

S'està carregant… Breakfast of Champions (1973 original; edició 2000)de Kurt Vonnegut Jr.
Informació de l'obraEsmorzar de campions de Kurt Vonnegut (1973)
![]()
» 35 més Metafiction (24) Favourite Books (655) Books Read in 2015 (257) Readable Classics (45) Books Read in 2018 (469) 1970s (69) Books Read in 2016 (3,509) Books Read in 2013 (889) Great American Novels (106) 20th Century Literature (988) Overdue Podcast (292) Read (112) Swinging Seventies (64) Penguin Random House (46) Books Read in 2021 (451) Best Satire (62) Midwestern Books (38) Unread books (825) No hi ha cap discussió a Converses sobre aquesta obra. Wonderfully inventive and never less than fascinating. As a "gift to himself on his 50th birthday" it seemed that he ran out of steam rather than take time to finish properly. But perhaps that was part of the gift; just let it happen how it did and not worry about it. I’d read Slaughter House 5 decades ago and recall really enjoying it. I was really looking forward to reading Vonnegut again but I found Breakfast of Champions…tedious. This would’ve been a DNF, except…it was Vonnegut. Heading into this, I anticipated John Malkovich’s voice to be perfect for Vonnegut…but now am not so sure; I can’t decide if Malkovich was perfect for this…or if his voice amplified the tedium. The best part of this work when when the narrator revealed to Kilgore Trout that he was a character in a book; maybe if the book had spent more time on this. And I know humor is subjective; I didn’t find Vonnegut’s attempted humor humorous. I always forget how much I enjoy Vonnegut's writing (I'm sure that I've stated that before), even if his stories themselves are totally all over the place. As with the rest of his books, this story was really just a structure for his rambling, crazy, ideas; most of them are still hold up well even now, 40 years after publication (i.e. "West Point is a school that turns young men into homicidal maniacs"), while others haven't aged quite as well (i.e. All of the references to Black people using a certain slur.) Audiobook notes - This is the first audiobook that I've listened to that was narrated by John Malkovich, and while his narration was excellent in itself, the production was a little rough in the earlier parts - his in-breathing was very loud, as was the turning of the pages. Sense ressenyes | afegeix-hi una ressenya
Contingut aNovels & Stories, 1963-1973: Cat's Cradle / God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater / Slaughterhouse-Five / Breakfast of Champions / Stories de Kurt Vonnegut Té una guia d'estudi per a estudiants
The author questions the condition of modern man in this novel depicting a science fiction writer's struggle to find peace and sanity in the world. No s'han trobat descripcions de biblioteca. |
Cobertes populars
![]() GèneresClassificació Decimal de Dewey (DDC)813.54 — Literature English (North America) American fiction 20th Century 1945-1999LCC (Clas. Bibl. Congrés EUA)ValoracióMitjana:![]()
Ets tu?Fes-te Autor del LibraryThing. |
First and foremost, he is upfront about the two monstrous sins in America’s past, genocide and slavery, and the hypocrisy of the country never fully owning up them, yet passing itself off as a virtuous beacon of freedom. How fantastic is it that nearly 50 years ago he was casting the “discovery” of America in 1492 in a very different light, calling it “the year in which sea pirates began to cheat and rob and kill them [other human beings].” “Color was everything,” in America, he says, meaning including the present day, and “The chief weapon of the sea pirates was their capacity to astonish. Nobody else could believe, until it was much too late, how heartless and greedy they were.”
Vonnegut also comments on capitalistic greed and the country’s “every man for himself” attitude, resulting in extreme cruelty to other people and a destruction of the environment. There is a fossil fuel company called Rosewater in the book that strips the land and treats workers like animals, which reminded me of the real-world Duke Power. He points out the unfairness in the distribution of wealth, including those like Nelson Rockefeller who “owned or controlled more of the planet than many nations…his destiny since infancy.” On these points and others (racism, the patriarchy, commercialism) the book is still incredibly relevant today, which is as depressing as it is impressive.
Vonnegut also reveals a fair amount of pessimism about humanity as a whole, through his character Kilgore Trout believing that “humanity deserved to die horribly, since it had behaved so cruelly and wastefully on a planet so sweet.” He points out mankind’s inherent and dangerous tribalism when he says “Ideas on Earth were badges of friendship or enmity. Their content did not matter. Friends agreed with friends, on order to express friendliness. Enemies disagreed with friends, in order to express enmity.” He was 51 when he wrote the book, in the period of life when it does get difficult to remain sanguine about the human race.
The book starts incredibly strong, but it meanders as it plays out, and Vonnegut inserting his own illustrations often didn’t add much. However, the references to his personal life, including his mother’s suicide and his own struggles with mental health, were touching though. All in all, definitely a good read.
Just one more quote, on America:
“The undippable [American] flag was a beauty, and the anthem and the vacant motto [E pluribus unum] might not have mattered much, if it weren’t for this: a lot of citizens were so ignored and cheated and insulted that they thought they might be in the wrong country, or even on the wrong planet, that some terrible mistake had been made. It might have comforted them some if their anthem and their motto had mentioned fairness or brotherhood or hope or happiness, had somehow welcomed them to the society and its real estate.” (