Clica una miniatura per anar a Google Books.
S'està carregant… Waterlogic (edició 1994)de Edward De Bono (Autor)
Informació de l'obraWaterlogic de Edward de Bono
Cap S'està carregant…
Apunta't a LibraryThing per saber si aquest llibre et pot agradar. No hi ha cap discussió a Converses sobre aquesta obra. Sense ressenyes | afegeix-hi una ressenya
When approaching a complex problem, it is often difficult to keep in mind the many factors involved and to retain a clear view of how they relate to one another. Edward de Bono has built his reputation on providing thinking tools that are very simple to use and yet are powerful in their effect. In this book he puts forward a new method for problem-solving. De Bono contends that traditional logic is static, based on the solid foundations of 'is' and identity. In contrast to this traditional 'rock logic', he proposes 'water logic' which is based on 'to' and the flow of the mind: "What does this lead to?' as opposed to 'What is ...?' This new logic is surprisingly easy to learn and to use, and results in a visual 'flowscape', which allows you to lay out and then look at your thinking. No s'han trobat descripcions de biblioteca. |
Debats actualsCapCobertes populars
Google Books — S'està carregant… GèneresClassificació Decimal de Dewey (DDC)160Philosophy and Psychology Logic LogicLCC (Clas. Bibl. Congrés EUA)ValoracióMitjana:
Ets tu?Fes-te Autor del LibraryThing. |
The premise of the book is that there is another type of logic, other than the standard formal logic (which the author insists on calling "rock logic" throughout the book), and this other type is "Water Logic". Water logic doesn't involve the use of logic, instead it requires us to do a sort of brain storm, to connect up the associated concepts, and then decide what "flows" where. This is meant to help us locate where the problems are, which concepts are important, and what needs to be changed. So, he provides us with a system of doing all this, and it isn't a terribly bad system, I can imagine it working. But, I think most people would be able to work out the sort problems that this system is suited to, without using the system, and the book does have the dubious air of a gimmick about it.
Also, this system could not do anything that normal logic could not do, provided the user had a good mind, but it does give an idiot proof way in which people who are not that clever could formulate and go about solving problems. It doesn't hurt to have different ways of thinking about things, and this book is not worthless, I just would not recommend it as highly as the other book from this author that I have read. ( )