I wanted to like this book so much, but I just didn't. It was so dry and boring, even the lovely illustrations couldn't save it. Rev Gilbert White's nature journal entries were in a couple of anthologies that I read, and these little snippets were delightful. My hopes that his famous book would be as good were dashed. ( )

With wood engravings by Claire Oldham ( )

"The standard edition by E. T. Bennet, thoroughly revised with additional notes by James Edmund Harting. With ten letters not included in any other edition." ( )

What a beautiful book with the tiny white birds rendered on a soft sweet cover!

THREE Stars for the Good Writing and FIVE Stars for the illustrations by Richard Mabey!

It is hard to read how callously he shoots, kills and collects birds as "specimens."

As well, his defense of sportsmen shooting birds and animals simply as targets
and his refusal to condemn boys for cruelly killing birds in mouse traps
contrast jarringly with his sympathy and love for bird songs and for Timothy Turtle.

Makes great points about Earthworms vital to soil life and beautiful descriptions of swifts.
If only he had not interfered with the baby swifts. ( )

Fascinating book - not so much for the natural history as for the look at the history of science. The word "fossil", for instance, clearly didn't mean to White what it means today - he talks about determining the type of a piece of fossil wood by seeing how it burns. In another spot, he's talking about fossil shells found in various places, and mentions particularly one which seemed made of the stone of the quarry in which it was found - in other words, a fossil in modern terms. Which means all the others weren't... There are also things which point up how much we take for granted - what's known, as basic axioms familiar to any child, that White simply didn't know. He seriously considers - not accepts as fact, but considers as a real possibility - that swallows might hibernate underwater in England. He very properly deduces, from them appearing on an occasional early warm day and then disappearing again if the weather goes back to cold, that they must hibernate rather than migrate; but it's a reasonable proposition, to him, that they might do so underwater, since no one has so far found exactly where or how they hibernate. Now, to us, that sounds silly - birds can't breathe underwater - but with the knowledge of the natural world held by this intelligent, observant, perceptive, educated man it was a reasonable possibility. It's a fascinating glimpse into a world that's very difficult to envision nowadays. I'm very glad I read the book, and I want to compare it to some books I have about the history of science - not written at the time, but more modern reviews of the development of modern understanding.
The illustrations by Nash are sweet, but it's annoying that when White specifically describes a drawing he did, it's not included. I suppose the drawings have gotten lost in the intervening years. Also, I spent quite a bit of time wincing over the casual killing of wildlife, and some comments on how a bit of woodland would be far more "useful" if all the "inducements to sporting life" (like game birds and deer) were removed, so workers wouldn't be distracted by wanting to go kill them. It really was a different view of the world. The most avid of hunters, or collectors, these days would be more restrained in their take than White and the people around him. ( )