True to the title of this book, Delbanco spends about equal time discussing Melville and his works, including many lesser known works like “Pierre.” Adequate treatment of “Moby Dick” is included, and two or his masterpieces, “Bartleby the Scrivener” and “Billy Budd” are discussed in detail. As a retired English teacher who taught Melville, I was looking for a less academic book, much like the recent Thoreau biography (“Henry David Thoreau: A Life”); however, Delbanco’s target market is Melville fans looking for less discussion of the writer’s life and more about what he wrote. And that’s just what he delivered. ( )

An absolutely perfect companion for any Melville reader. Delbonco takes time when necessary to delve deeply into Melville's personal life while not dragging out too many tedious details. His analysis of the political climate during the writing of 'Moby-Dick' gives a quick history lesson which offers an inexperienced 19th century reader perfect context for the novel. Perhaps overblown was Delbanco's emphasis on the (perhaps) homosexual feelings between Melville and Hawthorne, however his analysis of primary documents, namely letters between the two, gave a friends perspective on Melville's work, as opposed to a critics. Stylistically the biography reads very well. Delbanco organizes the material chronologically, paralleling current events and events from Melville's life next to the novel he was writing at the time. The only flaw of the biography is Delbanco's tendency to berate certain points, such as Melville's sexuality or the struggling relationship between Melville and his wife. ( )

This excellent biography is prefaced by a revision of the ‘Extracts’ section at the beginning of Moby Dick. Where the original consists of literary and historical references to whales and whaling, Delbanco’s is a chronologically sequenced series of references to Melville and his writing from literary, cultural and political contexts, demonstrating his continued relevance. His stated intention is to “convey something of the tone and texture of Melville’s time while giving some sense of why, in our time, the glare of his genius remains undimmed” (xxiii). Partial though this sounds, the close readings of Melville’s writing are, for the most part, fair and balanced. They are placed alongside the account of his life with great skill, so that neither life nor work seems to dominate. Delbanco manages to cover a lot of ground in this surprisingly succinct book—in refreshing contrast to Hershel Parker’s weighty volumes. I admit that I found this the most enjoyable and useful of the books in my stack: but I would hesitate to recommend it for the shortlist because, brilliantly written though it is, it is simply one academic’s reading of Melville’s work set against his life, ultimately adding nothing startlingly new to the received image of Melville as a protean and unknowable figure.

This excellent biography is prefaced by a revision of the ‘Extracts’ section at the beginning of Moby Dick. Where the original consists of literary and historical references to whales and whaling, Delbanco’s is a chronologically sequenced series of references to Melville and his writing from literary, cultural and political contexts, demonstrating his continued relevance. His stated intention is to “convey something of the tone and texture of Melville’s time while giving some sense of why, in our time, the glare of his genius remains undimmed” (xxiii). Partial though this sounds, the close readings of Melville’s writing are, for the most part, fair and balanced. They are placed alongside the account of his life with great skill, so that neither life nor work seems to dominate. Delbanco manages to cover a lot of ground in this surprisingly succinct book—in refreshing contrast to Hershel Parker’s weighty volumes. I admit that I found this the most enjoyable and useful of the books in my stack: but I would hesitate to recommend it for the shortlist because, brilliantly written though it is, it is simply one academic’s reading of Melville’s work set against his life, ultimately adding nothing startlingly new to the received image of Melville as a protean and unknowable figure.

An easy to read account of Melville and his work but stronger on the historical context than on insight into the man or his writing ( )