IniciGrupsConversesMésTendències
Cerca al lloc
Aquest lloc utilitza galetes per a oferir els nostres serveis, millorar el desenvolupament, per a anàlisis i (si no has iniciat la sessió) per a publicitat. Utilitzant LibraryThing acceptes que has llegit i entès els nostres Termes de servei i política de privacitat. L'ús que facis del lloc i dels seus serveis està subjecte a aquestes polítiques i termes.

Resultats de Google Books

Clica una miniatura per anar a Google Books.

S'està carregant…

Understand (1991)

de Ted Chiang

MembresRessenyesPopularitatValoració mitjanaMencions
332727,058 (4.19)2
Cap
S'està carregant…

Apunta't a LibraryThing per saber si aquest llibre et pot agradar.

No hi ha cap discussió a Converses sobre aquesta obra.

» Mira també 2 mencions

Es mostren totes 2
I am seriously in two minds about this novelette. I definitely enjoyed it and was absolutely willing to suspend belief until the end, which was just too much and too much of a mess for me to really appreciate it, and part of me couldn't help laughing at and being taken out of the internal logic of the story by the story.

Before The Dark Fields and Limitless, before Lucy, Chiang published Understand in Asimov magazine in 1991, a decade before the 'we only use 10% of our brain' craze, which this story manages to not posit. In a vague, relatively near future man effectively dies and experiences life-ending brain damage after drowning following some kind of accident. He is revived with sci-fi medicine that supercharges the neural pathways it fixes. This leads to him becoming addicted to becoming more bigger brained and going on the run. It culminates in a biggest brain off confrontation.

Something that struck me when reading this is that the protagonist becomes a solopsistic demigod a la Dr Manhattan, rather than the bougie neo liberal capitalist mogul and politician like the Limitless protagonist, so this is a much less depressing story.

Look, I love the ideas and the thought experiment nature of this stories and its ilk. It just didn't do as much for me as I wanted.

***Spoilers and possibly too pernickety criticism below***

I fucking hate CinemaSins and the MatPat school of interacting with art, so it is not my intention to do that, but if I am, I welcome to be called on this.

The story opens with our protagonist having a nightmare about the accident and drowning that lead to his injuries. I think it's really funny that noone ever considers this to be the result of anything, but neuron damage and repair. Does mental/ emotional trauma not exist in this world? #JustC-PTSDReaderThings

A minor nitpick is that there are some huge leaps of logic and unknown information about how the CIA works, before he does research that would make so much more sense with just an additional line. This really isn't a big deal.

When his stocks plummet and he realises there must be another big brain out there, he, and Chiang, never doubt for a single second that this other big brain boi could be anything other than a big brain boy. Feminism had been around for a while in 1991, Ursula K Le Guin had been publishing some of the finest sci-fi and fantasy for like 30 years at this point, Octavia E. Butler for about 20 years. It was another time, but, like, it really wasn't and that's no excuse.

The final confrontation is conceptually brilliant. But I found it an absolute mess and really boring. I describe it to my partner and they instantly responded by saying the protagonist loses the Game. Also, yes, brains are meat computers to a certain extent and I am happy to go with all sorts of whacky made up brain science. I'm even OK with the whole 'we only use 10% of our brains' as a fictional premise. I can get on board with sending brainwaves and signals to fuck up each other's brains like this is Scanners, but more nerdy. I can even get on board with the setting of restore points, parameters, and neural rebuilding because the brainpower is over 9000 or whatever. But the idea of running a sandboxed simulation of your mind over your mind, even though it is echoing the way the protagonist gets the doctor's password earlier in the story, was just too much for my autistic brain to handle. I can't stand the Big Bang Theory, but all I could picture was Sheldon and Leonard doing the Scanners thing at each other, while the meme equations played out over the screen. The end felt like the impression I have been given of Infinite Jest.

Look, I know that so many of my references and issues come from reading this story in 2023, being an SJW from the Alphabet Mafia, and being very autistic. I'm not saying this story I'd bad or wrong or stupid or whatever. It's kinda brilliant. Its flaws and my own issues with it just had too much of an effect on me to be able to truly enjoy this. And that's on me as much as Chiang. ( )
  RatGrrrl | Dec 20, 2023 |
A story of intelligence enhancement far more frightening than Flowers for Algernon ( )
  aulsmith | Mar 1, 2013 |
Es mostren totes 2
Sense ressenyes | afegeix-hi una ressenya
Has d'iniciar sessió per poder modificar les dades del coneixement compartit.
Si et cal més ajuda, mira la pàgina d'ajuda del coneixement compartit.
Títol normalitzat
Informació del coneixement compartit en anglès. Modifica-la per localitzar-la a la teva llengua.
Títol original
Títols alternatius
Data original de publicació
Gent/Personatges
Llocs importants
Informació del coneixement compartit en italià. Modifica-la per localitzar-la a la teva llengua.
Esdeveniments importants
Pel·lícules relacionades
Epígraf
Dedicatòria
Primeres paraules
Citacions
Darreres paraules
Nota de desambiguació
Editor de l'editorial
Creadors de notes promocionals a la coberta
Llengua original
Informació del coneixement compartit en anglès. Modifica-la per localitzar-la a la teva llengua.
CDD/SMD canònics
LCC canònic

Referències a aquesta obra en fonts externes.

Wikipedia en anglès

Cap

No s'han trobat descripcions de biblioteca.

Descripció del llibre
Sumari haiku

Debats actuals

Cap

Cobertes populars

Cap

Dreceres

Valoració

Mitjana: (4.19)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 3
3.5
4 7
4.5 3
5 5

Ets tu?

Fes-te Autor del LibraryThing.

 

Quant a | Contacte | LibraryThing.com | Privadesa/Condicions | Ajuda/PMF | Blog | Botiga | APIs | TinyCat | Biblioteques llegades | Crítics Matiners | Coneixement comú | 203,232,919 llibres! | Barra superior: Sempre visible