Quentin Scott King

It took me quite a while to complete my reading of this book but that had nothing to do with the book's story or the telling of it. In all my previous reading of biographies of our Presidents, Mr. Clay turned up frequently and with gravitas. I have wanted to know him better. Although this book is more about the War of 1812 and the Treaty of Ghent, there was some of his early life presented in it's pages. I would have liked to read more about his work after the Treaty was signed but I can get that elsewhere if I look hard enough. Meanwhile, I recommend this treatment of the times to history buffs. Much research went into it's writing and there is a very strong bibliography appended to it. I thank McFarland and Company, the publishers, for making it available to some of us members of LibraryThing.… (més)

While I had certainly heard of Henry Clay, I admit to not knowing much about him before reading Quentin Scott King's volume. It's sheer size is rather daunting, but the book has turned out to be a surprisingly good read. I was especially interested to read about Aaron Burr's activities with Harman Blennerhassett (HB's island is near where I used to live, and I enjoyed reading the detailed local history as presented by Mr. King.) The account of a duel Clay fought with one of his political rivals provided some unexpected levity because of their inability to shoot straight.

Unlike some other readers, I did not have any problems with the two-column page format. In fact, considering the smallness of the font, I think the narrow columns helped me keep my place better than a standard wide column would have. I would have liked some maps showing the layout of the land and Clay's travels. Illustrations of the people and places being discussed would have livened things up also.

I appreciate Mr. Scott's effort is writing such a comprehensive book about Clay and am glad to have had the opportunity of reading it.… (més)

I rarely write a negative review because I know how much effort, and even love, that goes into writing a book of this magnitude. However, I must be honest. I've read many books of this era, and I could not get through this one. I absolutely hate the two columns. There are at least two times too many words... no matter how "amazingly complete and detailed" it may purport to be. AND, if there are this many words, I'm not supposed to expect a "deep analysis?" Many words and no deep analysis. No thank you!! ;-(… (més)