IniciGrupsConversesMésTendències
Cerca al lloc
Aquest lloc utilitza galetes per a oferir els nostres serveis, millorar el desenvolupament, per a anàlisis i (si no has iniciat la sessió) per a publicitat. Utilitzant LibraryThing acceptes que has llegit i entès els nostres Termes de servei i política de privacitat. L'ús que facis del lloc i dels seus serveis està subjecte a aquestes polítiques i termes.
Hide this

Resultats de Google Books

Clica una miniatura per anar a Google Books.

Critical: What We Can Do About the…
S'està carregant…

Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis (edició 2008)

de Tom Daschle (Autor), Jeanne M. Lambrew (Narrador), Scott S. Greenberger (Narrador)

MembresRessenyesPopularitatValoració mitjanaConverses
733286,083 (3.15)No n'hi ha cap
Daschle examines the weaknesses of the health care system in the United States, arguing why previous attempts at national health coverage failed. He proposes that an independent Federal Health Board be created and that employers' plans, Medicaid and Medicare be merged with an expanded FEHBP (Federal Employee Health Benefits Program) that would cover everyone.… (més)
Membre:OHCPELibrary
Títol:Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis
Autors:Tom Daschle (Autor)
Altres autors:Jeanne M. Lambrew (Narrador), Scott S. Greenberger (Narrador)
Informació:Thomas Dunne Books (2008), Edition: 1, 240 pages
Col·leccions:La teva biblioteca
Valoració:
Etiquetes:No n'hi ha cap

Detalls de l'obra

Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis de Tom Daschle

No n'hi ha cap
S'està carregant…

Apunta't a LibraryThing per saber si aquest llibre et pot agradar.

No hi ha cap discussió a Converses sobre aquesta obra.

Es mostren totes 3
In reading Sen. Tom Daschle's book Critical on our health care system and his high level proposal for health care reform, I found some interesting concepts and quotes to pass on. Critical was published in 2008, by Daschle, a nominee to head Health and Human Services, and a long time advocate for universal health care.

First, Daschle outlines the history of health care in this country, from President Truman's time to the present. When discussing the 1993 attempt by the Clinton administration, he cites studies that showed that when told major features of the bill, 76% of people said it had "great appeal" or "some appeal". But when told it was Clinton's proposal, that number dropped to just over 50%.This is interesting, and a way that all of us should consider our political opinions. How much do we disagree with the concept, vs. the presenter of it?


"Neglect is perhaps even more damaging". This after Daschle gives case after case of the cost of health care skyrocketing and death of patients, when they ignore things and often endure great pain and hardship, because the cost is too high.

His central premise, is that Congress does not have the professional technical expertise to handle health care. In similar situations, they have handed it off to an independent body. Daschle's major proposal is to set up a Health Advisory Board, similar to the Federal Reserve Board. This Board would be nonpartisan, insulated from political pressure. It would be set up similar to the Fed, in that there would be a board of governors consisting of economic experts, technical experts, clinicians, researchers, etc, who have the expertise to make decisions. There would also be regional boards and staff of analysts.

This probably sounds like "just another government agency", but when you read the depth of Daschle's book-- and the history of the Federal Reserve Board--it makes much sense. Congress is too beholden to political pressures and special interests, to be able to make nonbiased opinions--much less laws-- about health care. They also do not have the technical expertise.

Daschle believes in universal coverage, but also believes that there are many out of control costs. He makes a strong case for how we don't use technology to our advantage. At the time of his writing, 5% of doctors offices use electronic charts, electronic prescriptions (hence reducing drug interaction issues), tranmission of electronic lab results, etc. He estimates the cost at $76 billion/year, in our $1.23 trillion/year system. Hardly earth shattering, but not chump change, either.

He also discusses how health care has become increasingly high tech-- but it is not always needed. We use very expensive diagnostic tests, when often the older equipment is just as good. This is an example of where he wants the Board to weigh in on what would be paid for. If a newer technology is not necessarily better, just newer and being pushed, then payment for the test would not be mandatory.

On a related note, doctors often do not keep up with the latest studies. They are getting their information from the salespeople who have a vested interest. Other countries have governmental agencies which provide information on new technologies. Daschle also suggests that clinical trials should not just include efficacy testing, but testing to determine which treatment is better. ( )
  PokPok | Jan 29, 2011 |
It's difficult for me to be objective about this issue.

It is not difficult for me to be pessimistic about this issue.

I truly get the feeling that the people who realize just how complicated this issue is are exceedingly rare. And this is what leads to my pessimism.

And yet, I don't question in the least that the system is broken. In fact, I often can be heard telling people just that.

And perhaps it'll take someone or some ones willfully ignoring the depth of the complexity of the situation to fashion a workable solution. Because, god knows, it certainly seems an insurmountable problem to most who pay attention to the details.

With his thin book, Daschle can't be accused of getting mired down in details. It is a superficial look at the problem. The anecdotes he trots out to illustrate his points are compelling on the surface but frustrating in their omissions. Omissions which are not obvious to most but will strike those who work in the industry.

Daschle's basic idea is that a board akin to the Federal Reserve Board should be set up to manage health care decisions, just as the Fed manages interest rate decisions. Given the current financial crisis, the suggestion that anything should be modeled after the Fed is a bit unfortunate. And yet, the reasoning behind his approach seems sound. A board of qualified individuals in position to make difficult and painful decisions, insulated from political pressures but with transparency so there is trust and buy-in.

It does seem utopian. I don't much trust utopian . . .

It's a scary time to be in the industry and to be trying to make decisions with long-term repercussions when the premises upon which those decisions must be based have their foundations in shifting sand.

I'm just going to hang on tight for a wild ride. ( )
  iammbb | Jan 6, 2009 |
Since Daschle is the newly appointed Secretary of DHHS, a reading of his recently published book is a must for any healthcare professional. Daschle gives a nice summary of failed efforts to date (you just need to set aside some mild partisan hackery that Democrats are the only good guys and competent people in this fight and how Daschle can "reach across the aisle" to Republicans interested in this topic). His overall plan, a combination of creating a Federal Health Board (similar to the creation of the Federal Reserve Board for monitary policy) as well as advocating for individual responsibility to carry health insurance, is unique but modeled after other countries as well as building on programs in Massachussets and California.

Daschle's book is a short and pleasant read and, given that he is the new leader, an essential one. ( )
  dvulcano | Nov 26, 2008 |
Es mostren totes 3
Sense ressenyes | afegeix-hi una ressenya

» Afegeix-hi altres autors

Nom de l'autorCàrrecTipus d'autorObra?Estat
Tom Daschleautor primaritotes les edicionscalculat
Greenberger, Scott S.autor secundaritotes les edicionsconfirmat
Lambrew, Jeanne M.autor secundaritotes les edicionsconfirmat
Has d'iniciar sessió per poder modificar les dades del coneixement compartit.
Si et cal més ajuda, mira la pàgina d'ajuda del coneixement compartit.
Títol normalitzat
Títol original
Títols alternatius
Data original de publicació
Gent/Personatges
Llocs importants
Esdeveniments importants
Pel·lícules relacionades
Premis i honors
Epígraf
Dedicatòria
Primeres paraules
Citacions
Darreres paraules
Nota de desambiguació
Editor de l'editorial
Creadors de notes promocionals a la coberta
Llengua original
CDD/SMD canònics

Referències a aquesta obra en fonts externes.

Wikipedia en anglès (1)

Daschle examines the weaknesses of the health care system in the United States, arguing why previous attempts at national health coverage failed. He proposes that an independent Federal Health Board be created and that employers' plans, Medicaid and Medicare be merged with an expanded FEHBP (Federal Employee Health Benefits Program) that would cover everyone.

No s'han trobat descripcions de biblioteca.

Descripció del llibre
Sumari haiku

Dreceres

Cobertes populars

Valoració

Mitjana: (3.15)
0.5
1
1.5
2 3
2.5
3 2
3.5 3
4 1
4.5
5 1

Ets tu?

Fes-te Autor del LibraryThing.

 

Quant a | Contacte | LibraryThing.com | Privadesa/Condicions | Ajuda/PMF | Blog | Botiga | APIs | TinyCat | Biblioteques llegades | Crítics Matiners | Coneixement comú | 159,056,919 llibres! | Barra superior: Sempre visible