A fantastically researched and well written history of the Roman triumph, including a discussion of its potential origins, as well as its development throughout the early republican through the imperial era. This book is both thorough and compelling. Just as interesting as the discussion of the actual triumphs is the analysis of the available evidence, or often the lack thereof.

Recommend. ( )

The very concept of a Roman triumph is evocative; Hollywood (or HBO) have tackled it with abandon and deep pockets, militaristic rulers have aped it with gusto.
The challenge in pinpointing its form is that the sources are varied (from literature to art) and in disagreement over what happened, how and why.
Beard's approach is both readable and transparent in examining the undertow of academic debate. This may leave some readers unsatistied as there are no straightforward answers delivered, but I found it refreshing to see the complexities of the evidence meshed with a reasonable discussion of what may have occured.
There is an interesting current running through the work where Beard suggests that the triumph may not have been the glorious military display we assume it is, but instead sought to remind society that glory was fleeting and conquering achievements not all that. I'm not entirely convinced by the arguments, but it does raise some very interesting points.
Unlike most academic texts, Beard goes from the specific (Pompey's triumph following his victories in the east) to the general (origins in and impact on society).
She then examines the nitty-gritty (the route of the triumph, the changing format, the artistic, architectural and numismatic evidence) before rounding on the academic debate.
This represents an accesible, even-handed and pretty comprehensive examination of this fascinating cultural, political and religious ritual. ( )

Mary Beard realiza un estudio profundo sobre la ceremonia del triunfo, sus orígenes, su desarrollo desde los primeros años de la República hasta la época de Justiniano en Bizancio, sus características y las dudas que se plantean en relación a la institución. En la obra muestra una gran erudición y capacidad con gran profusión de citas. En algunas ocasiones se observa una cierta prepotencia de la autora en su intención de desmitificar la institución triunfal, hasta el punto de llegar a no reconocer validez a textos de la época sin mayores razones, mientras que otros textos de la misma naturaleza son elevados por ella a textos seguros y veraces.. Absolutamente inmejorable el capítulo referido a la puerta triunfal y a la procesión de los cautivos. Lo peor, la voluntad paternalista y moralizante de la autora en decirnos que el triunfo es una institución que exalta el militarismo (como no podía ser de otra manera en la sociedad romana) y, por lo tanto,es mala; este tipo de reflexiones están de más en un ensayo histórico. ( )