when he cast Vincent Price as Roderick Usher.

All the Gothic tropes were present and correct, but I was surprised by the political elements of the story. It's a period of US history I knew nothing about (patroons and the anti-rent war). The treatment seemed sophisticated, but then Ernst Lubitsch was attached to the project in its early stages.

280LolaWalser
set. 13, 2015, 6:40pm

Did you LIKE it?! I think it's a really good flick.

281housefulofpaper
set. 13, 2015, 8:00pm

>280 LolaWalser:

Yes I did like it. It was cleverer (in its use of secondary characters, its politics,) than I expected, which was a pleasant surprise, but the important thing is it worked on my emotions. I'm turning into an old softy, clearly.

I noticed from a bit of googling that the film's never had particularly good reviews though. Here's a stinker from the Radio Times website (an old review from a 1980s print edition, at a guess).

"This preposterous old tosh, a sort of Manderley-on-the-Hudson"..."Vincent Price hams quite extraordinarily"..."there's a great deal of pleasure to be had from watching these ludicrous performances on phoney sets, but you can't escape the feeling that once it was meant to be taken seriously."

282LolaWalser
set. 14, 2015, 11:45am

lol, what a fool...

Thank god for Vincent Price's ham!

283alaudacorax
set. 15, 2015, 7:34am

Vincent Price could be a bit of a ham, but, though I haven't seen Dragonwyck in many, many years and memory is fallible, I'm remembering it as one of Price's least hammy perfomances.

284LolaWalser
set. 15, 2015, 12:07pm

Yeah, I don't think it's useful to analyse this genre as if it were nouvelle vague or something. It plays by different rules.

Besides, I want to note here my eternal love for high-voltage dramatics, phony sets, shabby costuming, unbelievable monsters and so on. The more the floorboards creak the happier I am.

Maybe that's the inner theatre freak speaking--I don't give a damn for "verisimilitude", I only want the poetry.

285housefulofpaper
set. 15, 2015, 3:03pm

>284 LolaWalser:

Yeah, I don't think it's useful to analyse this genre as if it were nouvelle vague or something. It plays by different rules.

Agreed. In fact I think the Radio Times reviewer knew that too. He's sort of communicating it to his readers under the lofty dismissiveness.

286alaudacorax
Editat: set. 18, 2015, 9:31am

>284 LolaWalser:

... by different rules

Yeah, I agree, too. Also, I'm not sure that 'high-voltage dramatics' isn't one of the prerequisites for anything we could firmly categorise as 'Gothic films' (or, possibly, it's a youthful diet of Vincent Price and his like that has made me think this way ...)

ETA - Since I wrote that I've mulling over my idea of the archetypal Gothic film, and I can't get past House of Usher with - of course - Vincent Price.

287alaudacorax
set. 18, 2015, 9:34am

... and now I can't remember what I came to LibraryThing to look up ...

288alaudacorax
set. 26, 2015, 12:26pm

>41 housefulofpaper:
>168 alaudacorax:

Just come back from a week's holiday on the Gower peninsula. I find I'm now absolutely incapable of enjoying waves breaking on a rocky shoreline during a strong blow without Ray Milland's opening voiceover buzzing into my mind - "They call them the haunted shores ..."

289housefulofpaper
set. 29, 2015, 10:47am

>288 alaudacorax:

The Haunted would be a good one to re-watch for Halloween. By sheer coincidence I saw (and bought) a copy of Black Apples of Gower by Iain Sinclair today in Waterstones.

290LolaWalser
Editat: oct. 30, 2015, 12:45pm

I saw The Devil-Doll (Lionel Barrymore in drag! Maureen O'Sullivan in miniature, and Tod Browning directing!) was included in a "Legends of Horror" Warner Bros. collection and that sparked a mini-splurge (on mostly old horror). I've been looking for The Devil-Doll for years. There's also Doctor X with Lionel Atwill which I had seen before, but also The return of Doctor X, which I hadn't--with Humphrey Bogart in an "Igor" role! Great box (also included Mark of the Vampire, The mask of Fu Manchu, Mad Love--with Lugosi, Karloff and Lorre, respectively.

ETA: also bought the sets of Creature from the Black Lagoon and "The fly" (from the sixties) movies, and The Blood Beast Terror with Cushing. (What could possibly outdo that title?)

291DavidX
Editat: oct. 30, 2015, 3:20pm

I love The Devil Doll! It is been one of my favorite films since childhood. Mad Love is unforgettable as well.

Have you seen The Old Dark House(1932) with Ernest Thesiger, Boris Karloff, Charles Laughton, et al? I must also mention Dead of Night(1945) with the incredible Michael Redgrave performance as a mad ventriloquist. The Unholy Three(1930) and The Unknown(1927) with Lon Chaney come to mind as well.


292LolaWalser
Editat: oct. 30, 2015, 5:21pm

I looove The Old Dark House! It also had Raymond Massey and Melvyn Douglas and, especially dear to my heart, comrade Gloria Stuart--gorgeous woman and leftist, a union activist in old Hollywood.

I'm not familiar with that movie of Redgrave's but I've seen a couple other where he plays creepy villains, one with Joan Bennett, IIRC... Oh and I LOVE those Chaney Senior's movies--what a shame they are so hard to come by. I was lucky to see The Unholy Three in a retrospective on the big screen, but otherwise it's hard to come by anything but DVD-R stuff, basically "print-on-demand" DVDs.

Edited: Aaaack! Was thinking Gloria and wrote Lilian!

293LolaWalser
oct. 30, 2015, 4:42pm

P.S. Just to add--Ernest Thesiger of the MAGNIFICENT nose was also in the original The Ghoul with Karloff. And I've been looking for years for a--British I believe--picture in which he plays the strangler. I saw it yonks ago and don't remember the title or anything much beyond atmosphere... lots of sinister weather.

294housefulofpaper
oct. 30, 2015, 4:59pm

>293 LolaWalser:

A quick look on Thesiger's IMDB page suggests They Drive by Night - an original British version from 1939. Never heard of it before, but I'm intrigued now.

295LolaWalser
oct. 30, 2015, 5:10pm

Hmmm... I suppose it could be--I remember nothing about the convict, but the rain as a trigger seems familiar... Wait, I think this other review (Ernest the great!) clinches it--but don't read it if you don't want spoilers.

Thanks! Now to see whether it's available anywhere...

296DavidX
oct. 30, 2015, 5:14pm

"The Old Dark House" is a perfect film with a perfect cast. I love "The Ghoul" as well. I don't think I have seen the one with Thesiger as the strangler. I will keep on the look out for it. Of course I adore him as Dr. Praetorius in "The Bride of Frankenstein" and anything else he is in. I just love to hear him talk.

Whenever "The Old Dark House" is mentioned, I must say:

"Have a potato."

297LolaWalser
oct. 30, 2015, 5:23pm

Ha!

Yes, the days when people had FACES. I miss the FACES.

298alaudacorax
oct. 31, 2015, 6:56am

>297 LolaWalser:

O ... kay - you just sent me right back to my childhood/early teens, watching Fiend Without a Face ...

299alaudacorax
oct. 31, 2015, 7:13am

>297 LolaWalser:, >298 alaudacorax:

My mistake - looking online I realise I was thinking of Eyes Without a Face ...

300alaudacorax
oct. 31, 2015, 7:19am

Now I've got this image of Lola running through dark, cobwebby passageways - "No faces! They have no faces!!!"

301LolaWalser
nov. 1, 2015, 5:39pm

Ha! That's me any time I happen to glimpse some American sitcom with those bland, blank California pod-people.

302alaudacorax
Editat: abr. 2, 2016, 8:28am

Aquest missatge ha estat suprimit pel seu autor.

303alaudacorax
Editat: abr. 25, 2016, 5:13am

Aquest missatge ha estat suprimit pel seu autor.
En/na Gothic films (2) ha continuat aquest tema.