IniciGrupsConversesMésTendències
Cerca al lloc
Aquest lloc utilitza galetes per a oferir els nostres serveis, millorar el desenvolupament, per a anàlisis i (si no has iniciat la sessió) per a publicitat. Utilitzant LibraryThing acceptes que has llegit i entès els nostres Termes de servei i política de privacitat. L'ús que facis del lloc i dels seus serveis està subjecte a aquestes polítiques i termes.
Hide this

Resultats de Google Books

Clica una miniatura per anar a Google Books.

S'està carregant…

Justification: God's Plan & Paul's Vision (2009)

de N. T. Wright

Altres autors: Mira la secció altres autors.

MembresRessenyesPopularitatValoració mitjanaMencions
8131320,387 (4)4
Here in one place Wright now offers a comprehensive account and defense of his perspective on this crucial doctrine. He provides a sweeping overview of the central points in the debate before launching into a thorough explanation of the key texts in Paul's writings. While fully cognizant of tradition and controversy, the final authority for his conclusions is the letters of Paul themselves. Along the way Wright responds to critics, such as John Piper, who have challenged what has come to be called the New Perspective. --from publisher description… (més)
No n'hi ha cap
S'està carregant…

Apunta't a LibraryThing per saber si aquest llibre et pot agradar.

No hi ha cap discussió a Converses sobre aquesta obra.

» Mira també 4 mencions

Es mostren 1-5 de 13 (següent | mostra-les totes)
Doctrinal Theology
  CPI | Aug 1, 2016 |
Reading N.T. Wright is sort of like reading E.B. White if E.B. White wrote theology. And who else could include 7 different punctuation marks in one sentence and still have the sentence make sense? Beyond the love that I have for Wright's writing ability, he does a wonderful job of laying out his argument for his view of justification in both Galatians and Romans, with a side jaunt through a few other books. While some may not agree with everything he says, one would be hard pressed to disagree with his desire to see biblical cohesion and the exaltation of Christ.

Beyond that, Wright gives much food for thought including a demand that believers re-read Piper and others to make sure they have adequately described his teaching. Wright does not pull any punches on how he feels he has been unfairly maligned by Piper and others, including Carson's oft quoted blurb on the jacket of Piper's book.

While Wright may not go far enough in attributing imputation to the concept of justification, he does not deny the sufficiency of Christ's death and resurrection for justification of the believer. ( )
  memlhd | Jan 23, 2016 |
Reading N.T. Wright is sort of like reading E.B. White if E.B. White wrote theology. And who else could include 7 different punctuation marks in one sentence and still have the sentence make sense? Beyond the love that I have for Wright's writing ability, he does a wonderful job of laying out his argument for his view of justification in both Galatians and Romans, with a side jaunt through a few other books. While some may not agree with everything he says, one would be hard pressed to disagree with his desire to see biblical cohesion and the exaltation of Christ.

Beyond that, Wright gives much food for thought including a demand that believers re-read Piper and others to make sure they have adequately described his teaching. Wright does not pull any punches on how he feels he has been unfairly maligned by Piper and others, including Carson's oft quoted blurb on the jacket of Piper's book.

While Wright may not go far enough in attributing imputation to the concept of justification, he does not deny the sufficiency of Christ's death and resurrection for justification of the believer. ( )
  memlhd | Jan 23, 2016 |
Read for a class. Wright's exegesis is highly selective and dubious - he (and the other proponents of the NPP) just redefine the words they don't like to arrive at their predetermined conclusion. Wright in particular completely discounts other NT books but he gives much weight to the apocrypha and Qumran texts to arrive at his "correct" understanding of 1st C. Jewish thought. ( )
  ChadS762 | Nov 14, 2012 |
This was a thought-provoking book. Although, I must say that I haven't read Piper's book that this book is in response to, therefore I missed out on a portion of the counter-arguments presented by Piper. It brings some very interesting issues related to exactly what justification and righteousness are. I hope some of this issues are fleshed out further in his book on Paul coming out in the next year or so. This book appears to be well thought out and his approach to Scripture is particularly thorough while being aware of Christian traditions with regard to the subject and passages under discussion. In the future, I believe I will need to revisit this book and look at the passages involved more closely. Luckily though this book while it did rely on a variety of passages, it largely relied on the flow of the argument and themes of the Pauline works being studied in the exegesis portion of the work. As a final note, though I did find his notes directed towards Piper especially in the first chapter or so, somewhat annoying, but these have little to do with the actual argument being made. These have little to do with the actual ideas being presented however. ( )
  aevaughn | May 4, 2011 |
Es mostren 1-5 de 13 (següent | mostra-les totes)
Sense ressenyes | afegeix-hi una ressenya

» Afegeix-hi altres autors (4 possibles)

Nom de l'autorCàrrecTipus d'autorObra?Estat
N. T. Wrightautor primaritotes les edicionscalculat
Kiple, CindyDissenyadorautor secundarialgunes edicionsconfirmat
Lugo, JasonFotògrafautor secundarialgunes edicionsconfirmat
Has d'iniciar sessió per poder modificar les dades del coneixement compartit.
Si et cal més ajuda, mira la pàgina d'ajuda del coneixement compartit.
Títol normalitzat
Títol original
Títols alternatius
Data original de publicació
Gent/Personatges
Informació del coneixement compartit en anglès. Modifica-la per localitzar-la a la teva llengua.
Llocs importants
Esdeveniments importants
Pel·lícules relacionades
Premis i honors
Epígraf
Dedicatòria
Informació del coneixement compartit en anglès. Modifica-la per localitzar-la a la teva llengua.
For Jimmy Dunn
scholar, friend, partner in the gospel
Primeres paraules
Informació del coneixement compartit en anglès. Modifica-la per localitzar-la a la teva llengua.
When I first heard about John Piper's book The Future of Justification: A Response to N. T. Wright, I was torn between two reflections.
Citacions
Darreres paraules
Informació del coneixement compartit en anglès. Modifica-la per localitzar-la a la teva llengua.
(Clica-hi per mostrar-ho. Compte: pot anticipar-te quin és el desenllaç de l'obra.)
Nota de desambiguació
Editor de l'editorial
Creadors de notes promocionals a la coberta
Informació del coneixement compartit en anglès. Modifica-la per localitzar-la a la teva llengua.
Llengua original
CDD/SMD canònics

Referències a aquesta obra en fonts externes.

Wikipedia en anglès (2)

Here in one place Wright now offers a comprehensive account and defense of his perspective on this crucial doctrine. He provides a sweeping overview of the central points in the debate before launching into a thorough explanation of the key texts in Paul's writings. While fully cognizant of tradition and controversy, the final authority for his conclusions is the letters of Paul themselves. Along the way Wright responds to critics, such as John Piper, who have challenged what has come to be called the New Perspective. --from publisher description

No s'han trobat descripcions de biblioteca.

Descripció del llibre
Sumari haiku

Dreceres

Cobertes populars

Valoració

Mitjana: (4)
0.5
1 1
1.5
2 2
2.5 1
3 10
3.5 2
4 17
4.5 3
5 18

Ets tu?

Fes-te Autor del LibraryThing.

 

Quant a | Contacte | LibraryThing.com | Privadesa/Condicions | Ajuda/PMF | Blog | Botiga | APIs | TinyCat | Biblioteques llegades | Crítics Matiners | Coneixement comú | 160,669,773 llibres! | Barra superior: Sempre visible