IniciGrupsConversesMésTendències
Cerca al lloc
Aquest lloc utilitza galetes per a oferir els nostres serveis, millorar el desenvolupament, per a anàlisis i (si no has iniciat la sessió) per a publicitat. Utilitzant LibraryThing acceptes que has llegit i entès els nostres Termes de servei i política de privacitat. L'ús que facis del lloc i dels seus serveis està subjecte a aquestes polítiques i termes.

Resultats de Google Books

Clica una miniatura per anar a Google Books.

S'està carregant…

Jesus of Nazareth (2008)

de Paul Verhoeven

MembresRessenyesPopularitatValoració mitjanaConverses
1218224,160 (2.96)Cap
Building on the work of biblical scholars--Rudolph Bultmann, Raymond Brown, Jane Schaberg, and Robert Funk, among others--filmmaker Paul Verhoeven disrobes the mythical Jesus to reveal a man who has much in common with other great political leaders throughout history--human beings who believed that change was coming in their lifetimes. Gone is the Jesus of the miracles, gone the son of God, gone the weaver of arcane parables whose meanings are obscure. In their place Verhoeven gives us his vision of Jesus as a complete man, someone who was changed by events, the leader of a political movement, and, perhaps most importantly, someone who, in his speeches and sayings, introduced a new ethic in which the embrace of human contradictions transcends the mechanics of value and worth that had defined the material world before Jesus. "The Romans saw [Jesus] as an insurrectionist, what today is often called a terrorist. It is very likely there were 'wanted' posters of him on the gates of Jerusalem. He was dangerous because he was proclaiming the Kingdom of Heaven, but this wasn't the Kingdom of Heaven as we think of it now, some spectral thing in the future, up in the sky. For Jesus, the Kingdom of Heaven was a very tangible thing. Something that was already present on Earth, in the same way that Che Guevara proclaimed Marxism as the advent of world change. If you were totalitarian rulers, running an occupation like the Romans, this was troubling talk, and that was why Jesus was killed." --Paul Verhoeven, from profile by Mark Jacobson in New York Magazine… (més)
Cap
S'està carregant…

Apunta't a LibraryThing per saber si aquest llibre et pot agradar.

No hi ha cap discussió a Converses sobre aquesta obra.

This was an interesting read. I like the idea of analyzing the biblical text body from a storyteller's point of view, as well as Verhoeven's flat-out refusal to accept any of the supernatural events in it as fact. I'm regularly baffled that otherwise rational people seriously consider the possibility of a man walking on water, or turning water into wine, or reanimating the dead -- things they would never believe if they read about them in the newspaper today, but as long as they are described in that one particular book, we're suddenly in "who knows" territory. Here, those parts of the story are barely mentioned, with the author dismissing them as the rationally "impossible miracles" they are.

Ironically, Verhoeven still gives the bible far more credit as a historical source than I do, and he too sometime goes a little to much into "storyteller mode". I personally think that the historical person who lived and preached in Palestine two millenia ago had little to nothing to do with the fiction Christianity uses as its figurehead today. That too is just an opinion. If anything, Verhoeven's book is one more reminder how flimsy and fallible the one major piece of evidence that we have really is. ( )
  TomZil | Mar 5, 2022 |
Question: What happens when an accomplished film maker delves into the realm of historical Jesus scholarship?

Answer: Fresh insight.

Paul Verhoeven is the only non-theologian admitted to the Jesus Seminar, a group of scholars dedicated to uncovering the historical Jesus. While his book will not be recognized for the depth of research that goes into the books of more noted scholars, it's still an interesting read.

Verhoeven digs into the relationship between Jesus and John the Baptist, the sin of riches, exorcisms, and much more to paint Jesus in human terms. Jesus is not an ideal for Verhoeven, but a living, breathing person, with fears and failures alongside his accomplishments. Jesus is a hunted criminal who masterfully escapes the long arm of the law...until an apostate disciple masquerading as a Zealot (not likely one of the twelve, nor even named Judas, according to Verhoeven) leads the authorities to him.

After Jesus' crucifixion, his disciples believed he returned from the dead. But if the whole of the Jesus story were wrapped up in this miracle of overcoming death, Christianity could not have survived for 2,000 years. Jesus created powerful parables and devised a new code of ethics; regardless of his false understanding that the kingdom of God was imminent, he indeed transformed the world. Verhoeven closes his book with this paradox: Jesus' mistaken view of reality led to the most significant ethical revival in the past two thousand years. ( )
  DubiousDisciple | Mar 31, 2011 |
Ressenya escrita per a Crítics Matiners de LibraryThing .
At first glance, the idea that Paul Verhoeven, director of Basic Instinct, Robocop, and Starship Troopers, wrote a book on Jesus strikes one as the set-up to a particularly tasteless joke. Fortunately, Verhoeven offers the reader his perspective on the Historical Jesus in his book, Jesus of Nazareth. Trained in mathematics and a prolific filmmaker, Verhoeven has been a member of the Jesus Seminar since he moved to Los Angeles in 1985. He occupies a unique intellectual position within the Jesus Seminar due to his status as non-academic, non-theologian, and non-believer. (But belief is not a prerequisite to historical investigation as evidenced by the plethora of books about Greco-Roman mythology and Hinduism, to take two examples, written by non-believers.)

Verhoeven the Filmmaker provides opportunities for deconstruction and reconstruction of events. Having made his career directing movies for a popular audience, he has expertise in creating stories. The Gospels are similar stories, written to captivate a general audience. Because the Gospels have four separate authors and offer biases from each other, the stories present a specific set of challenges. Verhoeven explores these many challenges, putting forward his assertions. Another challenge facing historians dealing with the Classical Era includes the scant historical and archaeological evidence. In order to reconstruct the period, one must use a blend of historical data, imagination, intuition, and imagination.

Verhoeven asserts the authors of the Gospels “overpainted” certain politically explosive scenes with miraculous events. One must not forget the dangerous political scene of first century Roman Palestine. Numerous messianic figures roamed the province, speaking out against Roman tyranny and collaboration from the Herodian dynasty. Speaking out against Roman rule was not only a political crime but also a religious crime. One worshiped the same gods as one’s monarch. Those in open dissent this truism met with torture and execution. Verhoeven also asserts that Jesus used his ministry to further the plan that God’s Kingdom was imminent. This platform aroused the ire of the Pharisees, the Herodians, and the Romans. According to Jesus, all these corrupt institutions would be swept away and the Kingdom of God would re-establish itself.

The short book (only 200 pages of text in the hardcover edition) brings together Verhoeven’s reconstruction of events in the life of Jesus. On occasion, he writes how he would film certain events. These lively visual scenes supplied an otherwise dry and academic book with cinematic flourish. His understanding of a century of theological thought meshes with his take on movies made about Jesus. His takedown of Mel Gibson’s Passion of the Christ is refreshing and commonsensical in its assessment.

For anyone genuinely interested in the Historical Jesus, Verhoeven’s Jesus of Nazareth brings an outsider’s perspective and an enthusiast’s passion to this endlessly fascinating topic.

http://driftlessareareview.wordpress.com/2010/05/16/jesus-of-nazareth-by-paul-ve... ( )
1 vota kswolff | Jan 2, 2011 |
Ressenya escrita per a Crítics Matiners de LibraryThing .
Verhoeven's book is well-written and is probably a little bit more accessible than the works of many of the other authors of the Jesus Seminar, at least to the average layperson reader. However, he does not bring very much new "to the table." In addition, there are conclusions he draws and statements he make which actually rely on some older scholarship; in some cases, more recent scholarship has actually takes the dominate discussion in a very different direction. For example, Verhoeven's use of the Aramaic term "abba" to mean "daddy" has been recognized by modern textual and linguistic scholars to be an error. "Abba" is simply the Aramaic word for father; no more, and no less. Even a cursory study of modern scholarship would reveal as much.

I don't often read books on Jesus from the perspective of an atheist or agnostic, so for that I am grateful to have read this work. However, as scholarship, it falls short. ( )
  jlhilljr | Oct 14, 2010 |
Ressenya escrita per a Crítics Matiners de LibraryThing .
Not a bad book, just not very interesting or unique. For the most part, Verhoeven borrows the scholarship of others, namely those scholars contributing to the 'Jesus Seminar', in an attempt to place Jesus historically and culturally. To this end he delivers the conclusions of these scholars sufficiently, even if he doesn't adequately address their method for drawing such conclusions. Verhoeven's unique 'take' on the material seems to be his desire to treat the Gospel narratives as dramatic screenplay's, a method that leads him to imagine how he might have written it were he to be writing it as a screenplay, then assuming that the original authors were using similar narrative techniques to increase the drama and highlight the nature of Jesus' message. And this is where I think Verhoeven goes astray, by projecting his own emotional understanding of narrative back to authors living in vastly different times and cultures he makes the same methodological error that many Christian fundamentalists seem to make. I think if a person isn't familiar with modern biblical historical scholarship, this book might provide a provocative entree into the genre, but I think it will only get you so far in an attempt to understand the historical context and mindset of the gospel authors. ( )
  getdowmab | Sep 18, 2010 |
Es mostren 1-5 de 9 (següent | mostra-les totes)
Sense ressenyes | afegeix-hi una ressenya
Has d'iniciar sessió per poder modificar les dades del coneixement compartit.
Si et cal més ajuda, mira la pàgina d'ajuda del coneixement compartit.
Títol normalitzat
Informació del coneixement compartit en anglès. Modifica-la per localitzar-la a la teva llengua.
Títol original
Títols alternatius
Data original de publicació
Gent/Personatges
Llocs importants
Esdeveniments importants
Informació del coneixement compartit en anglès. Modifica-la per localitzar-la a la teva llengua.
Pel·lícules relacionades
Epígraf
Dedicatòria
Primeres paraules
Citacions
Darreres paraules
Nota de desambiguació
Editor de l'editorial
Creadors de notes promocionals a la coberta
Llengua original
CDD/SMD canònics
LCC canònic

Referències a aquesta obra en fonts externes.

Wikipedia en anglès (4)

Building on the work of biblical scholars--Rudolph Bultmann, Raymond Brown, Jane Schaberg, and Robert Funk, among others--filmmaker Paul Verhoeven disrobes the mythical Jesus to reveal a man who has much in common with other great political leaders throughout history--human beings who believed that change was coming in their lifetimes. Gone is the Jesus of the miracles, gone the son of God, gone the weaver of arcane parables whose meanings are obscure. In their place Verhoeven gives us his vision of Jesus as a complete man, someone who was changed by events, the leader of a political movement, and, perhaps most importantly, someone who, in his speeches and sayings, introduced a new ethic in which the embrace of human contradictions transcends the mechanics of value and worth that had defined the material world before Jesus. "The Romans saw [Jesus] as an insurrectionist, what today is often called a terrorist. It is very likely there were 'wanted' posters of him on the gates of Jerusalem. He was dangerous because he was proclaiming the Kingdom of Heaven, but this wasn't the Kingdom of Heaven as we think of it now, some spectral thing in the future, up in the sky. For Jesus, the Kingdom of Heaven was a very tangible thing. Something that was already present on Earth, in the same way that Che Guevara proclaimed Marxism as the advent of world change. If you were totalitarian rulers, running an occupation like the Romans, this was troubling talk, and that was why Jesus was killed." --Paul Verhoeven, from profile by Mark Jacobson in New York Magazine

No s'han trobat descripcions de biblioteca.

Descripció del llibre
Sumari haiku

Autor amb llibres seus als Crítics Matiners de LibraryThing

El llibre de Paul Verhoeven Jesus of Nazareth estava disponible a LibraryThing Early Reviewers.

Debats actuals

Cap

Cobertes populars

Dreceres

Valoració

Mitjana: (2.96)
0.5
1 4
1.5
2 4
2.5 1
3 3
3.5 1
4 9
4.5
5 1

Ets tu?

Fes-te Autor del LibraryThing.

Seven Stories Press

Seven Stories Press ha publicat 3 edicions d'aquest llibre.

Edicions: 1583229051, 160980077X, 1609803485

 

Quant a | Contacte | LibraryThing.com | Privadesa/Condicions | Ajuda/PMF | Blog | Botiga | APIs | TinyCat | Biblioteques llegades | Crítics Matiners | Coneixement comú | 203,242,888 llibres! | Barra superior: Sempre visible