IniciGrupsConversesMésTendències
Cerca al lloc
Aquest lloc utilitza galetes per a oferir els nostres serveis, millorar el desenvolupament, per a anàlisis i (si no has iniciat la sessió) per a publicitat. Utilitzant LibraryThing acceptes que has llegit i entès els nostres Termes de servei i política de privacitat. L'ús que facis del lloc i dels seus serveis està subjecte a aquestes polítiques i termes.
Hide this

Resultats de Google Books

Clica una miniatura per anar a Google Books.

The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are…
S'està carregant…

The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion (2012 original; edició 2013)

de By (author) Jonathan Haidt (Autor)

MembresRessenyesPopularitatValoració mitjanaMencions
2,090555,617 (4.06)73
A groundbreaking investigation into the origins of morality, which turns out to be the basis for religion and politics. The book explains the American culture wars and refutes the "New Atheists."
Membre:mahimm
Títol:The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion
Autors:By (author) Jonathan Haidt (Autor)
Informació:Penguin Books (2013), Edition: Reprint, 528 pages
Col·leccions:La teva biblioteca
Valoració:
Etiquetes:No n'hi ha cap

Detalls de l'obra

The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion de Jonathan Haidt (2012)

S'està carregant…

Apunta't a LibraryThing per saber si aquest llibre et pot agradar.

No hi ha cap discussió a Converses sobre aquesta obra.

» Mira també 73 mencions

Es mostren 1-5 de 55 (següent | mostra-les totes)
Get to know the other side

This book has been a fantastic way to learn how to not only understand the other side but speak the same language. A world tour on moral psychology, Haidt makes it accessible. ( )
  SeekingApatheia | Apr 13, 2021 |
I believe Jonathan Haidt has done something here that is truly remarkable. In the pursuit of wisdom, he has been able to suspend judgment long enough not only to listen empathetically but to learn from those he disagrees with. With the constant reinforcement of polarization in the media, this is becoming more and more and lost art. In the process, he offers a framework for understanding our religious and political divisions that has already helped me listen better and empathize more with others. You likely will disagree with him on certain points, but few other places will you find someone who listens and empathizes like he has.

This will be a book I read again soon and will probably purchase.

Ps. I was hesitant to read it since I had heard the 6 moral foundations framework before from others and in his TED talk (which is worth a look). However, The Righteous Mind is really three shorter books and the moral foundations part is just the middle third. In other words, there's much more here than I had heard in the summaries. I hope to give a fuller review after my second reading... ( )
  nrt43 | Dec 29, 2020 |
Listened to the first two hours. Lots of pop-sci references, with a heavy focus on self-promotion of studies that the author himself published. Parts of the beginning that discussed morality more from a philosophical point of view were at times enjoyable.

Haidt ends the second chapter with the promise that he would focus more on logic/reason rather than emotion/intuition. Then, the very next chapter starts with him describing a study utilizing hypnosis that had some "interesting results." Honestly, the juxtaposition of those two was so incongruous that at first I thought it might have been provided as an example of poor science. But I was wrong, and Haidt goes on to use the study to further a thesis.

Not recommended. ( )
  rsanek | Dec 26, 2020 |
I'm familiar with Haidts vocal call for more political diversity in social science and listened to some of his talks, which is why I really wanted to read this book for a long time. In the end I wasn't disappointed. Haidt makes a good case for his moral foundations model and made me update on the evolutionary genesis (and usefulness) of religion as he heavily criticises the theories of Dawkins on this topic. Furthermore I was able to gain a better understanding of the discourse on group selection and why everybody hates it, though Haidt prepares a really good defense. Overall I feel much more informed on the nature of human morals and its shaping through the process of evolution than before. Just two minor criticisms: Haidt manages to almost completely evade the topic of kin selection, which is quite sad as I was really curious how he would analyse its importance for our morality. Furthermore I really missed something on differential moral developments based on gene-culture-coevolution for different cultures, but I understand that something like this would have been suicidal to his reputation, career and the general reception of his book. Therefore: Still 5 stars. ( )
  aeqk | Dec 13, 2020 |
Eye opening, very insightful and well worth the read. It will help me talk to people with different political views in a way that hopefully opens doors. ( )
  GretchenCollins | Dec 10, 2020 |
Es mostren 1-5 de 55 (següent | mostra-les totes)
Sense ressenyes | afegeix-hi una ressenya
Has d'iniciar sessió per poder modificar les dades del coneixement compartit.
Si et cal més ajuda, mira la pàgina d'ajuda del coneixement compartit.
Títol normalitzat
Títol original
Títols alternatius
Data original de publicació
Gent/Personatges
Informació del coneixement compartit en anglès. Modifica-la per localitzar-la a la teva llengua.
Llocs importants
Informació del coneixement compartit en anglès. Modifica-la per localitzar-la a la teva llengua.
Esdeveniments importants
Pel·lícules relacionades
Premis i honors
Informació del coneixement compartit en rus. Modifica-la per localitzar-la a la teva llengua.
Epígraf
Dedicatòria
Primeres paraules
Citacions
Informació del coneixement compartit en anglès. Modifica-la per localitzar-la a la teva llengua.
I could not understand how any thinking person would voluntarily embrace the party of evil, and so I and my fellow liberals looked for psychological explanations for conservatism, but not for liberalism.
In psychology, theories are cheap.
Libertarians are basically liberals who love markets and lack bleeding hearts.
When libertarians talk about the miracle of "spontaneous order" that emerges when people are allowed to make their own choices, the rest of us should listen.
Emphasizing differences makes many people more racist, not less.
Darreres paraules
Nota de desambiguació
Editor de l'editorial
Creadors de notes promocionals a la coberta
Informació del coneixement compartit en anglès. Modifica-la per localitzar-la a la teva llengua.
Llengua original
CDD/SMD canònics
A groundbreaking investigation into the origins of morality, which turns out to be the basis for religion and politics. The book explains the American culture wars and refutes the "New Atheists."

No s'han trobat descripcions de biblioteca.

Descripció del llibre
Sumari haiku

Dreceres

Cobertes populars

Valoració

Mitjana: (4.06)
0.5
1 2
1.5
2 17
2.5 3
3 39
3.5 10
4 129
4.5 22
5 97

Ets tu?

Fes-te Autor del LibraryThing.

 

Quant a | Contacte | LibraryThing.com | Privadesa/Condicions | Ajuda/PMF | Blog | Botiga | APIs | TinyCat | Biblioteques llegades | Crítics Matiners | Coneixement comú | 157,083,202 llibres! | Barra superior: Sempre visible