Clica una miniatura per anar a Google Books.
S'està carregant… The Science of Middle-Earth: Explaining The Science Behind The Greatest Fantasy Epic Ever Told! (2004)de Henry Gee
Cap S'està carregant…
Apunta't a LibraryThing per saber si aquest llibre et pot agradar. No hi ha cap discussió a Converses sobre aquesta obra. It's a curious witty book. Really peculiar, but I liked it really much ( ) The thing about Henry Gee is that he is a real scientist – not a populizer, not a science journalist - and he loves J.R.R. Tolkien’s Middle Earth. This book is a delight (for all Tolkien fans) both for its insights into Tolkien and the “origins” of Middle Earth, as well as for the scientific explanations. Gee takes a many of features of Middle Earth - its denizens, its topography and its “technology” – and attempts explanations of the science possibly underlying them. In doing, so he is both faithful to the science that he represents and respectful of Tolkien’s conception of Middle Earth. When he cannot explain something – as with the “one ring” – he neither dismisses it as fantasy nor attempts a fictional way out; he simply admits that we do not yet know enough. In this way, he expounds on how Orcs came into being, the problem of the wings of the Balrogs, the acute sight and longevity of the Elves, how Frodo’s Mithril undershirt might have saved him from the troll’s spear, and many other Middle Earth topics. In one memorable chapter, he identifies the theme of loss or diminution that pervades the Rings trilogy – loss of powers, reduction of peoples, lost skills – and relates this to both Tolkien’s personal and professional life, as a scholar of the “ancient, lost tongues of the north..his need for restitution was so great that he was driven.. to create new, lost languages.. and.. to invent a culture and mythology to go with them.” Like all students of Middle Earth, Gee knows in his heart that, somewhere, somewhen , it really existed. This knowledge must be the motivation for his final chapter, in which he takes to task those who, like Richard Dawkins, “know” things so absolutely, that they simply cannot bear anyone else having different views of the world and of reality. How refreshing to hear another scientist try to knock that arrogant professor of “the public understanding of science” off his bully pulpit. It is surely no coincidence that the highlighted “blurb” on the rear of this book is a quote from Simon Conway Morris, professor of evolutionary paleobiology at Cambrige University. Conway Morris – less of a populizer than Dawkins and more of a real researcher – admiringly refers to how Henry Gee “..explores how the marvellous remains marvellous, but not fantastic.. “. From now on, I will want to know every scientist’s Middle Earth credentials before taking them seriously. A series of interconnected essays giving possible real-world scientific explanations for some of the phenomena in Middle Earth. Also an exploration of how the science of Tolkien's own time might have influenced the world he created. Not to be taken entirely seriously I think, but neither is it to be scoffed at. A good read, and certainly a different perspective to the great man's work. Sense ressenyes | afegeix-hi una ressenya
És un estudi de
Henry Gee ingeniously reveals how contemporary science can explain some of the wonders of Middle Earth, where Tolkien's marvellous fantasy creates a world with an insistent sense of reality. Gee delights in explaining such scientific conundrums as: How does Frodo's coat of mithril chain armour deflect deadly blows? How good are Legolas's eyes, he can count the Riders of Rohan at a distance of five leagues, and what does that tell us about the elves? How are the orcs reproduced? Just because 'Lord of the Rings' is the world's most popular fantasy does not prevent scientific explanations for its wonders. No s'han trobat descripcions de biblioteca. |
Debats actualsCapCobertes populars
Google Books — S'està carregant… GèneresClassificació Decimal de Dewey (DDC)823.912Literature English English fiction Modern Period 1901-1999 1901-1945LCC (Clas. Bibl. Congrés EUA)ValoracióMitjana:
Ets tu?Fes-te Autor del LibraryThing. |