Clica una miniatura per anar a Google Books.
S'està carregant… Hegel's Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reasonde Terry Pinkard
Cap S'està carregant…
Apunta't a LibraryThing per saber si aquest llibre et pot agradar. No hi ha cap discussió a Converses sobre aquesta obra. Sense ressenyes | afegeix-hi una ressenya
The Phenomenology of Spirit is both one of Hegel's most widely read books and one of his most obscure. The book is the most detailed commentary on Hegel's work available. It develops an independent philosophical account of the general theory of knowledge, culture, and history presented in the Phenomenology. In a clear and straightforward style, Terry Pinkard reconstructs Hegel's theoretical philosophy and shows its connection to ethical and political theory. He sets the work in a historical context and shows the contemporary relevance of Hegel's thought for European and Anglo-American philosophers. The principal audience for the book is teachers and students of philosophy, but the great interest in Hegel's work and the clarity of Pinkard's exposition ensure that historians of ideas, political scientists, and literary theorists will also read it. No s'han trobat descripcions de biblioteca. |
Debats actualsCap
Google Books — S'està carregant… GèneresClassificació Decimal de Dewey (DDC)193Philosophy and Psychology Modern western philosophy German and AustrianLCC (Clas. Bibl. Congrés EUA)ValoracióMitjana:
Ets tu?Fes-te Autor del LibraryThing. |
The best thing about this book, though, is that it makes the Phenomenology - one of the least coherent books of all time - coherent. Pinkard treats the opening chapters as they obviously ought to be treated, an investigation into the minimal conditions for an account of how things are (to put it in unhelpfully abstract terms). He argues that these minimal conditions include consciousness, and that the second section of the PhS is an investigation into the minimal conditions for an account of consciousness - which turns out to include self-consciousness, so that the next section is an investigation into *its* minimal conditions. The last, historical portion of the PhS is an account of how we came to this point. That all this makes sense is remarkable; not sure if it's right though. I suspect it just is incoherent.
One thing to note: I've read the PhS, and re-read most of it many times. It's not clear to me if this is helpful as an introduction to the reading of the PhS, but I'm certain it would be helpful to read alongside Hegel's work. And the introduction is excellent if you're looking for a short intro. ( )