Clica una miniatura per anar a Google Books.
S'està carregant… Selected Letters, 1796-1817 (Oxford Paperbacks)de Jane Austen
S'està carregant…
Apunta't a LibraryThing per saber si aquest llibre et pot agradar. No hi ha cap discussió a Converses sobre aquesta obra. Jane Austen scholars and superfans will enjoy this collection of letters written by the noted author to family and friends. She discusses a multitude of things from the local gossip to gardening to her books. Two letters written during her final illness appear at the end along with a letter written by Jane's sister Cassandra to one of Jane's frequent correspondents. As with most collections of this nature, some letters appeal more than others. Scholars will find this more useful than casual readers as they seek to support points in their own Austen research. I got about 2/3 of the way through this (1985 edition) years ago and then put it down and forgot about it for some reason. I have absolutely no idea why, because Jane Austen's letters are extremely entertaining. Mostly consisting of the minutiae of daily family life written to travelling/at home relatives (particularly her sister Cassandra and her niece Fanny), but (particularly latterly) also with tantalising glimpses of her thoughts on her books (her books were her children, she loved Lizzie Bennet, thought P&P better than MP, knew exactly what Mrs Bingley would look like and the reason why she couldn't find a decent portrait of Mrs Darcy etc). I will definitely have to find a full collection at some point. What is interesting about this edition is that it was originally published in 1955 and it is clear to me that attitudes have changed considerably in this time. The introduction is interesting, but (largely) presents a common view of a completely different image of Jane Austen to that in my mind. R. W. Chapman feels the need to defend Jane Austen as when the letters were originally published, they caused uproar: "The letters transgressed against the received notions of what a great writer's letters were like; more particularly, they were not what 'gentle Jane's' letters should have been like." He goes on to defend this (her acerbic wit and the fact that these were not letters written for publication, unlike those of eg Scott, which definitely were) well, but at the same time with this image of a "gentle Jane" in mind. What I can't understand is how anyone who has read Pride and Prejudice could possibly think of Jane Austen as "gentle". She was clearly a very intelligent, sharp woman - not unkind, but with a wicked sense of humour - and I'm very glad this is the case, or she really would be just "chick-lit" as some people (completely erroneously to my mind) try to describe her. There are, oh, so many things I'd like to quote, but the one thing that I will is this (in response to her niece, who had made someone read her Aunt's books and he didn't like them): "Do not oblige him to read any more. Have mercy on him, tell him the truth & make him an apology. He & I should not in the least agree of course, in our ideas of Novels and Heroines; pictures of perfection as you know make me sick & wicked - but there is some very good sense in what he says, & I particularly respect him for wishing to think well of all young Ladies; it shews an amiable & a delicate mind" I'm so glad I read this! I have read Jane Austen more often than any other author, (bar Diana Wynne Jones) and her letters truly do bring her more to life (while at the same time supporting my idea that her personality seems to shine through everything she's written) - what a shame (and yet how completely understandable) that Cassandra burnt so many (and all of the more personal ones). One big nit-pick I have with this collection is the notes, which are abysmal - very few and far between and seemingly completely randomly picked - one apparently obscure thing will be explained, while another will not. I think this edition could seriously do with updating!* *ETA: and am glad to see from the other review that it has been! Sense ressenyes | afegeix-hi una ressenya
'Little Matters they are to be sure, but highly important.'Letter-writing was something of an addiction for young women of Jane Austen's time and social position, and Austen's letters have a freedom and familiarity that only intimate writing can convey. Wiser than her critics, who were disappointed that her correspondence dwelt on gossip and the minutiaeof everyday living, Austen understood the importance of 'Little Matters', of the emotional and material details of individual lives shared with friends and family through the medium of the letter. Ironic, acerbic, always entertaining, Jane Austen's letters are a fascinating record not only of herown day-to-day existence, but of the pleasures and frustrations experienced by women of her social class which are so central to her novels.Vivien Jones's selection includes very nearly two-thirds of Austen's surviving correspondence, and her lively introduction and notes set the novelist's most private writings in their wider cultural context. No s'han trobat descripcions de biblioteca. |
Debats actualsCapCobertes populars
Google Books — S'està carregant… GèneresClassificació Decimal de Dewey (DDC)823.7Literature English & Old English literatures English fiction Early 19th century 1800-37LCC (Clas. Bibl. Congrés EUA)ValoracióMitjana:
Ets tu?Fes-te Autor del LibraryThing. |
It is fully the OUP edition is titled "Selected Letters" because not that many are left out. Of 161 letters, 97 are included in this selection. 95 of the 161 letters were addressed to her sister Cassandra Austen. Two years ago, I tremendously enjoyed reading Selected letters of Charlotte Brontë. Those letters, carefully selected, gave a succinct and fine impression of Charlotte Brontë's life and development as a writer. But Jane Austen's letters offer none of that. They are gossipy and chatty, as probably there was no need for the two sisters to explain of clarify to each other, they being so familiar. So there is a lot to read, but you don't get any wiser about Jane Austen.
Bottomline: I wouldn't recommend reading them. ( )