Clica una miniatura per anar a Google Books.
S'està carregant… French Battleships, 1922-1956de John Jordan, Robert Dumas (Autor)
Cap S'està carregant…
Apunta't a LibraryThing per saber si aquest llibre et pot agradar. No hi ha cap discussió a Converses sobre aquesta obra. If your interest is in the design and deployment of battleships in the French Navy after the Great War there is every reason why you should have this work in your collection, as it is a complete history of these ships. Of most interest to me was the analysis of how the limitations of the French industrial infrastructure impacted the design of these ships, along with a close examination of the damage these ships received at Mers-el-Kebir, Dakar and Casablanca at the hands of France's erstwhile allies. Sense ressenyes | afegeix-hi una ressenya
Referències a aquesta obra en fonts externes. Wikipedia en anglès (17)The battleships of the Dunkerque and Richelieu classes were the most radical and influential designs of the interwar period, and were coveted by the British, the Germans and the Italians following the Armistice of June 1940. After an extensive refit in the USA, Richelieu went on to serve alongside the Royal Navy during 1943-45. Using a wealth of primary-source material, some of which has only recently been made available, John Jordan and Robert Dumas have embarked on a completely new study of these important and technically interesting ships. A full account of their development is followed by a detailed analysis of their design characteristics, profusely illustrated by inboard profiles and schematic drawings. The technical chapters are interspersed with operational histories of the ships, with a particular focus on the operations in which they engaged other heavy units: Mers el-Kebir, Dakar and Casablanca. These accounts include a detailed analysis of their performance in action and the damage sustained, and are supported by specially-drawn maps and by the logs of Strasbourg and Richelieu. Twenty-two colour profile and plan views illustrate the ships' appearance at the various stages of their careers. AUTHOR: John Jordan is the Editor of the Warship annual and a lifelong student of French naval history, on which he has written extensively. Robert Dumas, his collaborator on this book, is France's leading expert on warship design, and the author of numerous books and monographs on the ships of the Marine Nationale. SELLING POINTS: *The most detailed study of these ships ever published, in English or French *For warship enthusiasts these are among the most fascinating of all capital ships *Heavily illustrated with photos and specially commissioned artwork ILLUSTRATIONS 180 images No s'han trobat descripcions de biblioteca. |
Debats actualsCapCobertes populars
Google Books — S'està carregant… GèneresClassificació Decimal de Dewey (DDC)623.825Technology Engineering and allied operations Military Engineering and Marine Engineering Naval architecture; Shipbuilding History of Naval Architecture WarshipsLCC (Clas. Bibl. Congrés EUA)ValoracióMitjana:
Ets tu?Fes-te Autor del LibraryThing. |
Similarly to Friedman, Jordan and Dumas detail the origins of these ships from the late pre-World War I period up through the post-World War II era. These ship design histories are not as detailed as Friedman's explanations of the U.S. Navy's concept and design processes, although there is enough detail here to satisfy most readers. I suspect that the authors may not have been able to access all of the appropriate records as Friedman was able to do; either those records were destroyed during WWII or the French Ministry of Defense has not declassified them.
The big difference between Jordan/Dumas and Friedman is that the French duo provide operational histories of their ships; Friedman does not. This is understandable as the French book really only covers the four ships that were actually built (Dunkerque, Strasbourg, Richelieu, and Jean Bart) whereas Friedman covers the ten U.S. battleships of the same period, all of which had extensive operational histories.
The only down side to this book (and the reason for a four star rating instead of five) is the French authors' propensity for political statements. This book is supposed to be a technical and operational history, not an examination of French nationalism. The authors make clear their strong feelings against the British for Mers el-Kebir and Dakar (still in 2008!), although this attitude is softened by a more positive attitude as the authors discuss Royal Navy assistance to the French in 1943-45. The authors has trouble finding anything positive to say about Americans, despite the assistance provided to get Richelieu operational in 1943-44. This attitude is reflected in the explanations given for the limited assistance rendered to the Marine National in 1943-45 and extends to critical comments concerning U.S.-provided equipment and munitions. The authors would have been better served avoiding these controversial statements. ( )