

S'està carregant… Investigació sobre l'enteniment humà (1748)de David Hume
![]() » 5 més No hi ha cap discussió a Converses sobre aquesta obra. Considere-se algumas citações de Hume: “Nunca devemos repousar a menor confiança no testemunho humano”, ou “é um milagre que um morto volte à vida porque isso nunca foi observado em nenhuma era ou país.¨ Hume sempre aparece quando no diálogo sobre o entendimento humano há desentendimento entre cristãos e ateus. Seu nome pode nem aparecer na conversa, mas a sua prova comprobatória parece estar implícita. E qual seria a prova segundo Hume? A negação absoluta de milagres e até de milagres atestados por testemunhas. Mas nem o próprio Hume passaria no teste, se seus critérios fossem aplicados a si mesmo, porque ninguém pode dar 100% de provas, seja ateu seja cristão. Ao questionar milagres como a história da ressurreição de Cristo, não é necessário termos 100% de provas. Então, por que ateus parecem adorar Hume? Creio que alguns simplesmente não têm evidências para corroborar o seu ponto de vista quanto à não-existência de Deus. Mas muitos rejeitam o cristianismo por não quererem-se submeter. Hume diz que nossas idéias gerais não têm valor cognitivo porque são apenas aglomerados fortuitos de sensações corporais. Em nenhum instante ele se dá conta de que a filosofia de Hume, compondo-se ela própria de idéias gerais assim formadas, também não pode valer grande coisa. Quando um ateu forma opinião por causa formada por causa da evidência humeana, já deixou de ser ateu para ¨adorar¨ o divino filósofo. ( ![]() ملخص موجز لفلسفة هيوم المبنية على التجريب العملي والشك، وهو أكثر النصوص تأثيراً في الفترة المبكرة للفلسفة الحديثة. في الدعوة إلى استخدام العقل في رفض خرافات الفلسفة الماورائية والدين، ساعد هذا النص في تقديم الأساس الفلسفي للمنهج العلمي الذي برز بعد ذلك في عصر التنوير الأوروبي. سجلت بعض الأفكار أثناء القراءة لأكتبها قريباً في مراجعة أطول، فالكتاب يستحق ذلك. هو أول عمل أقرأه لهيوم وقد أعجبني كثيراً يُتبع... I am uncertain about the implications of these ideas, but Hume is convincing, presents them well. After his three-volume Treatise of Human Nature dropped like a rock to the bottom of the pool of British philosophic writing, Hume set out to write a briefer, more accessible version -- the Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. One of the early points it makes is that most endeavors to write about the nature of thought are hopeless and nearly impossible to understand. With that disclaimer, Hume sets out to contradict himself by writing lucidly about, while candidly acknowledging the severe limits of, this topic. He uses logic to show that most human understanding falls into two categories: a very small group of innate truths deducible by logic, like every triangle has three sides, and a much larger group -- nearly everything we "know" -- which is based on reality-based observation. This latter group always has, at a fundamental level, an element of probabilistic assumption: Things customarily happened this way before, so they probably will again. Thus almost everything we (think we) know about the world is based on empirical experience, not pure logic. So . . .how did he figure this all out? Worth re-reading every so often. Sense ressenyes | afegeix-hi una ressenya
Pertany a aquestes col·leccions editorialsContingut aThe Empiricists : Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (Abridged) ; Berkeley, Principles of Human Knowledge, and 3 Dialogues ; Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, and Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion de Richard Taylor English Philosophers of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: Locke; Berkeley; Hume de Charles William Eliot The Harvard Classics 50 Volume Set de Charles William Eliot (indirecte) Harvard Classics Complete Set w/ Lectures and Guide [52 Volumes] de Charles William Eliot (indirecte) Harvard Classics Five Foot Shelf of Books & Shelf of Fiction 71 Volumes including Lecture Series de Charles William Eliot (indirecte) Abreujat a
Published in 1748, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding is Scottish empiricist philosopher David Hume's distillation of his mature philosophy. Addressing themes including the limits of human understanding, the compatibility of free will with determinism, weaknesses in the foundations of religion, and the appeal of skepticism, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding is Hume's attempt to revise and clarify the ideas of his earlier A Treatise of Human Nature. A major work in the empiricist school of thought that included John Locke and George Berkeley, Hume's work influenced such later authors as Adam Smith, Immanuel Kant, and Jeremy Bentham. Controversial and widely debated since its publication, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding is a classic of empiricist philosophy whose questions remain as relevant today as ever. No s'han trobat descripcions de biblioteca. |
Cobertes populars
![]() GèneresClassificació Decimal de Dewey (DDC)121 — Philosophy and Psychology Philosophy Of Humanity EpistemologyLCC (Clas. Bibl. Congrés EUA)ValoracióMitjana:![]()
Ets tu?Fes-te Autor del LibraryThing.
|