2013 Booker longlist: A Tale for the Time Being by Ruth Ozeki

ConversesBooker Prize

Afegeix-te a LibraryThing per participar.

2013 Booker longlist: A Tale for the Time Being by Ruth Ozeki

Aquest tema està marcat com "inactiu": L'últim missatge és de fa més de 90 dies. Podeu revifar-lo enviant una resposta.

jul. 23, 2013, 1:39pm

This thread is for discussion of A Tale for the Time Being by Ruth Ozeki.

Editat: jul. 30, 2013, 12:39am

My review:

'A time being is someone who lives in time, and that means you, and me, and every one of us who is, or was, or ever will be.'

With that definition on the first page and the fact that A Tale for the Time Being ends with six appendices (on subjects as diverse as quantum physics, Schrodinger's cat, Japanese temple names, and Zen Buddhism) as well as a bibliography and a glossary of Japanese phrases, it's clear from the start that this is a book which takes itself seriously, one where the reader is expected to do some work. And this worked for me at the start of the book, but as I read more and more I got the feeling that perhaps the author was trying a little too hard?

Ruth, an American writer of Japanese descent, is walking along the beach near her home on a remote island in British Columbia, when she discovers a well-wrapped package containing the diary of Nao(ko) Yasutani, a Japanese teenager living in Tokyo, as well as other letters. As Ruth reads the diary she becomes more and more concerned about Nao's fate, not only because she assumes that the diary has been swept into the sea by the 2011 tsunami, but also because the diary reveals that Nao plans to commit suicide. Brought up in Silicon Valley, she is facing severe bullying in her new school in Tokyo, where her parents have returned to live after her father lost his job. And so the story continues, alternating between Ruth's life with her husband, a life which to someone from New York City seems sometimes to belong to someone else, and Nao's story in Tokyo. And as Nao tells her own story she also tells the story of her great-grandmother, still alive and well at the age of 104, who was an early feminist and writer in pre-war Japan, and then became a nun after the death of her son in a kamikaze mission in World War II.

When the two strands of the narrative remained separate I had my hopes for this book, but as they begin to come together in the second half I was left with a growing feeling of disatisfaction. The book did not gel into the harmonious whole that I had hoped: rather as the mixture of ideas within the book seemed to be more and more disconnected from each other. So in the end a book with some excellent ideas, but whose execution, for me at any rate, does not wrap them into a coherent whole.

jul. 30, 2013, 1:14pm

Rhian, I haven't been able yet to put my feelings about this book into words. Your review perfectly expresses my thoughts. I was so fascinated with the beginning and thought the book might steer into 5 star direction, but when the 2 storythreads moved closer to each other, something got lost.
Still, the book gave me many new ideas and I liked it a lot, but as you said, it didn't feel coherent in the end.

ag. 3, 2013, 5:08pm

I "read" this book in audio version- listening to it as I drove back and forth visiting my mother in a nursing home. I think part of the pleasure for me is the context of my life-- searching to hold onto a relationship which will soon become memory-- reaching through time to hold onto and learn more from a wise and loved mother while I still have her. I sympathized with Ruth's grief over her mother- a small sideline of the book-- but one that resonated with me.

I have recently read Wave by Sonali Deraniyagala- a memoire of a woman who lost everything in the 2004 Tsunami-- and perhaps the enormity of her story colored my interpretation of this book as well

I was very taken with the book's premises - the convergence of flotsam and jetsam; the physical and also symbolic realities of the book, the watch, and the transplanted life; the blend of suspense and the reveal; the cultural explanations and the two viewpoints... like other commentators- I found the ending lacking- but I fail to come up with a better idea myself.

ag. 9, 2013, 12:47am

I wonder how much our experiences differ from the delivery format. I read the book (using my eyes) and feel like I could have let the book wash over me had I listened to it whilst driving. I am thinking about the book fondly now, even though I disliked reading it. Talk about conflicted!

The premise grabbed me also, the experience of reading it I was less than impressed with though.

Editat: ag. 16, 2013, 1:46am

I had the same experience. . . The premise of the story was really interesting, but I was often bored with the story itself. Not sure why, exactly. I was interested in the flotsam/jetsam information and appalled to think there may actually be that kind of debris fields on the ocean. . . Need to do some research!

set. 7, 2013, 2:06am

I wasn't a bit bored with it. I was fascinated. My only problem with the book was when the magical realism kicked in with the pages in the diary going blank and then coming back.

set. 12, 2013, 10:43pm

I'd also listened to the audiobook version of this book and enjoyed it very much. I thought that Ozeki did a great job of depicting the youthful naivete of Nao as well as her underlying sadness. My only complaint about the book is that I felt the author was trying to cover too much ground, exploring bullying, suicide, Buddhism, and then quantum physics on top of all that.

set. 19, 2013, 7:16am

I loved this book! I think Ozeki uses magical realism to reflect a deeper meaning into her narrative. It is her gentle humanity that I admire most. It seems many readers are dismayed by the use of magical realism. Here is a quote I found recently on a web sit by Ed Batista, "William Coleridge coined the phrase "suspension of disbelief" in 1817 to describe a state of mind in which readers would willingly ignore obvious untruths and fantastic elements in literature to allow themselves to enjoy the story. He called it a form of "poetic faith."

oct. 12, 2015, 5:56pm

I just finished this and mostly I liked it a lot. Definitely recommended.

oct. 12, 2015, 7:08pm

I wish that I had remembered that this thread was here before our book group discussed the book.

>9 tobiejonzarelli:
I think Ozeki uses magical realism to reflect a deeper meaning into her narrative.
I agree, and I think that she failed. I didn't like it when the magical realism was introduced, but I saw that she was trying to do something, so I was willing to pay attention. She did not achieve either a conclusion or an expectant or mysterious openness at the end. After all, I do not recommend the book, but I don't know that that is real criticism. I think the fact that she didn't make good use of quantum physics or very good use of Zen reality is real criticism. Her achievement with Zen was creditable, but with the perception of a failed book it becomes unimportant.